agree.kilroy0097 wrote:
Here is a conflict that would errupt into all out controversy.
MEC vs. Israel in Jerusalem.
This is conflict that WILL happen eventually in the future.
gamers think better than the developers lol
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Battlefield 2:Urban Warfare should be the next booster after Armored
gamers think better than the developers lol
Infantry friendly maps, not necessarily urban. If you put a lot of tanks and APCs and jets in an urban setting it's not infantry centred combat anymore. A jungle/forest map can offer good infantry battles if the vehicles are few enough to not dominate the battlefield.
As long as there is somewhere for me to hide away from the action & picnic I dont mind
Yes sir. Fire team rushes FTW!voltage wrote:
Infantry friendly maps, not necessarily urban. If you put a lot of tanks and APCs and jets in an urban setting it's not infantry centred combat anymore. A jungle/forest map can offer good infantry battles if the vehicles are few enough to not dominate the battlefield.
It's not that easy to just get a non-shitty PC, you have to to save up money from your minimum wage job if you're under 20 years olds.Viper007Bond wrote:
Well get a non-shitty PC then. SF runs just fine for me.
I do agree about the normal rotation though, however no grappling hooks and such in reg BF2.
I 'gree with One... Count me in, you would have to call it Urban Forces or summat though, AF BF SF EF...Citizen One wrote:
A chinese urban map? I vote yes, I would pay 10 dollars just for that alone.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
I HOPE YOU RELAISE THAT EA LOST ITS MIND 3 years ago. now dice have to do all the work and ea just stick a label on the game......... but yes i love city maps but you cna be a brigadier general with out planes and suchdestruktion_6143 wrote:
i wonder why EA doesnt have enuf common sense to understand we LOVE city maps
I'd hit it!
Just take the MEC Special Forces and say it's a terrorist thing...if I remember correctly there has been some incident on U.S. soil,right??DeadboyUSMC wrote:
Sounds cool, but I've got a problem with any invading army being in the capitol of the US. Just isn't going to happen!
Not really an invasion now was it?Mj.Blindfisch wrote:
Just take the MEC Special Forces and say it's a terrorist thing...if I remember correctly there has been some incident on U.S. soil,right??DeadboyUSMC wrote:
Sounds cool, but I've got a problem with any invading army being in the capitol of the US. Just isn't going to happen!
Seriously fuck you people and your whining about no city maps. WHY DO YOU THINK KARKAND IS THE NUMBER ONE MAP?
People wanty action and they dont wanna have to find it. Karkand and Warlord provide instant action. So saying to "stick to SF" makes you look like a fucking retard. Just because you people need vehicles for crutches doesnt mean there isnt a market for 100% grunt action.
It absolutely fucking baffles me how people can be against shit like this. If you dont want urban maps DONT PLAY THEM. Useless vehicle whores.
People wanty action and they dont wanna have to find it. Karkand and Warlord provide instant action. So saying to "stick to SF" makes you look like a fucking retard. Just because you people need vehicles for crutches doesnt mean there isnt a market for 100% grunt action.
It absolutely fucking baffles me how people can be against shit like this. If you dont want urban maps DONT PLAY THEM. Useless vehicle whores.
You forgot the useless flight simmer airplane-nade whores.Bigwrm wrote:
Seriously fuck you people and your whining about no city maps. WHY DO YOU THINK KARKAND IS THE NUMBER ONE MAP?
People wanty action and they dont wanna have to find it. Karkand and Warlord provide instant action. So saying to "stick to SF" makes you look like a fucking retard. Just because you people need vehicles for crutches doesnt mean there isnt a market for 100% grunt action.
It absolutely fucking baffles me how people can be against shit like this. If you dont want urban maps DONT PLAY THEM. Useless vehicle whores.
No,but they could have landed in Central Park instead and wreak some havoc there with their ceramic knives,I guess....usmarine2005 wrote:
Not really an invasion now was it?Mj.Blindfisch wrote:
Just take the MEC Special Forces and say it's a terrorist thing...if I remember correctly there has been some incident on U.S. soil,right??DeadboyUSMC wrote:
Sounds cool, but I've got a problem with any invading army being in the capitol of the US. Just isn't going to happen!
Sure,I know,no proud American would think that any army could invade the U.S.,but just let's pretend,you know,like in the movie Red Dawn...
Red Dawn map FTW! WOLVERINES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Mj.Blindfisch wrote:
No,but they could have landed in Central Park instead and wreak some havoc there with their ceramic knives,I guess....usmarine2005 wrote:
Not really an invasion now was it?Mj.Blindfisch wrote:
Just take the MEC Special Forces and say it's a terrorist thing...if I remember correctly there has been some incident on U.S. soil,right??
Sure,I know,no proud American would think that any army could invade the U.S.,but just let's pretend,you know,like in the movie Red Dawn...
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2006-04-07 07:25:52)
i will buy it !!!!
I'd definately be down for some more urban combat maps. However, I'd like to see a scenario where a team is going back into an area to secure it. Yeah, it's already there, but I want more rubble, more destroyed buildings(with shadowy corner pockets for snipers, and AT). Give it that really "hellish" feel to it. Just my .02
Ide like a nice map of a skyscraper or maybe an oil rig somewhere with lots of interior close quarter combat room to room fighting. 0 gun emplacements, 0 armor, 0 flying, and 0 uncappable bases. You just duke it out until one side is dead. Would be nice to have assault with grapling hooks where you could climb up the side of the building from balconies. Maybe have a flag every other floor (depending on the size of the floorplan). 2-3 Stairwells and 1-2 elevators so that you dont end up with too many choke points for people to just nade/c4/claymore whore.
Yes! Great idea! Wait, what was Special Forces? .......................
RETARD!!!VeNg3nCe^ wrote:
Yes! Great idea! Wait, what was Special Forces? .......................
SF was an nice attempt at Infantry combat. But fell short. At least there are no jets. Whats the matter? Some new maps with no vehicles just burns your ass?
Ill save you the effort and tell myself to go play CounterStike.
DROOL that girl on your sig is hot.....Citizen One wrote:
No my grandma is from China lol. I mean it would be awesome to play as china in a urban way, the reason no one plays as china is because all there maps are big huge open areas that take like 5 minutes too meet the enemy.
Edit: back on topic that would be a great idea. Why does EA only listen to the whiners??
Last edited by Masta_Daco (2006-04-07 08:42:00)
They really should, I would buy it. I actually have 2 summer houses in Shanghai. One thats like a block away from the stadium, and another in the suburbs.
In Shanghai, there are a LOT of alleyways, that probably are only big enough for a hummer, (however a DPV might be better to use in the alleywa) and are impossible to move a vehicle
The alleyways are a lot like the alleyways from Somilia in the movie BlackHawkDown, except its much cleaner, but it would definitely be hard, because the alleyways have gardens & trees.
The buildings are at least 5 stories high, up to skyscrapers, and there are a lot of shopping malls & construction.
Tanks can create problems, because it depends on which district of Shanghai, however the tanks would be limited, because they could only travel on the abandoned freeways & main roads, and could get easily destroyed because there are so many windows, and alleyways that lead to the main road.
I would probably have main bases at the Stadium, and an airport for the teams. The freeways I think will circle around the map, with main roads in the center, because thats how it is in real life, add a lot of buildings in the middle, and a canal somewhere in the middle too.
If they ever made a Shanghai map, IMO I think it might be a Sharqi type map, I dont see how much infantry you could use, cause you could utilize attack choppers, and APC's. Unless the map was all based on taking CP's through alleyways and urban warface,
BTW, I think its plausible to create a MEC landing on the US East Coast, cant they use a huge civilian shipping container fright ship, and land on a beach with RIB's on the east coast by night fall?
In Shanghai, there are a LOT of alleyways, that probably are only big enough for a hummer, (however a DPV might be better to use in the alleywa) and are impossible to move a vehicle
The alleyways are a lot like the alleyways from Somilia in the movie BlackHawkDown, except its much cleaner, but it would definitely be hard, because the alleyways have gardens & trees.
The buildings are at least 5 stories high, up to skyscrapers, and there are a lot of shopping malls & construction.
Tanks can create problems, because it depends on which district of Shanghai, however the tanks would be limited, because they could only travel on the abandoned freeways & main roads, and could get easily destroyed because there are so many windows, and alleyways that lead to the main road.
I would probably have main bases at the Stadium, and an airport for the teams. The freeways I think will circle around the map, with main roads in the center, because thats how it is in real life, add a lot of buildings in the middle, and a canal somewhere in the middle too.
If they ever made a Shanghai map, IMO I think it might be a Sharqi type map, I dont see how much infantry you could use, cause you could utilize attack choppers, and APC's. Unless the map was all based on taking CP's through alleyways and urban warface,
BTW, I think its plausible to create a MEC landing on the US East Coast, cant they use a huge civilian shipping container fright ship, and land on a beach with RIB's on the east coast by night fall?
Last edited by Ogopogo15 (2006-04-07 09:35:45)
Desert Paradise that is. But damn, an example of what happens when you practically eliminate poverty. One of the lowest crime rate cities I believe.PRiMACORD wrote:
Dubai? lol
Have you seen Dubai? Not exactly a warzone unless your idea of a warzone is paradise
But doesn't Ghost Town qualify as a ruined Dubai map?
Go to any major Southern California university. They are everywhere here... But in Amsterdam...Masta_Daco wrote:
DROOL that girl on your sig is hot.....
There will be no more booster packs after the next one, if 2142 Lauches on time, why would the extend the life of this game while trying to sell us a new $50.00 game. Also with EA having all but one office working on 2142 you are sure to see a rushed and unfinished 1.3 patch for BF2.Would you really wat to see a ruched and unfinished Booster too, oh wait Euro Force comes to mind............
Last edited by Neoburn_1035 (2006-04-07 13:29:33)
it would be great, as said before, I don't understand EA, there by far most popualr maps are all more infantry based fighting, city maps and stuff, the most hated maps are the very large open ones only usefull with vehicles, they bring us a booster pack with ........ large open maps, 10 tanks each side, some choppers and jets , and now we wait for armored fury, wich is the true vehicle based booster pack, wonder what this will be , 10 tanks for each person, 5 jets a person, ten choppers, ....
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Battlefield 2:Urban Warfare should be the next booster after Armored