We have had flying cars for over a century, they are called planes.
I've seen that, it's basically just a street legal plane though. And at the same time, I wouldn't really think it should be allowed on the street since it looks unnecessarily wide.
Flying cars have been around for a little while. Just none have been fuel efficient enough to be practical as well as non-powerful enough engines.
Moller tbh.
James Mays somethingorother
That was interesting
That was interesting
Saw that.Sidsnot wrote:
James Mays somethingorother
That was interesting
Rocket-pack ROCKS.
For about 21 seconds.
In response to a user pm on " why I closed this thread. "
I count 3 of 18 posts that are on topic.
This is EE and all, and fine, it's open again. But if the signal to noise ratio gets totally out of hand I will close threads.
I suggest some people see below.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=57688
I count 3 of 18 posts that are on topic.
This is EE and all, and fine, it's open again. But if the signal to noise ratio gets totally out of hand I will close threads.
I suggest some people see below.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=57688
If I were a mod ATG I would of just deleted the spam replies and not closed the thread
jkjk
just messing
jkjk
just messing
That's fine, but AWM's and modhistory reports are usually associated with post deletions.Sidsnot wrote:
If I were a mod ATG I would of just deleted the spam replies and not closed the thread
jkjk
just messing
It's just how it works.
I'm not unreasonable.
EE should strive for a 50% signal to noise ratio and nobody would get dinged, most likely.
In fact, that's a good tip for everybody; it's about a body of work thing.
Somebody spams, or a report is given, and we usually investigate. If so and so has a high spam rate in the recent posts he is more likely to get sent to the penalty box. If there is a mod note that says something like " he's a troll, ban on next offense " then you have to understand you are pretty well screwed.
It's nothing personal.
Have fun.