He just proved your point with his last post in your topic.Lucien wrote:
Good lord Jgrasli is stupid
He has to post his uninformed opinion in every damn thread. He's a typical under-average player who doesn't give two shits about the game as long as it's easier for him
jgrasli wrote:
If YOU NEED to go prone in most infantry fights, you are a noob. I see players going prone instantly when they see someone. If you cant fire while standing or crouching, play another game. It seems like CoD4 is the game for you; fast paced and point'n click HEADSHOT.
Did you see his post in my LGM thread?Lucien wrote:
No seriously guys, is he trolling or what?jgrasli wrote:
If YOU NEED to go prone in most infantry fights, you are a noob. I see players going prone instantly when they see someone. If you cant fire while standing or crouching, play another game. It seems like CoD4 is the game for you; fast paced and point'n click HEADSHOT.
Obvious_Troll wrote:
Just wait to get lock-on and fire. You know they are meant for ground-attack only, right? They wont work as anything else..
you think? YOU THINK? come up with some goddamn reasonsDoctaStrangelove wrote:
To be honest I think the choppers are very over-powered in the old versions and increasing their range to what it was will just make them too good again.
Because it could rape ANYTHING from far outside anything's range. Also the TV missiles aren't even supposed to be used against other choppers, they're are just that good that people were able to shoot down other choppers with them. The way it was, choppers didn't have to risk getting close enough to kill their targets, they could sit at a very safe distance away and shoot the missiles at people, the guy at the other end could never get close enough to effectively retaliate.Lucien wrote:
you think? YOU THINK? come up with some goddamn reasonsDoctaStrangelove wrote:
To be honest I think the choppers are very over-powered in the old versions and increasing their range to what it was will just make them too good again.
I now remember why I hated you and Jord so much
You do realize this isn't increasing the range, but restoring it, right? To how it was for years, until it got nerfed? Evidently no one played BF2 until 2 years after its release, then..:i7|Batman wrote:
a serious fucked up game that no one will want to play.
+1 motherfucker.:i7|Batman wrote:
Stop asking to change shit. At first it was like k cool fix these bugs and tweak gameplay slightly. Now every little thing is being cried about which will lead to a serious fucked up game that no one will want to play.
No shit, you act like there isn't a reason it was changed in the first place.Lucien wrote:
You do realize this isn't increasing the range, but restoring it, right? To how it was for years, until it got nerfed? Evidently no one played BF2 until 2 years after its release, then..:i7|Batman wrote:
a serious fucked up game that no one will want to play.
Simply because DICE changed it doesn't make it just..:i7|Batman wrote:
No shit, you act like there isn't a reason it was changed in the first place.
Lucien just wants the game to be all pr0 1337 CAL game so he can pwn nubz and pub an wit uber skillz, while not really caring about the repercussions for the casual player..:i7|Batman wrote:
No shit, you act like there isn't a reason it was changed in the first place.Lucien wrote:
You do realize this isn't increasing the range, but restoring it, right? To how it was for years, until it got nerfed? Evidently no one played BF2 until 2 years after its release, then..:i7|Batman wrote:
a serious fucked up game that no one will want to play.
What repercussions ? He just wants the game to take some damn skill.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Lucien just wants the game to be all pr0 1337 CAL game so he can pwn nubz and pub an wit uber skillz, while not really caring about the repercussions for the casual player..:i7|Batman wrote:
No shit, you act like there isn't a reason it was changed in the first place.Lucien wrote:
You do realize this isn't increasing the range, but restoring it, right? To how it was for years, until it got nerfed? Evidently no one played BF2 until 2 years after its release, then.
No it doesn't but there was a reason behind this particular change. Try Daqing 16 with TVs that can hit each others pads. That's so much fun!!! And man, Sharqi isn't enough over a rape fest, we should make it even more easy to rape!!Lucien wrote:
Simply because DICE changed it doesn't make it just..:i7|Batman wrote:
No shit, you act like there isn't a reason it was changed in the first place.
I am aware of this.Lucien wrote:
Doctastrangelove, that attitude is what caused patches 1.2 to 1.4
There is skill, and there is thinking. One is mindlessly pointing a gun at people, the other is knowing when to point the gun and when to do something else.TrashBlinD wrote:
What repercussions ? He just wants the game to take some damn skill.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Lucien just wants the game to be all pr0 1337 CAL game so he can pwn nubz and pub an wit uber skillz, while not really caring about the repercussions for the casual player..:i7|Batman wrote:
No shit, you act like there isn't a reason it was changed in the first place.
Last edited by DoctaStrangelove (2009-04-22 15:43:20)
Last edited by Lucien (2009-04-22 15:44:57)
uriteTehMyke wrote:
i demand all movement be reverted back to 1.03 specs, and everyone that doesnt like it can go play project failurey.. am i rite
plz do thisTehMyke wrote:
i demand all movement be reverted back to 1.03 specs, and everyone that doesnt like it can go play project failurey.. am i rite
Taking what I'm saying and spinning it around into completely different things doesn't make you right, it just makes you a retard. I never said that range is the cause or solution to pad rape, I mentioned it as a repercussion of restoring the range to what it once was. You justify a greater TV range by saying it'll solve ranging when the real solution to ranging is using your head and learning to rush, not tweaking gameplay. Does messing with a rangers timing cause other problems in the game? No. Will tweaking range cause other problems in gameplay? Yes.Lucien wrote:
Why am I even discussing this with you, you just fling fallacy after fallacy at me. "more of this and it will ruin the game!" "Dice did it, it must be good!" And now, finally, "You just suck". Even your attempts at reasoning - You really think that range is the cause of and solution to pad rape?
Oh and DSL, don't you go telling people about skill.
Last edited by .:i7|Batman (2009-04-22 15:53:04)