le sauceThe most powerful people on the Internet don't work for Microsoft, Google or the government. Rather, they're a bunch of antisocial, foul-mouthed, clever nerds who congregate at a largely unknown Web site called 4chan.org.
4chan!


le sauceThe most powerful people on the Internet don't work for Microsoft, Google or the government. Rather, they're a bunch of antisocial, foul-mouthed, clever nerds who congregate at a largely unknown Web site called 4chan.org.
No.TPM-J45P3R- wrote:
4chan!
No is good, but On is just so much more!Gooners wrote:
No.TPM-J45P3R- wrote:
4chan!
I saw a pic of a cat's skull being stepped on by a heel of a womans shoe the other day and the responses to that were not negative.wrote:
In an atmosphere where anything goes, the only thing that seems to truly rile a /b/tard is the abuse of a cat
I visited some odd times just to see the place from where many of this sites members get their copypasta from.liquidat0r wrote:
I've never actually visited 4chan.
And its even worse when they do it in public. I made a thread on this vid http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=121662 where they do that stupid crap in public.Poseidon wrote:
This is exactly why 4chan isn't funny anymore. Although, it really never was.
Publicity.
It funny laughing at them, its just a bunch of losers going out in public with masks on blasting rickroll and memes. Some of it is funny but keep that stuff on the internet where it belongs.Poseidon wrote:
The scientology protests were kinda funny...in the beginning. Then they just got old.
When I see friends on Facebook saying stuff like "lulz" and "epic win", etc...you know 4chan is just not funny anymore.
I find 4chan to be a bunch of reject teenagers who can only talk shit anonymously because if people really saw how fucking worthless they are no one would pay attention.Pochsy wrote:
No is good, but On is just so much more!Gooners wrote:
No.TPM-J45P3R- wrote:
4chan!
I find 4chan to be largely harmless. The people who pull the real world stunts would have done it without the aid of the site anyways in most cases, but now you have a specific social network to point the finger at. 'Movements' such as the anonymous rallies against the church of Scientology existed before 4chan jumped the boat and made it public. I could even see how in that case 4chan could be seen as a positive actor.
Sure the people are fucked, but they aren't news worthy or threat as they are made out to be.VicktorVauhn wrote:
I find 4chan to be a bunch of reject teenagers who can only talk shit anonymously because if people really saw how fucking worthless they are no one would pay attention.Pochsy wrote:
No is good, but On is just so much more!Gooners wrote:
No.
I find 4chan to be largely harmless. The people who pull the real world stunts would have done it without the aid of the site anyways in most cases, but now you have a specific social network to point the finger at. 'Movements' such as the anonymous rallies against the church of Scientology existed before 4chan jumped the boat and made it public. I could even see how in that case 4chan could be seen as a positive actor.
But the main problem with the average 4channer is that they are unoriginal kids with the lamest sense of humor ever who don't know how to let a fucking joke die.
OKAY MANGooners wrote:
No.TPM-J45P3R- wrote:
4chan!
Same.liquidat0r wrote:
I've never actually visited 4chan.
Last edited by DoctaStrangelove (2009-04-07 13:38:29)
Meh, pretty much all the mainstream sources that are news for profit do man.kylef wrote:
Fox sucks for news.
Gooners wrote:
No.TPM-J45P3R- wrote:
4chan!
oh god. you judge them trying to explain stupid nerd meme to non nerds......get real.kylef wrote:
"Surfing YouTube and suddenly find yourself watching an old Rick Astley music video? You were "rickrolled" by 4chan." - right, because they are the only ones in the world who do that.
Fox sucks for news.