Download accelerators

2009-05-03 15:39:35

#1

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6051|Catherine Black

So my 30-day trial of Internet Download Manager just finished, and I need a new accelerator.

I want something simiar, so integration with Firefox would be nice, scheduled download queues, user-friendly interface, preferably free (but not essential), something I can copypasta links into etc.

Cheerie.

2009-05-03 15:44:22

#2

Brasso: member; +1,549|6893

downthemall

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

2009-05-03 15:47:51

#3

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|7002|Toronto | Canada

Finray wrote:
So my 30-day trial of Internet Download Manager just finished, and I need a new accelerator.
preferably free (but not essential)

Wait, whats the problem then?

2009-05-03 15:52:05

#4

bugz: Fission Mailed; +3,311|6575

IDM can be integrated with FF. Just download the full version.

Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/ebug122

2009-05-03 16:01:53

#5

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6051|Catherine Black

It's alright, Gooners sorted me out with a working copy of IDM. Cheers.

2009-05-03 16:19:33

#6

FatherTed: xD; +3,936|6763|so randum

always wondered, how do these actually work?

Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella

2009-05-03 16:22:36

#7

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6884|London, England

It works by downloading the same file off multiple servers but in different parts and then rejoins them once the download is finished. Thus speeding things up.

I managed to get a cracked version of IDM, best thing ever. Coupled with an RS account and I'm hitting 900KB/s these days. Not bad. I get around 500KB/s when downloading normally off a good website. Haven't really tried torrents, my ISP doesn't like torrents

2009-05-04 04:26:15

#8

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6051|Catherine Black

Mekstizzle wrote:
It works by downloading the same file off multiple servers but in different parts and then rejoins them once the download is finished. Thus speeding things up.

Emmmm, not quite.

Some servers limit the speed people can download from. Download accelerators get around this by connecting multiple times, increasing the speed by a multiple of how many times you connected.

So if you were getting a top of 200kB/s, and you connected 5 times with a download accelerator, you could, in theory, get 1mB/s.

2009-05-04 04:27:31

#9

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6416|what

Finray wrote:
Mekstizzle wrote:
It works by downloading the same file off multiple servers but in different parts and then rejoins them once the download is finished. Thus speeding things up.
Emmmm, not quite.

Some servers limit the speed people can download from. Download accelerators get around this by connecting multiple times, increasing the speed by a multiple of how many times you connected.

Duh, that's what Mek said.

2009-05-04 04:38:47

#10

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6051|Catherine Black

AussieReaper wrote:
Finray wrote:
Mekstizzle wrote:
It works by downloading the same file off multiple servers but in different parts and then rejoins them once the download is finished. Thus speeding things up.
Emmmm, not quite.

Some servers limit the speed people can download from. Download accelerators get around this by connecting multiple times, increasing the speed by a multiple of how many times you connected.
Duh, that's what Mek said.

He said you download from multiple servers, when infact you connect to the same server multiple times..

2009-05-04 04:58:58

#11

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|6970|67.222.138.85

mek described a torrent

2009-05-04 15:22:38

#12

TopHat01: Limitless; +117|6168|CA

What ever happened to just being happy with getting the speed you signed up for?

Check out my YouTube channel

2009-05-04 15:32:54

#13

TheEternalPessimist: Wibble; +412|6883|Mhz

TopHat01 wrote:
What ever happened to just being happy with getting the speed you signed up for?

Time is money, would you throw money away? Thought not.

2009-05-04 15:36:39

#14

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6051|Catherine Black

TopHat01 wrote:
What ever happened to just being happy with getting the speed you signed up for?

Because I don't get the speed I signed up for.

EDIT: And you can manage your downloads well, queue them, everything I described in OP tbh.

Last edited by Finray (2009-05-04 15:37:20)

2009-05-04 16:37:25

#15

mikkel: Member; +383|6864

Flaming_Maniac wrote:
mek described a torrent

Not really. Sourcing segments of the same file from multiple repositories is a pretty classic way of accelerating downloads. A common implementation was using HTTP 1.1 ranged GET requests, with concatenation logic handled by the downloader client.

2009-05-04 17:21:01

#16

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6785|...

Finray wrote:
Because I don't get the speed I signed up for.

If you have a small pipe that is allowing downloads slower than the host is putting out, how does this help?

2009-05-04 17:22:47

#17

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|6970|67.222.138.85

But we understand that concept today as a torrent, not when people talk about download accelerators. Things may have been different some years ago.

2009-05-04 17:30:14

#18

mikkel: Member; +383|6864

Flaming_Maniac wrote:
But we understand that concept today as a torrent, not when people talk about download accelerators. Things may have been different some years ago.

No, we don't. Bittorrent is just one way of fetching fragments of files. Mek wasn't describing a torrent, he was describing the general method of sourcing individual files from multiple repositories, as relevant to download accelerators. In this context, he was right in his specific explanation. There are other ways to go about it than the method he described, but he was right, and he was not describing a torrent.

BF2S Forums Download accelerators

Finray wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

Finray wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Finray wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

TopHat01 wrote:

TopHat01 wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Finray wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Board footer