Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5999

xBlackPantherx wrote:

Macbeth - You're critiquing me for pointing out someone elses words and judging them when you are doing exactly that of me? Awesome.
Wait so I was just making a general statement about teenagers. So you are admitting that you are a teenager who hasn't done anything for his country?
xBlackPantherx
Grow up, or die
+142|6756|California

Macbeth wrote:

xBlackPantherx wrote:

Macbeth - You're critiquing me for pointing out someone elses words and judging them when you are doing exactly that of me? Awesome.
Wait so I was just making a general statement about teenagers. So you are admitting that you are a teenager who hasn't done anything for his country?
You're reading between lines that aren't there. I was just saying that you're assuming things about me when you're criticizing me for doing just that. Just to be clear, I mean you assuming I'm a teenager.
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7179|Cambridge (UK)

xBlackPantherx wrote:

...You're critiquing me...
The word is 'criticising'.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,822|6519|eXtreme to the maX

FEOS wrote:

It's because he was always gay for Mexico. Never a selling point among his base (or fringe).
I see, so you see Bush sitting on his hands for eight years while the US faces major issues from illegal immigrants, drugs and gang crime as just 'George being a bit gay'?
Fuck Israel
rdx-fx
...
+955|7005

rdx-fx wrote:

And does Mr. Obama have a coherent plan for when the rounds start flying across the border?

We shoot back this time?

Under Clinton, we got to build a border fence for a couple miles through Naco and Nogales.
(Yes, we, as in I was one of the surveyors that put those two fences in, thanks)

Not alot of clear policy for what we were supposed to do when we got people shooting at us from the other side of the border.
Ended up being typical Clinton policy:  get shot at, don't shoot back.  Don't do anything to attract a CNN newscrew, for gods sake.. I'm busy getting blowjobs and would rather not have to go give a press conference

I'm guessing Mr. Obama is going to be similar.
Pretty plan, good speech, devoid of critical operational details necessary for success.


I hope it works, but I'm not enthusiastic with the lack of real planning being shown.

xBlackPantherx wrote:

You're very against Obama aren't you?
Yes. He's dangerously naive, less politically experienced than even Bush Jr., and is already pushing many anti 2nd amendment bills on the down-low (in the original definition of downlow).

xBlackPantherx wrote:

Criticizing every  thing he does that you don't like even though he's already done more about critical situations in 2 months than Bush did?
I'm not a Bush neocon either.  I'm Pro-science, Atheist, anti-big-government, pro constitution.  Neither the Obama liberals nor the Bush Neocons are small-government constitutionalists.

And, though Obama may have good intentions - he's less experienced than even Bush Jr.
If you thought the Bush Jr Presidency was a colossal fuckup - watch what someone with even less experience can do...

xBlackPantherx wrote:

You say impeach Obama yet you say you're "American"?
Yes, I'm very much American.
This grossly negligent spending spree we're on is going to do a great deal of damage to my country.
My daughters are going to be paying for this gross negligence, and I'm not happy about it at all.

xBlackPantherx wrote:

F*** off. Seriously.
You first, sweetheart.

(Edit: He's a fan of the Black Panther animal, not the racist terrorist group)

xBlackPantherx wrote:

Stop sitting on your couch criticizing other people.
Why?
I've done my time in the military (8 years), I pay my taxes, I have my own (small) business, I consult for a couple other small businesses, I'm a husband and father.  And, after all that is covered, I still manage to have a little time to argue with clowns like you.
Should i be doing more?
Please, tell me how much more you're doing.

xBlackPantherx wrote:

Actually, since you seem to know so much, how about you go get your own small personal military and solve the border/drug problem yourself? You can't? What a shame. Aren't even gonna try? I guess your not 'American' then and are criminalized now.
How about rereading what I'd written before.
You even quoted it.
"Under Clinton, we got to build a border fence for a couple miles through Naco and Nogales.
(Yes, we, as in I was one of the surveyors that put those two fences in, thanks)"

I was one of the 4 Army Surveyors for the border projects in Naco & Nogales.
I did do something directly relating to border security.
How about you?

xBlackPantherx wrote:

Of course there's always a doubtful side to things. You can't control every event that happens. The point is that he is actually trying to change things instead of what Bush did and what people like you do; which is nothing. You have an exponentially better life than 80% of the world that lives on <$10 a day.
I've done nothing eh?
See above.
I've helped put in border fences & walls to divert illegal traffic around population centers, had interesting encounters with drug runners crossing said border at night while guarding our equipment.

I was also in Operation Provide Comfort II, keeping Saddam from committing further genocide against his Kurdish citizens.. and almost got my happy ass killed off a number of times there.

I've been to a handful of other shitholes too, trying to help some of those less fortunate people..
really fun when you've got children throwing rocks at you, trying to get you to move away from the generators providing power for clean water, medical services, and lighting - so they can scavenge the metal from the generator to sell for scrap.
Been there too.

Been in the Iraqi desert, helping mark dead iraqi tanks with orange paint.  Making sure they weren't a chemical or radiological hazard to whatever random nomads happened across them.

Those poor, unfortunate, abused masses of people?
They're not a CNN special to me.  I've been around them.  I've been in a position to try to help, and have done so within the limits of what time and equipment we've had on hand.

Now.
What the hell have you done?

xBlackPantherx wrote:

I, for one, am happy he is at least trying to help solve this problem a bit by cracking down.
As I'd stated originally;
Great that he wants to do something.
Sucks that he seems like he's more interested in giving lip-service and the shallow appearance of a plan, while completely lacking in a properly well thought out plan.
I've been front row, center stage to a fair number of great idea, great press conference - poor planning, poor equipment, no clear rules of engagement scenarios under President Clinton.  I am really not eager to see the next generation of soldiers suffer through that same bullshit.

Obama is good at ideas, has good intentions - but he is trying to do too much, spending too freely, and not developing plans that will work.
He is surrounded by people that are long on agendas and untested ideas - yet short on practical experience, patience, wisdom, and detailed planning.

He is spending the money now on half-assed plans..  the same money that later generations would've needed for their own situations.
He is ruining our economic viability on half-formed wishful thinking plans.
I would feel a little bit better if people with the experience and intelligence of Kissinger or Greenspan were at least being consulted for their perspectives.  NOT that borderline psychotic Rahm Emanuel, Obama's chief advisor

Rahm Emanuel
""Emanuel was so angry at the president's enemies that he stood up at a celebratory dinner with colleagues from the campaign, grabbed a steak knife and began rattling off a list of betrayers, shouting 'Dead! ... Dead! ... Dead!' and plunging the knife into the table after every name."

Last edited by rdx-fx (2009-03-24 23:04:02)

Braddock
Agitator
+916|6704|Éire
A big ol' concrete wall should do the trick... at least he's doing something more productive on the issue than clearing brush on the ranch.
Vax
Member
+42|6265|Flyover country
600 + miles of border fence completed under Bush isn't exactly "doing nothing" 

But why am I not surprised at the spouting off with no basis in facts ..

I bet half of you would have bitched about this when Bush did it, but if Obama did similar, you'd be saying GJ "at least he's doing something"
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6824|'Murka

Dilbert_X wrote:

FEOS wrote:

It's because he was always gay for Mexico. Never a selling point among his base (or fringe).
I see, so you see Bush sitting on his hands for eight years while the US faces major issues from illegal immigrants, drugs and gang crime as just 'George being a bit gay'?
And where did I characterize him as "a bit gay". He was ridiculously gay for Mexico. The measures he did take (see Vax's 600+ miles of border fencing) were too little, too late...and only because he was taking too much heat from his base.

Drugs and gang crime aren't/weren't the issue for the illegal immigrant problem. The concern was/is the ease of infiltration by terrorists into the CONUS.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
xBlackPantherx
Grow up, or die
+142|6756|California

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

xBlackPantherx wrote:

...You're critiquing me...
The word is 'criticising'.
No. I'm pretty sure I meant critiquing...it is a word in case you didn't know, and happens to be a synonym of criticizing (which, btw, you spelt wrong; ironically) anyways.

–noun
1.     an article or essay criticizing a literary or other work; detailed evaluation; review.
2.     a criticism or critical comment on some problem, subject, etc.
3.     the art or practice of criticism.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,822|6519|eXtreme to the maX

rdx-fx wrote:

Sucks that he seems like he's more interested in giving lip-service and the shallow appearance of a plan, while completely lacking in a properly well thought out plan.
Sometimes any plan is better than no plan, I guess it can be revised as it goes along.
Agreed on Emmanuel, not so much on Greenspan.

FEOS wrote:

And where did I characterize him as "a bit gay". He was ridiculously gay for Mexico.
Oh fine, 'very gay' then.
Drugs and gang crime aren't/weren't the issue for the illegal immigrant problem.
They do seem to be a smidgen of an issue no?
the kind of thing you might want to address if you're President?
The concern was/is the ease of infiltration by terrorists into the CONUS.
Who infiltrates your CONUS and what they do when they are in there is not something I want to hear about.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-03-25 00:38:56)

Fuck Israel
Adams_BJ
Russian warship, go fuck yourself
+2,055|7036|Little Bentcock

xBlackPantherx wrote:

[
and happens to be a synonym of criticizing (which, btw, you spelt wrong; ironically) anyways.
Only spelt wrong in your part of the world..
Everywhere else it criticising.
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6824|'Murka

Dilbert_X wrote:

FEOS wrote:

And where did I characterize him as "a bit gay". He was ridiculously gay for Mexico.
Oh fine, 'very gay' then.
Drugs and gang crime aren't/weren't the issue for the illegal immigrant problem.
They do seem to be a smidgen of an issue no?
the kind of thing you might want to address if you're President?
That's actually a law enforcement issue, which falls primarily to local/state institutions. The President's first concern with regard to borders should be National Security. Drugs and gang crime are not a national security issue, per se.

Dilbert_X wrote:

The concern was/is the ease of infiltration by terrorists into the CONUS.
Who infiltrates your CONUS and what they do when they are in there is not something I want to hear about.
That's what happens when you smoke too much reefer.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|7109|NJ
A big ol' concrete wall? Are you kidding me? The reason it works for Israel is because Israel is small and can actually police the wall.. Also other then bombings, there is really no reason anyone wants to get in. We're talking about a country that is lax on it's illegal immigrant, so people try to jump the border for a better living.. Also we're talking about a MULTI Billion dollar drug ring, I'm pretty sure a concrete wall isn't going to stop them.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|7109|NJ

FEOS wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

FEOS wrote:

And where did I characterize him as "a bit gay". He was ridiculously gay for Mexico.
Oh fine, 'very gay' then.
Drugs and gang crime aren't/weren't the issue for the illegal immigrant problem.
They do seem to be a smidgen of an issue no?
the kind of thing you might want to address if you're President?
That's actually a law enforcement issue, which falls primarily to local/state institutions. The President's first concern with regard to borders should be National Security. Drugs and gang crime are not a national security issue, per se.

Dilbert_X wrote:

The concern was/is the ease of infiltration by terrorists into the CONUS.
Who infiltrates your CONUS and what they do when they are in there is not something I want to hear about.
That's what happens when you smoke too much reefer.
We pay most of our fed taxes for "national security and defense", and we don't even protect our borders?

I wonder how many people get robbed or murdered by Illegal Immigrants ever year?
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6824|'Murka

cpt.fass1 wrote:

We pay most of our fed taxes for "national security and defense", and we don't even protect our borders?

I wonder how many people get robbed or murdered by Illegal Immigrants ever year?
Research ftw.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7a/U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2007.png/450px-U.S._Federal_Spending_-_FY_2007.png

During FY 2008, the U.S. government spent nearly $800 billion on defense and homeland security, approximately 30% of tax receipts.
30% =/= "most of our fed taxes"

Last edited by FEOS (2009-03-25 21:32:42)

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
rdx-fx
...
+955|7005

Dilbert_X wrote:

rdx-fx wrote:

Sucks that he seems like he's more interested in giving lip-service and the shallow appearance of a plan, while completely lacking in a properly well thought out plan.
Sometimes any plan is better than no plan, I guess it can be revised as it goes along.
Agreed on Emmanuel, not so much on Greenspan.
A phrase frequently taught to young Sergeants in the military;
'A good enough plan, executed forcefully right now - is better than a perfect plan, executed after it's too late'

A large difference between a 'good enough' plan and 'any plan'.
Sometimes a bad plan is worse than doing nothing, as well. (I'll leave it up to you to find an example of that.)

Greenspan & Kissinger have tons of experience, and are fairly intelligent guys.
Used them as examples of such.
Whether or not I agree with all of their ideas is something else entirely.

Rumsfeld has tons of experience and intelligence too - but there's no chance Obama has him on speed dial.

Last edited by rdx-fx (2009-03-25 22:00:41)

Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7130
Old Hilary is on the job...
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/ … 1839.shtml
"But Mexico says it will never allow U.S. troops to operate on their soil and the possibility the U.S. could deploy National Guard troops to the border is causing concern." 
"Criminals are outgunning law enforcement officials, Clinton said, referring to guns and military-style equipment like night vision goggles and body armor that the cartels are smuggling into Mexico from the United States. "

I really hope Hilary and co... are serious and protect the border... and if Mexico doesn't want any US Military in their country... thats fine...
Lets build the wall and seal the border and they can shoot and kill each other in peace...

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/ … 1839.shtml
Love is the answer
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5999

Drug prices are going to spike soon if this gets out of hand. If only there was some way to invest a sum of money into drug sales.
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7130
what is weed listed as on the DOW...lol?    buy today...
Love is the answer
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,822|6519|eXtreme to the maX
Obama's plans at least appear 'good enough' for now, and he's trying to get on with them.
Can't see anyone else putting up ideas, after eight years it is refreshing.

A lot of people are arguing Greenspan's policies are a big part of the mess now.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-03-26 00:14:15)

Fuck Israel

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard