IRA vs Taliban

2009-05-30 06:44:47

#26

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7186

-=]DeatH1337[=- wrote:
usmarine wrote:
bah...having been one of the few here who actually fought at least one of them. tailbon is more willing to die.
How could you possibly know that not having fought the other?

their tactics for one

how do you know? bf2? cod? piss off

Last edited by usmarine (2009-05-30 06:45:09)

2009-05-30 06:54:52

#27

Ty: Mass Media Casualty; +2,398|7198|Noizyland

Usmarine's right. I don't see how you even need to fight them to decide which one's more willing to die anyway - Taliban blow themselves the fuck up, I'd say that proves that they're pretty damn willing to die.

[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon

2009-05-30 06:56:41

#28

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6877|The Twilight Zone

find their wives, tell Talibs to blow them self up or the wife gets hurt. All blown up=no more Talibs=IRA wins

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2009-05-30 06:59:03

#29

Bell: Frosties > Cornflakes; +362|6973|UK

.Sup wrote:
SamBo:D wrote:
sas
government supported terrorists don't count

Whats your excuse for the taliban then

zomg alCIAda

2009-05-30 07:00:41

#30

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,822|6530|eXtreme to the maX

Taliban

The IRA never fought a single real battle (sniping from the bushes and putting bombs in pubs doesn't count), and very few of them are really prepared to die for their beliefs.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-05-30 07:05:09)

Fuck Israel

2009-05-30 07:06:23

#31

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6946|...

Taliban, they are willing to kill themselves, and probably need less far less resources.

(edit: and they don't get drunk)

Last edited by jsnipy (2009-05-30 07:06:43)

2009-05-30 07:08:36

#32

seymorebutts443: Ready for combat; +211|7019|Belchertown Massachusetts, USA

.Sup wrote:
find their wives, tell Talibs to blow them self up or the wife gets hurt. All blown up=no more Talibs=IRA wins

and by wives you mean goats and camels.

2009-05-30 07:08:57

#33

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6877|The Twilight Zone

jsnipy wrote:
Taliban, they are willing to kill themselves, and probably need less far less resources.

(edit: and they don't get drunk)

and they don't need sex so theres less chance for them to get exposed

2009-05-30 07:11:12

#34

IG-Calibre: comhalta; +226|7166|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann

number of British troops killed in Afghanistan = 160 in 8 years = avg 20 per year

number of British troops killed here by IRA 673 - in total 1123 members of British security forces were killed 60% of that number are accredited to the IRA (republican Groupings) = average of roughly 20 per yer

So I say tie in military terms - however the grizzly task of statistics regarding innocent victims of both groupings i'd say the Taliban far exceed the ra in terms of Terror..

(granted the whole this is pretty fucking tasteless though)

2009-05-30 07:17:57

#35

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,822|6530|eXtreme to the maX

If the British had been allowed to call in airstrikes each time they heard a gunshot in Armagh I'm pretty sure their casualties would have been a lot lower and the IRA would have crapped themselves and given up after about twenty minutes.

It would only take the Taliban skinning alive one or two provos and the rest would suddenly decide they'd much rather be British.

Fuck Israel

2009-05-30 08:47:54

#36

cl4u53w1t2: Salon-Bolschewist; +269|6897|Kakanien

easy question. taliban outnumber the ira by far, so they'll win

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2oh3h3DvY0

2009-05-30 08:57:32

#37

jsnipy: ...; +3,277|6946|...

IRA might stand a chance if they teamed up with Dutch Cartooinsts

2009-05-30 09:23:33

#38

Doctor Strangelove: Real Battlefield Veterinarian.; +1,758|6892

You guys fail the understand that the purpose of "Deadliest Warrior" isn't to find out which army would win, but which individual soldier.

In that case the IRA are better disciplined and tend to have better equipment.

2009-05-30 09:27:27

#39

(HUN)Rudebwoy: Member; +45|7179

Well the IRA wins in propaganda songs thats for damn sure
Taliban:

IRA:

No offense to the brits.

Last edited by (HUN)Rudebwoy (2009-05-30 09:28:17)

2009-05-30 09:28:05

#40

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7186

(HUN)Rudebwoy wrote:
Well the IRA wins in propaganda songs thats for damn sure
Taliban:
S5MHY3b4dFc

IRA:
nHY14OVk7r0
2rgRg6j8mQo

No offense to the brits.

erm

2009-05-30 09:28:48

#41

(HUN)Rudebwoy: Member; +45|7179

^fixed

2009-05-30 09:55:53

#42

JdeFalconr: Lex Luthor, King of Australia; +72|6966|Sammamish, WA

I can agree only that this is one of the more tasteless stories I've seen. I'm glad our fine country is so well represented by it.

2009-05-30 09:57:47

#43

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7186

JdeFalconr wrote:
I can agree only that this is one of the more tasteless stories I've seen. I'm glad our fine country is so well represented by it.

shut up

2009-05-30 10:15:14

#44

War Man: Australians are hermaphrodites.; +564|7138|Purplicious Wisconsin

usmarine wrote:
JdeFalconr wrote:
I can agree only that this is one of the more tasteless stories I've seen. I'm glad our fine country is so well represented by it.
shut up

The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.

2009-05-30 10:23:38