Gooners?trex1210 wrote:
I am reknowned for acting like 'MR.Tough Guy' when I am drunk. Me and my friends usually walk up town after the house party died down at like 3 in the morning to go get some pizza (this place stays open so it can get some business from drunks on fridays), after the pizza I yell and call every Indian that I see down and usually get into a big fight and get my ass kicked.
All fun though.
Haha oh God, please don't say you're serious... it'll take some serious digging to find photos of some of them!Ataronchronon wrote:
I was implying in a joking manner that English chicks aren't exactly known for their good looks and that to hook up with one could be considered a deed of infamy. Failed attempt at humor aside, I do understand what you're talking about, but I think we're going to need to see some pictures if we're to believe your claims of getting with all the hot girls.Uzique wrote:
They were obviously English, as I went to an English school . I wouldn't say "sought after" in the sense that I was sleeping with supermodels and the nation's finest... what I meant is, I quickly gained a reputation within my friendship circle and school as the guy that would go for the publically-known 'hot girls'. Do you not understand what I'm talking about? I thought every school playground all over the world had a 'hotness hierarchy' or the like; I was always 'that' guy with the girl that all his friend's wanted in on as well. It brings kudos and ego-points but also brings competition and some shit vibes -- hence the 'infamous' trait. I'm not going to profess to be an international pornstar, I just meant I always hooked up with the cream of the bunch, which put me on top of the alpha-male ladder but also hated because many other people wanted in on it. School politics, love it. Miss it, even. Nowadays at Uni everyone just digs who they dig... ugly kids dig ugly chicks, geeky kids hook up with geeky chicks... there's no small-scale sense of the 'ladder' and 'cool list'. At least the selection of fiiiine honeys has gone up significantly in number .Ataronchronon wrote:
So are you infamous for sleeping with sought after girls, or infamous for sleeping with English girls?
Last edited by menzo2003 (2009-06-21 13:12:31)
Tell that to my ex!Uzique wrote:
Nowadays at Uni everyone just digs who they dig... ugly kids dig ugly chicks, geeky kids hook up with geeky chicks... there's no small-scale sense of the 'ladder' and 'cool list'.
Not necessarily a bad thing. It's one of the main reasons I'm almost always single. There have been plenty of chicks who have been into me, but I always set my standards high.... too high. So high that I'll only settle for the best, yet these ladies are way out of my leagueUzique wrote:
Nowadays at Uni everyone just digs who they dig... ugly kids dig ugly chicks, geeky kids hook up with geeky chicks... there's no small-scale sense of the 'ladder' and 'cool list'.
t0mhank5 wrote:
Farting
12/f/taiwan wrote:
Gooners?trex1210 wrote:
I am reknowned for acting like 'MR.Tough Guy' when I am drunk. Me and my friends usually walk up town after the house party died down at like 3 in the morning to go get some pizza (this place stays open so it can get some business from drunks on fridays), after the pizza I yell and call every Indian that I see down and usually get into a big fight and get my ass kicked.
All fun though.
Hmmm,.. recognizable. For me personally it is not that I deliberately aim up, I simply do not tend to be interested in "average" girls. I am never "on the lookout", I only go in pursuit when I actually like a girl I accidentally bump into so to say. For some reason they have always been quite above "average". I guess she always has to be out of league, or out of reach for another reason, because I need the challenge. I also find that I have actually raised my standards over time.mtb0minime wrote:
Not necessarily a bad thing. It's one of the main reasons I'm almost always single. There have been plenty of chicks who have been into me, but I always set my standards high.... too high. So high that I'll only settle for the best, yet these ladies are way out of my league
Yes! I'm the same way. I'm not really on the prowl, just wait for girls I like to come along.Lai wrote:
Hmmm,.. recognizable. For me personally it is not that I deliberately aim up, I simply do not tend to be interested in "average" girls. I am never "on the lookout", I only go in pursuit when I actually like a girl I accidentally bump into so to say. For some reason they have always been quite above "average". I guess she always has to be out of league, or out of reach for another reason, because I need the challenge. I also find that I have actually raised my standards over time.mtb0minime wrote:
Not necessarily a bad thing. It's one of the main reasons I'm almost always single. There have been plenty of chicks who have been into me, but I always set my standards high.... too high. So high that I'll only settle for the best, yet these ladies are way out of my league
You actually sound a lot like me, bennis, which is really fucking surprising. But an honest character summary.bennisboy wrote:
I'm known for being an outrageous flirt and often teasing girls by playing hard to get. I once had a girl call me a cunt cos I wouldnt pull her
I'm also known as a slut, who gets the girls my mates like, sleeps with them, then gets bored of them
Work that one out.
I'm also known for being rather good at most sports, got me quite a lot of haters back in school. I was the school sports captain
Those that dont know me think I'm loud and arrogant
Those tha do know me think I'm more quiet, but still arrogant. Altho I'm no longer quiet, jus used to be
One advantage though: epic quests make for epic stories!mtb0minime wrote:
Yes! I'm the same way. I'm not really on the prowl, just wait for girls I like to come along.Lai wrote:
Hmmm,.. recognizable. For me personally it is not that I deliberately aim up, I simply do not tend to be interested in "average" girls. I am never "on the lookout", I only go in pursuit when I actually like a girl I accidentally bump into so to say. For some reason they have always been quite above "average". I guess she always has to be out of league, or out of reach for another reason, because I need the challenge. I also find that I have actually raised my standards over time.mtb0minime wrote:
Not necessarily a bad thing. It's one of the main reasons I'm almost always single. There have been plenty of chicks who have been into me, but I always set my standards high.... too high. So high that I'll only settle for the best, yet these ladies are way out of my league
Plus I noticed that I like the hotter women because when it comes to girls, I want ones that I can't have. I've had feelings for many girls who were taken, as well as ridiculously hot girls that are out of my league. I don't do it intentionally, I just can't help it.
True people often think I'm arrogant too, many of my friends are also percieved as arrogant. I think it's a socialist European thing where people with self esteem that have something to say that deviates from the commonly accepted and actually speak it out are automatically classified as arrogant. It is the way of "tolerant" leftwing to deal with "intolerant" others.Uzique wrote:
People that know me don't think I'm arrogant either, but people that don't know me perceive me (according to my gf's honest evaluation) as someone that has an unnerving quietness that seems either judgmental/elitist, or very intelligent and shrewd with my words. Which is pretty funny considering how verbose I am on here to a bunch of suck-ass total strangers. My friends that do get to know me would probably attribute what is at first seen as arrogance as something more just like depth, complexity, and a bit of a dead-serious cunt at times. Yay.
Last edited by Lai (2009-06-21 15:08:17)
I'm the same way man. At times I wish my standards weren't so high, but it's not something I can help and I'd rather have standards that are too high than too low.mtb0minime wrote:
Not necessarily a bad thing. It's one of the main reasons I'm almost always single. There have been plenty of chicks who have been into me, but I always set my standards high.... too high. So high that I'll only settle for the best, yet these ladies are way out of my league
Haha, robot... ouch man, you've got to learn to melt! I'm glad my silent thoughtfulness gets interpreted as being intimidating superciliousness... it's like an effortless ego-booster, I don't even consciously realise I'm doing it .Ataronchronon wrote:
I'm the same way man. At times I wish my standards weren't so high, but it's not something I can help and I'd rather have standards that are too high than too low.mtb0minime wrote:
Not necessarily a bad thing. It's one of the main reasons I'm almost always single. There have been plenty of chicks who have been into me, but I always set my standards high.... too high. So high that I'll only settle for the best, yet these ladies are way out of my league
Anyway, I guess you could say I'm somewhat known for rarely showing emotion. I'm like Uzique in that I tend to be quiet and serious, but people perceive me as robotic rather than arrogant. Even my mother thinks I'm a robot.
whatUzique wrote:
superciliousness
Learn to melt? Do explain.Uzique wrote:
Haha, robot... ouch man, you've got to learn to melt! I'm glad my silent thoughtfulness gets interpreted as being intimidating superciliousness... it's like an effortless ego-booster, I don't even consciously realise I'm doing it .Ataronchronon wrote:
I'm the same way man. At times I wish my standards weren't so high, but it's not something I can help and I'd rather have standards that are too high than too low.mtb0minime wrote:
Not necessarily a bad thing. It's one of the main reasons I'm almost always single. There have been plenty of chicks who have been into me, but I always set my standards high.... too high. So high that I'll only settle for the best, yet these ladies are way out of my league
Anyway, I guess you could say I'm somewhat known for rarely showing emotion. I'm like Uzique in that I tend to be quiet and serious, but people perceive me as robotic rather than arrogant. Even my mother thinks I'm a robot.
I guess emotional response being likened to a 'robot' = loosen up, "melt", gel more etc. There is obviously a marked difference in people's perceptions between a quiet guy who is just thinking and doesn't have a lot to say, and a quiet guy who is quiet out of submissiveness and social awkwardness. Not to say you're socially stunted... I'm just saying, being read as 'robotic' is clearly not a flattering trait!Ataronchronon wrote:
Learn to melt? Do explain.Uzique wrote:
Haha, robot... ouch man, you've got to learn to melt! I'm glad my silent thoughtfulness gets interpreted as being intimidating superciliousness... it's like an effortless ego-booster, I don't even consciously realise I'm doing it .Ataronchronon wrote:
I'm the same way man. At times I wish my standards weren't so high, but it's not something I can help and I'd rather have standards that are too high than too low.
Anyway, I guess you could say I'm somewhat known for rarely showing emotion. I'm like Uzique in that I tend to be quiet and serious, but people perceive me as robotic rather than arrogant. Even my mother thinks I'm a robot.
su·per·cil·i·ous (spr-sl-s) adj. Feeling or showing haughty disdain