BF2S Forums Chemistry Help

alexb wrote:

Jonaphatus wrote:

You have to be kidding.....

IT'S FOOKING LOGIC.

Right, you might not understand some of the tems.

But all it is.

To simplify...

A Human.  1 head... 1 body... 2 arms... 2 legs...

If I have 100 heads 120 bodies 400 arms and 600 legs.......... How many Humans could I make !!!!!!

Chemistry, Just try and make it something tangible.

It's pretty obvious that only 100 humans "are" available........... Chemistry!!!!

So before you start throwing cr@p around because you haven't "wrapped" your head around it.... SHUT IT

1+1=2 2x2=4 and so forth...at least until you get into advanced math.... NOT CHEMISTRY

Then start b!tching, cause that's when things start getting seriously fooked up.

So Flammable, inflammable who knew???

Please Alex, If you have anymore "problems"... Lets see if we can't wrap your head around it.

Cheers

Jona

I didn't understand 3,4, and 6. To my knowledge, those don't only involve limiting reactants and reagents.
And to be honest, I spent almost an hour trying to solve the answers, it's been over 4 months since I last did any Stoichiometry.

Jonaphatus wrote:

To an extent his criticisms apply on those problems though... They may not be limited but its still a case of I have 100 arms, how many people can that make if each needs 2...

But he is still a huge douche, and I would be willing to bet that others could make similar criticisms issues he struggles with, be it in science or some other topic.


Fair Enough... But since you bring on a world of trouble by your innate response, which some how completely bypasses the original posting, and only serves as an attack on me...


So the douche responses, To you, Did I convey a unwillingness to explain and answer, any question from Alexb???? Since every answer was already forthcoming.

And If that wasn't the case.......... I sorry Alexb.

So let me reiterate.. Alexb, Please If you don't understand a certain "Chemistry" question, Please ask here...Again.

Cheers

The Douche.

Last edited by VicktorVauhn (2009-07-30 21:31:11)

Jonaphatus wrote:

You're right about the inane/innate, damn spell-check doesn't pick up "meaning". But you did

Well English is not my first language.....

I wasn't trying to sound clever. Or maybe I was, can't be sure.

Can we just bury the hatchet, and leave it at that

Cheers

Jona