CammRobb
Banned
+1,510|6393|Carnoustie MASSIF
Youtube doesn't work on my Chrome it would seem, it doesn't display any of the videos on BF2S either. When opening a vid on youtube, it says "an error occured. please try again later". What's going on?
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6416|what

Clear your cache, try again.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
CammRobb
Banned
+1,510|6393|Carnoustie MASSIF
ctrl+f5 rite?
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6416|what

SirSchloppy wrote:

ctrl+f5 rite?
For IE and firefox yes, but for chrome that might just be "Reload current page, ignoring cached content"
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Kurazoo
Pheasant Plucker
+440|6947|West Yorkshire, U.K
Spanner > About Google Chrome > Make sure its up to date
CammRobb
Banned
+1,510|6393|Carnoustie MASSIF

Kurazoo wrote:

Spanner > About Google Chrome > Make sure its up to date
Nope. Didn't work.
TSI
Cholera in the time of love
+247|6244|Toronto
The irony here is just staggering.
I like pie.
CammRobb
Banned
+1,510|6393|Carnoustie MASSIF

TSI wrote:

The irony here is just staggering.
How?
TSI
Cholera in the time of love
+247|6244|Toronto
Google advertises its new Chrome browser as better on the Youtube homepage (Google owns both, as you know). It's funny it should break on them.
I like pie.
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6051|Catherine Black
Flash updated?
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
Tehremos
Parcel of ol' Crams
+128|6671|Somersetshire

Finray wrote:

Flash updated?
Chrome has always had a little problem with flash (especially on youtube) where it doesn't display it and instead just has a blank spot.
But it's faster then my firefox with fasterfox, so F5'ing every now and then doesn't bother me.
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6785|...

Tehremos wrote:

But it's faster then my firefox with fasterfox
What kind of numbers are talking? tbh I perceive very little difference in speed, not enough to make we want to hobble along with a  crippled browser (although I've not had any of these issues).
Tehremos
Parcel of ol' Crams
+128|6671|Somersetshire

jsnipy wrote:

Tehremos wrote:

But it's faster then my firefox with fasterfox
What kind of numbers are talking? tbh I perceive very little difference in speed, not enough to make we want to hobble along with a  crippled browser (although I've not had any of these issues).
Generally start ups are the biggest difference for me, page loading itself is pretty close, un-noticeable lol

Faster Start up + nice look + Chrome Task Manager
Little BaBy JESUS
m8
+394|6412|'straya
Haven't had any problems with chrome... and its alot faster than IE for me...
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6884|London, England
Is there any way to get Chrome without using Google's shitty installer program, I hate it when they make you download a program so that you can download a program, what is up with that fucking shit
FFLink
There is.
+1,380|6954|Devon, England

Mekstizzle wrote:

Is there any way to get Chrome without using Google's shitty installer program, I hate it when they make you download a program so that you can download a program, what is up with that fucking shit
Don't be an idiot. pathetic how you are.

That's such a petty comment, IMO.

Last edited by FFLink13 (2009-05-11 13:54:08)

Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6051|Catherine Black

Mekstizzle wrote:

Is there any way to get Chrome without using Google's shitty installer program, I hate it when they make you download a program so that you can download a program, what is up with that fucking shit
Pretty much, no. It's only like half a meg though.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|6677|Finland

Mekstizzle wrote:

Is there any way to get Chrome without using Google's shitty installer program, I hate it when they make you download a program so that you can download a program, what is up with that fucking shit
Don't be hating D: come to FF
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard