Battlefield 2:Urban Warfare should be the next booster after Armored

2006-04-06 18:29:15

#1

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|7094|Washington, DC

I admit I'd pay for an urban combat booster pack, with maybe 1 tank per each side, with lots of TOW emplacements. Battlefield 2:Urban Warfare

-Streets of Shanghai: Big battle between USMC and PLA in Shanghai, pretty skyscrapers and buildings, lots of nice urban combats, tight streets means vehicles cannot maneuver as easily, PRONE TO DESTRUCTION FROM SPEC OPS AND ANTI TANK

-Dubai Faceoff (or some cheesy name): Kinda like Streets but in Dubai (remember, it's developing quickly, so by 2007/2008 it will be a lot prettier), USMC vs. MEC

-District Assault: A battle in the District of Columbia (That's Washington, DC for those of you who are not on the bright side)... that would be awesome, seeing as I live in this lame place of a city called DC

Anyone else think this would be a good idea? $10? No problem, it would definetly be awesome. It would sell well amongst those seeking more infantry battle, and if the maps are designed well then it would be focused on infantry.

2006-04-06 18:39:24

#2

Chaos81: Member; +5|7152

I'd buy it.

2006-04-06 18:48:33

#3

greedyj: Member; +0|7126

Yessssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss!

2006-04-06 19:05:44

#4

rustynutz: I am British!; +124|7146|England and damn proud

Fuck yea i would buy that!

2006-04-06 19:06:22

#5

Citizen One: 한국 공주; +338|7113|South Korea.

ExecutionerStyle wrote:
-Streets of Shanghai: Big battle between USMC and PLA in Shanghai, pretty skyscrapers and buildings, lots of nice urban combats, tight streets means vehicles cannot maneuver as easily, PRONE TO DESTRUCTION FROM SPEC OPS AND ANTI TANK

A chinese urban map? I vote yes, I would pay 10 dollars just for that alone.

2006-04-06 19:06:32

#6

destruktion_6143: Was ist Loos?; +154|7090|Canada

i wonder why EA doesnt have enuf common sense to understand we LOVE city maps

2006-04-06 19:07:02

#7

Spearhead: Gulf coast redneck hippy; +731|7153|Tampa Bay Florida

me 4

2006-04-06 19:14:03

#8

PRiMACORD: Member; +190|7089|Home of the Escalade Herds

Dubai? lol

Have you seen Dubai? Not exactly a warzone unless your idea of a warzone is paradise

2006-04-06 19:24:30

#9

Hurricane: Banned; +1,153|7094|Washington, DC

PRiMACORD wrote:
Dubai? lol

Have you seen Dubai? Not exactly a warzone unless your idea of a warzone is paradise

Paradise gone bad. Shanghai is a pretty city too, and DC, well, come on a battle in the capital of the USA is pretty fun.

2006-04-06 19:28:47

#10

Hiei987: Member; +20|7155

There are enough city maps already, entire SF was released for urban combat. Either way, someone won't be happy if the booster pack is released based on single type of battle. 4 Urban and 4 Armor/Jet maps would be the best, but as EA proved they don't really respond to what the players want and rather recieve lots of complaints...

2006-04-06 19:29:10

#11

Thumper04: "So there I was..."; +7|7092|Floriduh

hells yes.

Of course, they'll get smart and release that booster right after they release 2142, and realize what a colossal facking mistake 2142 is bound to be.

2006-04-06 19:33:00

#12

DeadboyUSMC: Member; +65|7163|NCFSU2

Sounds cool, but I've got a problem with any invading army being in the capitol of the US. Just isn't going to happen!

2006-04-06 19:35:12

#13

iceman785: Member; +93|7136|Alaska, mother fucker.

if you dont buy that your a fool, BUY IT!!!! HELL YA!!!!

2006-04-06 19:46:35

#14

Hiei987: Member; +20|7155

DeadboyUSMC wrote:
Sounds cool, but I've got a problem with any invading army being in the capitol of the US. Just isn't going to happen!

They'll say the Chinese sent their entire Air Force of 100000 planes to US, half got shot down, the other half bailed out over DC like idiots.

2006-04-06 19:49:02

#15

joemah: Member; +6|7205

I would buy it if it had more than 3 maps. EA is rippiin gpeople off by only relasing 3 maps and chargin 10 bucks. I would pay 10 buck for minimum 5 maps, and a whoel set of new unlocks.

2006-04-06 19:50:49

#16

Viper007Bond: Moderator Emeritus; +236|7269|Portland, OR, USA

How is this different from SF? If you want infantry play, go play that.

https://bf3s.com/sigs/044900892044e7fc95e599e832a086ae9bcd7efb.png

2006-04-06 20:01:48

#17

luckybaer: Member; +10|7238| Going Feral

Yeah, but SF blew because the maps were too tough for some folks to run. Also, the maps were out of the regular rotation. I think if they made SF so it could be run like the booster packs, the maps would be even more popular. As it is, Ghost Town and Warlord are very, very popular.

2006-04-06 20:05:02

#18

Viper007Bond: Moderator Emeritus; +236|7269|Portland, OR, USA

Well get a non-shitty PC then. SF runs just fine for me.

I do agree about the normal rotation though, however no grappling hooks and such in reg BF2.

2006-04-06 20:11:02

#19

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7184|California

Citizen One wrote:
ExecutionerStyle wrote:
-Streets of Shanghai: Big battle between USMC and PLA in Shanghai, pretty skyscrapers and buildings, lots of nice urban combats, tight streets means vehicles cannot maneuver as easily, PRONE TO DESTRUCTION FROM SPEC OPS AND ANTI TANK
A chinese urban map? I vote yes, I would pay 10 dollars just for that alone.

because you hate china?

id buy it definitely. sniping from the balconies

2006-04-06 20:34:19

#20

Citizen One: 한국 공주; +338|7113|South Korea.

No my grandma is from China lol. I mean it would be awesome to play as china in a urban way, the reason no one plays as china is because all there maps are big huge open areas that take like 5 minutes too meet the enemy.

2006-04-06 20:35:11

#21

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|7184|California

Citizen One wrote:
No my grandma is from China lol. I mean it would be awesome to play as china in a urban way, the reason no one plays as china is because all there maps are big huge open areas that take like 5 minutes too meet the enemy.

hmmn... touche.

i want to play 3 Gourges Dam as a map, hot shit that would be nuts

2006-04-06 20:39:11

#22

-]Eucalyptus[-: I'm a MOO MOO STARRR!!1; +17|7207|Switzerland (Im not swiss tho)

ExecutionerStyle wrote:
-District Assault: A battle in the District of Columbia (That's Washington, DC for those of you who are not on the bright side)... that would be awesome, seeing as I live in this lame place of a city called DC

.... what? lame place of a city? noooooooooooooooooooooooooo i am going to be moving there in AUGUST wtf. it better be a good city. coz thats where im gonna spend 4 years in college, at george washington university

DeadboyUSMC wrote:
Sounds cool, but I've got a problem with any invading army being in the capitol of the US. Just isn't going to happen!

see a previous post i've made as a response to armored fury's mec invasion of america:

i like the idea of defending America but there is no way the MEC could possibly ever land its forces on the USA.

It is impossible. It is illogical. BUT, it is a game

The MEC does not have the amphibious capability to even consider doing so. Any defeats USA may suffer in forward deployment theaters does not mean the same will happen with America on the defense. America on the defense will ultimately defeat any force, provided air superiority is maintained (as it is and always will be) and the oceans that line both coasts are protecting America. The only realistic thing that is possible is the Alaskan landing of Chinese forces. The Chinese would probably have to walk all over the canadians to get to the USA (im sure the canadians would let them through) but they'd suffer numerous air attacks, all the while not having any air superority of their own (they have no carriers).

There's also the factor of the nuclear option. If mainland USA were to be invaded, and although the nuclear option would be the last measure, be assured that it WILL be used if the USA is close to defeat.

If America goes down, the world goes with it.

In that respect, you cannot defeat America and America is here to stay.

China would be better off defending it's sphere of influence (Asia) and dominating through economic influence.

this was from a while back. it pissed off a lot of people

2006-04-06 20:52:57

#23

Vinny: Member; +7|7239| The Dirtty Dirtty

-]Eucalyptus[- wrote:
**EDITED cuz of length***
this was from a while back. it pissed off a lot of people

Very nicely said buddy and Very intellegent if i do say so myself.

But since they did add the Russians they could have the Russians attack the US since there has always been a DEEP down Rivalry of the Super Powers.

But instead of DC how bout Fort Nox where all the Gold is. So they would have to fight to have all the gold or something.

And i would LOVE this Booster Pack i mean come on nuttin but Man to Man fighting.

Good Post.

Last edited by Vinny (2006-04-06 20:53:27)

2006-04-07 00:22:12

#24

Chowley: Member; +1|7150|Ireland

would be amazing if they did it, its one id definately buy though

2006-04-07 05:48:53

#25

kilroy0097: Kilroy Is Here!; +81|7307|Bryan/College Station, TX

Here is a conflict that would errupt into all out controversy.

MEC vs. Israel in Jerusalem.

This is conflict that WILL happen eventually in the future.

"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

BF2S Forums Battlefield 2:Urban Warfare should be the next booster after Armored

ExecutionerStyle wrote:

PRiMACORD wrote:

DeadboyUSMC wrote:

Citizen One wrote:

ExecutionerStyle wrote:

Citizen One wrote:

ExecutionerStyle wrote:

DeadboyUSMC wrote:

-]Eucalyptus[- wrote:

Board footer