BF2S Forums Should all males be circumcised?

Sydney wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Sydney wrote:

I know, that's my point. It's really well designed, it's just there, I don't even notice it.

Hygiene? Pull back in shower ftw.

Where did they design yours? Gucci?

Henschel. It's the German steel, baby.

Last edited by .Sup (2009-04-01 15:07:54)

.Sup wrote:

Sydney wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Where did they design yours? Gucci?

Henschel. It's the German steel, baby.

steel gets rusty, women don't like rusty men
Edit: unless its stainless babeh!

GraphicArtist J wrote:

Don't like dick-caca in between the head and the skin. So yeah go for it.

Last edited by Sydney (2009-04-01 15:10:56)

Kmarion wrote:

I considered closing this topic while I finished my chicken bake.

http://i41.tinypic.com/10y13f5.jpg

True story.

.Sup wrote:

(get blown more often tbh )

Uzique wrote:

Mutantsteak wrote:

Whatever the woman wants

You'd cut parts of your dick off for the demands of a serpentine woman?

So what happens when you break-up and find another? Pretty sure they don't give receipts at the hospital for circumcision operations...

It's only better "for hygiene" if a guy with foreskin doesn't know how to roll it back and give the goddamn pecker a good clean in the shower. That's like saying it's better to shave off all your bodyhair because it's better for hygiene reasons; yeah... that or you could just LEARN TO USE SHAMPOO.

article wrote:

In countries where fewer than 20 percent of men were circumcised, cervical-cancer rates were about 70 percent higher than in countries where more than 80 percent were circumcised.

article wrote:

All of this makes many public-health experts in the United States lament the decision of some states to withdraw Medicaid coverage for routine circumcision. "Because uncircumcised males face greater risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections," a different study concludes, "lack of Medicaid coverage for circumcision may translate into future health disparities for children born to poor families."

article wrote:

But two years ago, a consortium of experts convened by the World Health Organization and UNAIDS (the United Nations' HIV program) announced that circumcision should indeed "be part of a comprehensive HIV prevention package." It did so because three separate, meticulous medical trials in Kenya, Uganda, and South Africa, involving more than 10,000 men, had proved that circumcision could reduce the risk of female-to-male HIV infection by approximately 60 percent. This discovery is one that, over the next two decades, could save three million lives in Africa alone.

article wrote:

These results have caused many U.S. doctors to reconsider their positions. "I've always told families that the health benefits of circumcision are real, but not enough to warrant advocating that all boys be circumcised," says Lise Johnson, M.D., the director of healthy-newborn nurseries at Boston's Brigham and Women's Hospital. "But I find these HIV studies pretty striking. The weight of scientific evidence might be shifting in favor of circumcision."

article wrote:

For every 1,500 circumcisions, there are maybe three complications, nearly all of which amount to a little unexpected bleeding or a treatable infection. In return, according to the AAP, circumcised boys have a lower risk of urinary-tract infections and penile cancer, and, indeed, "a slightly lower risk of getting sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HIV, the virus that causes AIDS."

article wrote:

it wasn't until the North Africa campaign of World War II that American doctors turned into enthusiastic circumcisers. More than 145,000 American GIs based there slacked off on their cleaning regimens and came down with foreskin-related ouches — chiefly, balanoposthitis (inflammation of the foreskin and glans), phimosis (a foreskin that's too tight to retract over the glans), and paraphimosis (a foreskin stuck in the retracted position). After the war, doctors advanced a theory that circumcision reduces rates of cervical cancer — a hypothesis now confirmed by scientific research.

article wrote:

But whatever you decide for you and yours, do not let anyone tell you circumcision can't slow the march of HIV. At a time when billions of American tax dollars are pouring into Africa to fight AIDS, it is extremely important that money is spent on methods that have been proved to help.

article wrote:

For a week after the surgery, Jones would wake up in pain from a morning erection pulling at the dissolvable stitches. But after 2 weeks, his wife was more than ready to test out his newly shorn package. The sensation? "This is better than before," says Jones, now 7 years post-op. "The skin under the foreskin used to be very sensitive — sometimes too sensitive. Now that it's aired out, it's a nonissue."

Last edited by Nappy (2009-04-02 01:45:25)

iNeedUrFace4Soup wrote:

Oh shit, it takes like 2 seconds to wash that thing. Better cut it off.