Benzin
Member
+576|6421
DETROIT (Reuters) - A new General Motors emerged from bankruptcy protection on Friday -- far more quickly than most industry-watchers had expected -- as a leaner automaker pledging to win back American consumers and pay back taxpayers.

A whirlwind 40-day bankruptcy for GM concluded with the closing of a deal that sold key operations to a new company that is majority-owned by the U.S. Treasury.

The closing documents were signed early Friday by representatives of the government and GM executives at the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges, GM's bankruptcy counsel.

The development, which follows a similar fast-track reorganization of Chrysler, represented a victory for the Obama administration and its commitment to save jobs and prevent a liquidation of the largest U.S. automaker.

At the same time, the U.S. government has taken on substantial new risks as a 60 percent owner of the new GM with a $50 billion equity investment and $10 billion in debt and perpetual preferred shares.

Analysts said the government intervention had given GM a new chance and sharply lower operating costs but left management facing deep challenges given the weak economy and GM's long-running slide in market share.

"I wouldn't really call it a new GM, it is just a smaller GM. That would be more of an apt description. They still have a lot of hurdles to jump," said Mirko Mikelic, portfolio manager at Fifth Third Bank. "Right now, they are in a survival mode."

Chief Executive Fritz Henderson said the new company would shed layers of management, make decisions faster and shed the bureaucracy that critics say contributed to the failure of the 100-year-old automaker.

The company's white-collar work force will be cut by more than 20 percent by eliminating 6,000 jobs. Executive ranks will be cut 35 percent.

"The bottom line is that business as usual -- and as we have had it until today -- is over," Henderson told reporters at GM's Detroit headquarters. "Everyone associated with GM must be prepared to change -- and fast."

Bankruptcy slashed GM's debt and healthcare obligations and brought down labor costs to be on par with Japanese competitors led by Toyota Motor Corp.

Analysts said that gives GM a chance to deliver on its commitment to launch more fuel-efficient cars and to focus its resources on fewer brands, models and dealerships.

"The legacy costs are gone. The challenge in the future is how to approach a marketplace that has been burned by GM," said Pete Hastings, senior vice president and fixed-income analyst at Morgan Keegan.

While key assets and the Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC brands were sold out of bankruptcy to form the new General Motors Company, other assets, including shuttered factories, remain in bankruptcy for a liquidation process.

That old GM, which will become Motors Liquidation Co, is expected to stay in bankruptcy for years.

Bondholders, who had been owed $27 billion, could eventually receive a 10 percent stake in the new GM.

The U.S. Treasury will own 60.8 percent and 11.7 percent will be owned by the governments of Canada and Ontario. A retiree trust fund affiliated with the United Auto Workers union will hold 17.5 percent.

NEW GM, NEW CULTURE?

Henderson, who took over as CEO when predecessor Rick Wagoner was ousted by the Obama administration at the end of March, said the company would be run by a single executive committee, cutting the number of top decision-makers in half.

GM also eliminated the North American executive team overseeing operations in its troubled home market which had caused the automaker to lose more than $80 billion since 2005.

Nick Reilly, who has headed Asian operations, will take control of GM's international operations based in Shanghai, a recognition of the growing importance of China at a time when GM is selling its European unit, Opel.

Bob Lutz, 77, GM's outspoken and high-profile former product chief, agreed to stay on in a new position with responsibility for marketing, communications and a continued role in vehicle design.

Dennis Virag, an analyst at Automotive Consulting Group, said Henderson would be judged by GM's new board and others on his success in reforming a corporate culture that was blamed for having stymied innovation and bred inefficiency.

"Does he have the habits of the old GM or is he capable of providing the new leadership? I think he has to demonstrate that," he said of Henderson.

The White House has also disbursed almost $80 billion to shore up the auto industry, including $5 billion in support for auto parts suppliers.

Chrysler exited bankruptcy a month ago after blazing a precedent-setting trail for GM by following an asset sale plan that gave operational control of the smaller automaker to Italy's Fiat SpA.

The new GM will have slashed its debt and healthcare obligations by $48 billion, dropped almost 40 percent of the dealers from an unprofitable network and moved to sell laggard brands such as Saab, Saturn and Hummer.

(Reporting by Kevin Krolicki; Additional reporting by Caroline Humer and Jui Chakravorty Das; Editing by Patrick Fitzgibbons, Lisa Von Ahn and Matthew Lewis)
So does anyone really think this will save GM? I can't see GM making good cars for many years to come ... honestly quite concerned if the US government invested their money correctly. But if they pull it off, 60% ownership would make for some NICE profits ...
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7184

they will fail.  plain and simple.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7003|SE London

Wave bye bye to another $60 billion.....
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7184

no rly.  when some gets paid 40+ dollars an hour to turn a bolt, then you will fail.
Swan
The town bike
+54|5869

Bertster7 wrote:

Wave bye bye to another $60 billion.....
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7184

Bertster7 wrote:

Wave bye bye to another $60 billion.....
well i said the bail outs and stimulus was a waste but people on this site yelled at me for that.

well, prepare to suck it.  (you know who you are)  the stimulus already failed, so i have been 50% correct.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7003|SE London

usmarine wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Wave bye bye to another $60 billion.....
well i said the bail outs and stimulus was a waste but people on this site yelled at me for that.

well, prepare to suck it.  (you know who you are)  the stimulus already failed, so i have been 50% correct.
Bailing out banks in some cases is sensible, because they are integral to the financial system and if you don't help some critical ones you could end up with big problems. The bailout plan itself, was shit and far too costly.

The cost to each taxpayer of all this crap is probably about $5000. So any of you working in the US and paying taxes, think about the fact you're paying about $5000 each for all this bailout rubbish.

It's not much better over here though....

I remember £2000 per tax payer was a figure that was getting thrown around a lot. When you think of it in those terms, as the government spending that much of your money on these things, it is pretty galling.
Benzin
Member
+576|6421
You gotta remember one thing, though, Bertster. The US government does take in quite a bit of taxes (not as much as most European governments, though), but then does not spend them accordingly. The State governments typically do a better job on the whole, but the Federal government is absolute shit about the whole thing and cannot spend or invest money in anything.

The auto bailout should have never been done, though. Certainly money for new, green technology (like Tesla's stuff), but having GM being bailed out was an absolute failure. The Big Three had been losing money for decades and never (in my memory, at least) took any drastic measures to change things.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7184

i used to think states can do a better job.  now i am not so sure.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|7003|SE London

CapnNismo wrote:

You gotta remember one thing, though, Bertster. The US government does take in quite a bit of taxes (not as much as most European governments, though), but then does not spend them accordingly. The State governments typically do a better job on the whole, but the Federal government is absolute shit about the whole thing and cannot spend or invest money in anything.

The auto bailout should have never been done, though. Certainly money for new, green technology (like Tesla's stuff), but having GM being bailed out was an absolute failure. The Big Three had been losing money for decades and never (in my memory, at least) took any drastic measures to change things.
Certainly seems that way.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7023|132 and Bush

good.. start re-hiring asap
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6970|San Diego, CA, USA
I still won't buy their car...even the Camaro.
TopHat01
Limitless
+117|6327|CA

Harmor wrote:

I still won't buy their car...even the Camaro.
The new Camaro is sex on wheels...
Roger Lesboules
Ah ben tabarnak!
+316|6999|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!

Harmor wrote:

I still won't buy their car...even the Camaro.
This is a reason why they have a hard time...American spit on their own car producer.

American customer buying american car should have some sort of advantage...like reduced cost or things like that, something to make the american customer buy their own brand...not those crap rice burner and shit.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|7043|London, England
Federal Motors


Nothing like the prestige of the US Federal Government to give it that quality assurance...

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard