[Mac Pro] GT 120

2009-03-14 18:28:20

#1

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,053|7035|PNW

http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB5 … NDE4NDIyMQ

I've always been eyeing Mac Pros for an audio studio some time down the road (sorry, I just like Logic Pro). The new ones have Nehalem Xeons. Righto.

One problem: http://www.nvidia.com/object/product_ge … 20_us.html

I can't believe Apple took that rebranded piece of crap...but wait, there's more. You can put FOUR of them in your Mac Pro for awesome gaming power! Why couldn't they have just offered a GTX 285/295, since it's a brand new Mac Pro?

Now I know I wouldn't be playing games on it, but it doesn't make sense to spend over $3000 on a computer with a video card like that. I mean, who knows: I might want to do some graphics stuff.

2009-03-14 18:32:42

#2

Aries_37: arrivederci frog; +368|6838|London

the gt120 is mroe aesthetically pleasing

2009-03-14 18:33:40

#3

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6052|Catherine Black

Aries_37 wrote:
the gt120 is mroe aesthetically pleasing

Sums up Macs tbh.

2009-03-14 18:38:26

#4

Aries_37: arrivederci frog; +368|6838|London

I do think the hsf is quite cute

seriously though maybe it's something to do with power? off-chance that 4 120's suck up less power than 1 gtx295?

groping in the dark here, as my money's on apple being impractical as usual

2009-03-14 18:41:14

#5

max: Vela Incident; +1,652|6831|NYC / Hamburg

Macs aren't gaming machines and cuda support in OSX is very limited. With 4 GPUs you can drive 8 screen however ...

_{once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.}

2009-03-14 18:41:15

#6

Morpheus: This shit still going?; +508|6263|The Mitten

It's probably because they already have drivers for the gt120, where as they'd need to write (and then test) drivers for the newer cards....

EE (hats

2009-03-14 18:50:17

#7

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6052|Catherine Black

Morpheus wrote:
It's probably because they already have drivers for the gt120, where as they'd need to write (and then test) drivers for the newer cards....

Soo...

The choices are Mac being

A) Impractical, but stylish
B) Lazy.

2009-03-14 19:10:54

#8

Pochsy: Artifice of Eternity; +702|5807|Toronto

jamiet757 wrote:
the prices for macs are complete bullshit. The base price for that laptop was about $3300, whereas with all the additionals added on, a whopping $22,500. Who in their fucking right mind would pay that much for a laptop? that can't even play games well? ridiculous.

That's not the ridiculous part. The ridiculous part is that Apple continually promotes the idea that they're against the bourgeoisie and all about the little guy and creativity, yet they charge so much for anything. I don't know many artists with this kind of money to piss away. What a pile.

The shape of an eye in front of the ocean, digging for stones and throwing them against its window pane. Take it down dreamer, take it down deep. - Other Families

2009-03-14 20:00:16

#9

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6461|Winland

8600GT QUAD SLI ENABLED

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2009-03-15 01:55:29

#10

TopHat01: Limitless; +117|6168|CA

What I find entertaining about Apple is how they like to take old technology and make it seem like it's brand new. Take the new iPod Shuffle, with the voice activation, which has been around since the '90's, if not earlier. But OH SHIT, Apple's using it so it's automatically brand new technology!

Check out my YouTube channel

2009-03-15 02:14:01

#11

Wallpaper: ☺; +303|6257|The pool

Freezer7Pro wrote:
8600GT QUAD SLI ENABLED

FUCK YEAH

EDIT: Lol @ them charging $150 for each card

Last edited by Wallpaper (2009-03-15 02:17:07)

My flickr

2009-03-15 03:13:05

#12

Bertster7: Confused Pothead; +1,101|6845|SE London

It's not a games machine. It's a workstation machine. Those cards are well suited to the role the machine is designed for. They are a huge step up from the 2600XT which was the typical card fitted to the previous generation (2600XT, 8800GT, 7300GT and X1900XT were the cards most used, 8800GT has compatibility issues with earlier (65nm) models, 7300GT bursts capacitors as soon as you look at it and the fans on the X1900XT would make so much noise it drive all the MacFags mad with rage).

It's better than it was. Are you actually surprised that Macs are overpriced and underpowered?

BF2S Forums [Mac Pro] GT 120

Aries_37 wrote:

Morpheus wrote:

jamiet757 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Board footer