People end up drinking the same amount if they want to get drunk or buzzing or whatever. I don't see the point of Light Beer tbh. I'd rather just have Juice or something if I wasn't going to have regular alcoholic drinks
I think it's more to do with the low cal count
so people cant like the taste of beer more than they do juice? not everyone drinks beer to get drunk. thats what liquor is for. i couldnt tell you the last time i was drunk on beer alone, and i drink it every dayMekstizzle wrote:
People end up drinking the same amount if they want to get drunk or buzzing or whatever. I don't see the point of Light Beer tbh. I'd rather just have Juice or something if I wasn't going to have regular alcoholic drinks
POTUS got Budburnzz wrote:
on the table? Blue Moon, Red Stripe, and . . . Bud Light. can you match who drank wut?
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/21025/chat-pd.jpg
PROFFASTA got Red Stripe
COP got Blue Moon
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
seymorebutts443 wrote:
Light beer is for douchebag frat boys, its cheap and easy to down in large quantities at parties. kind of like ryan seacrests semen.
It's all about Natty Light.
I drink all kinds of beer. I actually prefer Sam Adams Light compared to most regular Sam Adams beers. Not sure how that makes you a pussy.

this beer is /win


http://www.straightdope.com/columns/rea … ng-it-downDear Straight Dope:
A co-worker and I are at odds about the manner in which light beer is made. He contends the brewery adds carbonated water to dilute the liquid just before bottling. My argument is that a different mash is used, one containing less carbohydrates. This is the reason for reduced calories and alcohol. Please give us the straight dope on how "lite" beer is brewed. Thanks!
— Ed Nowacki, Butler, PA
Oh, come on, I thought everybody knew how light beer was made. All you need is a bucket of regular beer, a thirsty horse, and an empty bucket.
Kidding aside, you're both right. "Watering down" and reducing carbohydrates in the mash are used to cut calories, alone or in combination. Some companies do indeed simply dilute their beer, which reduces the calories but also the taste and alcohol content. Others add the enzyme alpha amylase, which converts most of the dextrins (which are carbohydrates responsible for much of the beer''s aroma and flavor) to alcohol, allowing you to use a lower-carb mash and make a beer with less carbohydrates but the same amount of alcohol. Or you can add glucose in the place of some of the barley malt (glucose is more easily fully converted to alcohol than the malt), which also bumps up the alcohol content while letting you use less carbs.
Most light beers, however, are made from a process made possible in 1964 with the commercial introduction of amyloglucosidase. This enzyme makes all the dextrins fermentable, unlike alpha amylase, which only affects some. All the starch in a beer can then be converted to alcohol, producing a slightly more alcoholic beer (about 1% higher than standard beer). In addition, because there are no dextrins left, the alcohol is absorbed more rapidly into the bloodstream. Tasteless beer that gets you drunk pronto? Sounds like a frat boy's dream. However, not wanting their customers to get blindsided by an unexpectedly potent drink, and perhaps realizing they can produce the beer less expensively with the same intoxicating effect of regular beer, brewers generally add water to adjust the alcohol content to slightly below that of a regular beer. There you have it--a weak-flavored, low calorie (from the loss of dextrins and subsequent dilution) beer with the same "kick" as regular beer.
Those of us who actually like beer and are willing to imbibe a few extra calories to avoid beer that tastes like watered-down dregs might want to know who we have to curse for this insipid imitation of the real thing. The first true light beer was Gablinger's Diet Beer, produced by the Rheingold brewery in 1967. Dr. Joseph L. Owades came up with the light beer making process used. "When I got into the beer business, I used to ask people why they did not drink beer. The answer I got was twofold: One, 'I don't like the way beer tastes.' Two, 'I'm afraid it will make me fat.' It was a common belief then that drinking beer made you fat. People weren't jogging and everybody believed beer drinkers got a big, fat beer belly. Period. I couldn't do anything about the taste of beer, but I could do something about the calories," he says in retrospect.
Owades also gave the formula to a friend at Chicago's Meister Brau brewery, which produced Meister Brau Lite later that same year. Both Gablinger's and MB Lite flopped, however. Miller bought Meister Brau, tweaked the light beer formula, and produced the first commercially successful light beer in 1975, Miller Lite. Currently light beers account for about 38% of the total beer market share, with a 25% greater portion of female drinkers than regular beer. Even micro-brewers are getting into light beer production, afraid to miss such a lucrative market.
/lmgtfy
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Not really. I mean they are technically like a diet soda, but that isn't why so many people drink them.Nic wrote:
Funny is what it is.... Apparently its the solution to the obesity problem in America. Go have your Big Mac wrap and a nice lite beer.
It's mainly because its less filling, so easier to drink more with out feeling so full. I'd rather just drink less of a beer that actually has alcohol in it... but that is generally more expensive and party goers tend to be more in for quantity.