.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6716|The Twilight Zone

Bell wrote:

.Sup wrote:

So Martyn will this card be used for gaming, movies, music, everything and if so what is the most important thing for you-effects or quality, low jitter sound?
Looking for as much of an all rounder as possible, but, more ofthen than not I just listen to music when I come in, so got more of a bias on that front, dont watch movies on my PC.  Though I would like something that can do all these effects in games, since I keep hearing people talk about how good they are.......

Would like to avoid tiny sound as much as possible, effects are nice but am not overly concerned about them.
If you do watch movies are they dvix or DVDs? Just want to know whether you need any Dolby effects or not. Also you will be using the card with both speakers and headphones?
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6460|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:


the tube part really is funny I should put this in my sig on all audio forums where I post
Are you saying tube amps are there for reference sound reproduction?
no although most high end stereo amps have tubes inside its body
No.

The vacuum tube is a very slow "semiconductor". It takes many times longer to switch than a transistor, thus adding a certain amount of distortion to any high-frequency signal it is processing. Tubes are still used due to the fact that they add that slight distortion, giving them a "warm" and unique sound. Many people, me included, like that sound, and thus have kept tubes on the market. Tubes are, however, nowhere near transistors when it comes to true reference fidelity. It's physically impossible.

Are tubes a nice niche? Yes, very. Are tubes good for accurate audio reproduction? Hell no!
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6716|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:


Are you saying tube amps are there for reference sound reproduction?
no although most high end stereo amps have tubes inside its body
No.

The vacuum tube is a very slow "semiconductor". It takes many times longer to switch than a transistor, thus adding a certain amount of distortion to any high-frequency signal it is processing. Tubes are still used due to the fact that they add that slight distortion, giving them a "warm" and unique sound. Many people, me included, like that sound, and thus have kept tubes on the market. Tubes are, however, nowhere near transistors when it comes to true reference fidelity. It's physically impossible.

Are tubes a nice niche? Yes, very. Are tubes good for accurate audio reproduction? Hell no!
http://www.audioresearch.com/ref610T.html
i think you got screwed by a goat
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6812|UK

.Sup wrote:

Bell wrote:

.Sup wrote:

So Martyn will this card be used for gaming, movies, music, everything and if so what is the most important thing for you-effects or quality, low jitter sound?
Looking for as much of an all rounder as possible, but, more ofthen than not I just listen to music when I come in, so got more of a bias on that front, dont watch movies on my PC.  Though I would like something that can do all these effects in games, since I keep hearing people talk about how good they are.......

Would like to avoid tiny sound as much as possible, effects are nice but am not overly concerned about them.
If you do watch movies are they dvix or DVDs? Just want to know whether you need any Dolby effects or not. Also you will be using the card with both speakers and headphones?
DVDs, but, I almost exclusivly watch DVDs and blu rays through my actual home cinema set up.  I have a Yamaha RX-V1900 receiver for all of that so it's no worry really.  And as I said, so long as the sound card has the optical or coax out I can send it to the receiver should I need to (yes?).

I'd use the card for both the speakers and headphones yeah (although obv not at the same time).
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6716|The Twilight Zone

Bell wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Bell wrote:


Looking for as much of an all rounder as possible, but, more ofthen than not I just listen to music when I come in, so got more of a bias on that front, dont watch movies on my PC.  Though I would like something that can do all these effects in games, since I keep hearing people talk about how good they are.......

Would like to avoid tiny sound as much as possible, effects are nice but am not overly concerned about them.
If you do watch movies are they dvix or DVDs? Just want to know whether you need any Dolby effects or not. Also you will be using the card with both speakers and headphones?
DVDs, but, I almost exclusivly watch DVDs and blu rays through my actual home cinema set up.  I have a Yamaha RX-V1900 receiver for all of that so it's no worry really.  And as I said, so long as the sound card has the optical or coax out I can send it to the receiver should I need to (yes?).

I'd use the card for both the speakers and headphones yeah (although obv not at the same time).
Ok cool
next questions:
What speakers and headphones do you have?
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6812|UK

.Sup wrote:

Bell wrote:

.Sup wrote:

If you do watch movies are they dvix or DVDs? Just want to know whether you need any Dolby effects or not. Also you will be using the card with both speakers and headphones?
DVDs, but, I almost exclusivly watch DVDs and blu rays through my actual home cinema set up.  I have a Yamaha RX-V1900 receiver for all of that so it's no worry really.  And as I said, so long as the sound card has the optical or coax out I can send it to the receiver should I need to (yes?).

I'd use the card for both the speakers and headphones yeah (although obv not at the same time).
Ok cool
next questions:
What speakers and headphones do you have?
Speakers for the PC?  Logitech Z-10s.  I dont have any headphones at the moment (nor earphones for my iphone, which I wanted suggestions for aswell).
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6460|Winland

Bell wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Bell wrote:

Looking for as much of an all rounder as possible, but, more ofthen than not I just listen to music when I come in, so got more of a bias on that front, dont watch movies on my PC.  Though I would like something that can do all these effects in games, since I keep hearing people talk about how good they are.......

Would like to avoid tiny sound as much as possible, effects are nice but am not overly concerned about them.
If you do watch movies are they dvix or DVDs? Just want to know whether you need any Dolby effects or not. Also you will be using the card with both speakers and headphones?
DVDs, but, I almost exclusivly watch DVDs and blu rays through my actual home cinema set up.  I have a Yamaha RX-V1900 receiver for all of that so it's no worry really.  And as I said, so long as the sound card has the optical or coax out I can send it to the receiver should I need to (yes?).

I'd use the card for both the speakers and headphones yeah (although obv not at the same time).
I think Auzentech would be a good option if you're also looking for game effects and stuff. Perhaps also get a headphone amp. With the Z-10s, I doubt you'll hear a lot of difference between different cards, so I think it's a better option to go full-out on headphones and optional amp.

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

no although most high end stereo amps have tubes inside its body
No.

The vacuum tube is a very slow "semiconductor". It takes many times longer to switch than a transistor, thus adding a certain amount of distortion to any high-frequency signal it is processing. Tubes are still used due to the fact that they add that slight distortion, giving them a "warm" and unique sound. Many people, me included, like that sound, and thus have kept tubes on the market. Tubes are, however, nowhere near transistors when it comes to true reference fidelity. It's physically impossible.

Are tubes a nice niche? Yes, very. Are tubes good for accurate audio reproduction? Hell no!
http://www.audioresearch.com/ref610T.html
i think you got screwed by a goat
That amplifier is quite good indeed, but it's still got that tube noise. Look at the specs. 0.5% distortion at 600W, 0.05% at 1W. It's good, I'm not doubting that, but from a completely reference standpoint, it's still far from a good SS. And the price, fuck. $40 000.

My ~$1000 SS power amplifier can push almost 300WPC into 4Ohm. At 0.01%. When going that high-spec with tubes, they become incredibly uneconomical.

Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2009-05-31 07:27:57)

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6716|The Twilight Zone

Bell wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Bell wrote:

DVDs, but, I almost exclusivly watch DVDs and blu rays through my actual home cinema set up.  I have a Yamaha RX-V1900 receiver for all of that so it's no worry really.  And as I said, so long as the sound card has the optical or coax out I can send it to the receiver should I need to (yes?).

I'd use the card for both the speakers and headphones yeah (although obv not at the same time).
Ok cool
next questions:
What speakers and headphones do you have?
Speakers for the PC?  Logitech Z-10s.  I dont have any headphones at the moment (nor earphones for my iphone, which I wanted suggestions for aswell).
I you want Xonar this might be a good choice http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=z … templete=2
BUT: its expensive (i think you should state a budget) and I'm not sure how you switch between speaker and headphone volume controls. Cos it would suck if while listening to speakers your headphones would also play. If I were you I would get a DAC with two analog outputs and a headphone amplifier. That way you could control both each with its own controls- the Logitech with its own controller and the headphones with the headamp's volume pot. Let me know what you think, there are also a couple of very affordable DAC/headamp combo setups out there and if you don't need all those effects then this is the perfect choice and a DAC also lets you do spdif passthrough to your receiver.

Last edited by .Sup (2009-05-31 07:34:38)

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6844|SE London

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:


no although most high end stereo amps have tubes inside its body
No.

The vacuum tube is a very slow "semiconductor". It takes many times longer to switch than a transistor, thus adding a certain amount of distortion to any high-frequency signal it is processing. Tubes are still used due to the fact that they add that slight distortion, giving them a "warm" and unique sound. Many people, me included, like that sound, and thus have kept tubes on the market. Tubes are, however, nowhere near transistors when it comes to true reference fidelity. It's physically impossible.

Are tubes a nice niche? Yes, very. Are tubes good for accurate audio reproduction? Hell no!
http://www.audioresearch.com/ref610T.html
i think you got screwed by a goat
Freezer is totally right. You're never going to get the same fidelity from a valve that you'll get from solid state transistors. It's just easier to get better fidelity from transistors. Which is one reason we don't use valves for computers anymore.

That said, they're a damn sight more durable.
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6716|The Twilight Zone

Bertster7 wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:


No.

The vacuum tube is a very slow "semiconductor". It takes many times longer to switch than a transistor, thus adding a certain amount of distortion to any high-frequency signal it is processing. Tubes are still used due to the fact that they add that slight distortion, giving them a "warm" and unique sound. Many people, me included, like that sound, and thus have kept tubes on the market. Tubes are, however, nowhere near transistors when it comes to true reference fidelity. It's physically impossible.

Are tubes a nice niche? Yes, very. Are tubes good for accurate audio reproduction? Hell no!
http://www.audioresearch.com/ref610T.html
i think you got screwed by a goat
Freezer is totally right. You're never going to get the same fidelity from a valve that you'll get from solid state transistors. It's just easier to get better fidelity from transistors. Which is one reason we don't use valves for computers anymore.

That said, they're a damn sight more durable.
Its easier? Whats that got to do with sound? 70% of music lovers prefer tube amps. Some headphones/speakers sound better with SS amp, some sound better with tube amps. You cannot say one is better than the other.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6460|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

.Sup wrote:


http://www.audioresearch.com/ref610T.html
i think you got screwed by a goat
Freezer is totally right. You're never going to get the same fidelity from a valve that you'll get from solid state transistors. It's just easier to get better fidelity from transistors. Which is one reason we don't use valves for computers anymore.

That said, they're a damn sight more durable.
Its easier? Whats that got to do with sound? 70% of music lovers prefer tube amps. Some headphones/speakers sound better with SS amp, some sound better with tube amps. You cannot say one is better than the other.
From a purely technological standpoint, SS is superior! They can produce more accurate sound for less money! The only reason tubes still exist, is that people enjoy the distortion they add!
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6812|UK

.Sup wrote:

(i think you should state a budget).
Hmm, well am aware the sound card would be the most expensive so I aloted, a max of say, £150 for that, and I thought another £100 would cover, headphones, earphones and a mic.

Ofcourse any savings on one, I could plough into another, that sound card I believe is £150 on OCUK, will dig around some more.

Martyn
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6716|The Twilight Zone

Bell wrote:

.Sup wrote:

(i think you should state a budget).
Hmm, well am aware the sound card would be the most expensive so I aloted, a max of say, £150 for that, and I thought another £100 would cover, headphones, earphones and a mic.

Ofcourse any savings on one, I could plough into another, that sound card I believe is £150 on OCUK, will dig around some more.

Martyn
I personally would get this card with your budget: http://www.htomega.com/clarohalo.html
Not sure if any are sold in UK, you'd have to do some research

I forgot about this: http://www.beresford.me/main/main.html
Navigate to TC7520 model which has a USB input: Its a DAC (sound card to make it clearer) and also has a headamp. + you get to passthough digital signal. I have its
Mr Beresford is from UK so shipping would be cheap and fast

Last edited by .Sup (2009-05-31 07:53:30)

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6460|Winland

Bell wrote:

.Sup wrote:

(i think you should state a budget).
Hmm, well am aware the sound card would be the most expensive so I aloted, a max of say, £150 for that, and I thought another £100 would cover, headphones, earphones and a mic.

Ofcourse any savings on one, I could plough into another, that sound card I believe is £150 on OCUK, will dig around some more.

Martyn
For a budget like that, it's quite hard to find a well-balanced combo. The only easily available headphone-amp card in the UK seems to be the Essence STX, but it's already £150. If you get it, you're left with only £100 for phones, which is in the lower range

If the DAC .Sup posted is available, it's certainly an option. The question is just the price, which is higher as the Essence STX.

Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2009-05-31 07:56:37)

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6716|The Twilight Zone

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Bell wrote:

.Sup wrote:

(i think you should state a budget).
Hmm, well am aware the sound card would be the most expensive so I aloted, a max of say, £150 for that, and I thought another £100 would cover, headphones, earphones and a mic.

Ofcourse any savings on one, I could plough into another, that sound card I believe is £150 on OCUK, will dig around some more.

Martyn
For a budget like that, it's quite hard to find a well-balanced combo. The only easily available headphone-amp card in the UK seems to be the Essence STX, but it's already £150. If you get it, you're left with only £100 for phones, which is in the lower range

If the DAC .Sup posted is available, it's certainly an option. The question is just the price, which is the same as the Essence STX, it seems.
HA its    
£149.99
fits in Martyn's budget perfectly.
I could post some pics if you want.
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6460|Winland

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Bell wrote:


Hmm, well am aware the sound card would be the most expensive so I aloted, a max of say, £150 for that, and I thought another £100 would cover, headphones, earphones and a mic.

Ofcourse any savings on one, I could plough into another, that sound card I believe is £150 on OCUK, will dig around some more.

Martyn
For a budget like that, it's quite hard to find a well-balanced combo. The only easily available headphone-amp card in the UK seems to be the Essence STX, but it's already £150. If you get it, you're left with only £100 for phones, which is in the lower range

If the DAC .Sup posted is available, it's certainly an option. The question is just the price, which is the same as the Essence STX, it seems.
HA its    
£149.99
fits in Martyn's budget perfectly.
I could post some pics if you want.
£150 excluding VAT. With british VAT, the final price is £175 without shipping.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6812|UK

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

For a budget like that, it's quite hard to find a well-balanced combo. The only easily available headphone-amp card in the UK seems to be the Essence STX, but it's already £150. If you get it, you're left with only £100 for phones, which is in the lower range

If the DAC .Sup posted is available, it's certainly an option. The question is just the price, which is the same as the Essence STX, it seems.
HA its    
£149.99
fits in Martyn's budget perfectly.
I could post some pics if you want.
£150 excluding VAT. With british VAT, the final price is £175 without shipping.
Well, I get a lot of my stuff from a specialist my dad used to always use (family friend if you like).  He always gives me descent deals since bought a lot of stuff over the years.  If I could get some sort of list, say option one, this card these headphones, option two, this card those headphones etc, I can take a print out in and see if what prices he is going to do.  Your generally looking at an average of 20% off so that takes care of VAT.

Imports wouldnt be that much of an issue, I could just get them attached to the imports he brings in anyway.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6844|SE London

Freezer7Pro wrote:

.Sup wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:


Freezer is totally right. You're never going to get the same fidelity from a valve that you'll get from solid state transistors. It's just easier to get better fidelity from transistors. Which is one reason we don't use valves for computers anymore.

That said, they're a damn sight more durable.
Its easier? Whats that got to do with sound? 70% of music lovers prefer tube amps. Some headphones/speakers sound better with SS amp, some sound better with tube amps. You cannot say one is better than the other.
From a purely technological standpoint, SS is superior! They can produce more accurate sound for less money! The only reason tubes still exist, is that people enjoy the distortion they add!
Exactly. I'm not too up on the audio side of things, but I understand the differing qualities of transitors and valves. It's gonna be harder to get accuracy with valves than transistors.
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6812|UK

So what about actual head and earphones?  Any recomendations of brand etc?
Freezer7Pro
I don't come here a lot anymore.
+1,447|6460|Winland

Bell wrote:

So what about actual head and earphones?  Any recomendations of brand etc?
If in doubt, get Sennheisers. They don't really have any bad ones.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Gooners
Wiki Contributor
+2,700|6895

Sennheiser HD555
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6812|UK

Gooners wrote:

Sennheiser HD555
I was looking at them actually, seems alright, the Goldring DR150 Stereo Headphones are about the same price on OCUK, anyone had experience with them?  There almost exactly the same price so either or doesnt fuss me.
Gooners
Wiki Contributor
+2,700|6895

Bell wrote:

Gooners wrote:

Sennheiser HD555
I was looking at them actually, seems alright, the Goldring DR150 Stereo Headphones are about the same price on OCUK, anyone had experience with them?  There almost exactly the same price so either or doesnt fuss me.
Sup and Max them, apparently they're extremely comfy.
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6830|NYC / Hamburg

I have HD555s and love them. They are very comfortable, even after long (12h+) sessions. As expected the sound is great too. Then again I'm not a huge audiophile ...
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
Bell
Frosties > Cornflakes
+362|6812|UK

Are they adjustable btw?  I have a big head xD

And what about the earphones, I wouldnt wear the 555s when am out and about.

Last edited by Bell (2009-05-31 11:05:18)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard