Judging by this trailer, it pretty much is.DrunkFace wrote:
No.[TUF]Catbox wrote:
BF3 is BFBC2 ...
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-09 … -bad/49569
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-09 … -bad/49569
In the same sense that Modern Warfare 2 is CoD6, then yes, yes it is
It doesn't fufill all of the things on that list that was leaked on BF3.
I don't see the MEC at all in BC2.
I don't see the MEC at all in BC2.
CoD4 v2 will definitely have great single player but same shitty MP as always so yea, BF2 still wins. Only when they add real vehicle usage to CoD series, they are gonna blow asses off and DICE will lose great amount of players.
you want to bet? lolDrunkFace wrote:
No.[TUF]Catbox wrote:
BF3 is BFBC2 ...
Love is the answer
Who says that info was correct? Anyone could have made up that list, nothing revolutionary on it.Acreta wrote:
It doesn't fufill all of the things on that list that was leaked on BF3.
I don't see the MEC at all in BC2.
2142 was BF3 people.
I'm waiting for BF4.
I'm waiting for BF4.
COD4 MP sucks..... hmm where have you been all these years behind the fence id say. first and foremose BF2 has more diverse MP not necesarily better MP. the Infantry only option in BF2 absolutely sucks the big dick. i tried it a few times and the large maps of BF2 doesnt feel right. try finding a but load of camping noobs in the road to Jalalabad map... COD4 excells in MP infantry battles period.. so comparing BF2 to COD4 MP is like apples to oranges. understandlegionair wrote:
CoD4 v2 will definitely have great single player but same shitty MP as always so yea, BF2 still wins. Only when they add real vehicle usage to CoD series, they are gonna blow asses off and DICE will lose great amount of players.
Well, there's your problem. It's not that it "sucks big dick", it's just that you aren't doing it right. In fact, it can be really fun; especially Ghost Town (TBU's the best). Why the hell would you do a big map on IO or a crappy map like Jalalabad. Ok it's not a bad map, just the way people play it.specialistx2324 wrote:
the Infantry only option in BF2 absolutely sucks the big dick. i tried it a few times and the large maps of BF2 doesnt feel right. try finding a but load of camping noobs in the road to Jalalabad map
Jala is win -big map with vehicles, 16 for inf
It's repetitive as hell and the maps are awful...I played it for a month before getting bored.specialistx2324 wrote:
COD4 MP sucks...
I do agree it shouldn't be compared with BF though, they're very different games...and the singleplayer was cool, if rather short.
better short and good than long and boring
lol, i like how the one dude used the shock paddles to rez his buddy. When that black hawk went down they also should have shown some guy jumpin out and pullin his chute 2 feet from the ground, ahhhhh now it's BF3!Janis_Petke wrote:
Judging by this trailer, it pretty much is.DrunkFace wrote:
No.[TUF]Catbox wrote:
BF3 is BFBC2 ...
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-09 … -bad/49569
Nature is a powerful force. Those who seek to subdue nature, never do so permanently.
I concur with .Sup Dice do something.Sup wrote:
I agree Juba
mirror's edge was pretty fantastical
Crouching massive security issues.Fat_Swinub wrote:
Sleeping studio, hidden BF3.
In terms of the amount of players that can be handled by a PS3 at least, observe the upcoming game MAG._Dominiko_PL wrote:
http://img43.imageshack.us/img43/2210/1242820971929.gif whiners.
Our situation is bad, but what can we do. Crying wont help really. Maximum limit for players is because consoles suck ass and they cant handle more. Hopefully DICE will make PC version less arcade and with more players, and this is what we should insist in asking for and asking about. Trolling about CoD won't help anyone, srsly.
The battlefield series needs a masked hero in a single player campaign
Operation Flashpoint 2 looks pretty promising