One more and you're out UziqueUzique wrote:
typical because im calling you a dumbass.
Let's not. To entertain your idea that that one book is my one and only, I'm interested in why you're comparing Richard Dawkin's books with shit. Sure renaming atheists is ridiculous, and he's done other similarly dumb things before, but it doesn't have anything to do with the reasoning put forward in his books.
Train ticket - £4
Getting your mate so monumentally fucked he can't keep his head up, and throwing him in a taxi home - £25
Getting hammered and getting your mate pulled over by the police for waving at a taxi driver - £20
Waking up, still drunk, completely disorientated in a random Ford Fiesta, in a pink sleeping bag, with a tenner in your wallet - Priceless
Getting your mate so monumentally fucked he can't keep his head up, and throwing him in a taxi home - £25
Getting hammered and getting your mate pulled over by the police for waving at a taxi driver - £20
Waking up, still drunk, completely disorientated in a random Ford Fiesta, in a pink sleeping bag, with a tenner in your wallet - Priceless
Liq for adminliquidat0r wrote:
Get this DAST shit out of EE Chat. tbh
DAST Chat - Septemberliquidat0r wrote:
Get this DAST shit out of EE Chat. tbh
lez doit
ive already said the arguments in his books are often reductionist and just as absurd as any religious belief he attacks.
you comment on my smart-wording and intellectual wool-pulling, yet you're easily led by dawkin's pen, it seems.
some of his arguments are so weak and pathetic that you wonder how his crap even gets published. i love his books on biology- they bridge the gap between high-science and common understandability, and offer fascinating reads - but his attempts at 'polemical' or controversial atheist bandwagon-driving are terribly weak in areas. also, dawkins is ideologically opposed to organized religion. most of his criticisms are aimed at the ridiculousness and futility of organized religions and their beliefs, habits and conflicts. he doesn't really say much philosophically or intellectually about the spiritual and transcendent idea of a 'god'. he puts his reasoning and trust in rationality, empiricism, science and proof... which is fair. but even the greatest of scientists throughout history have had reserved agnosticism or spiritualist tendencies. dawkins is a militant leader of his own self-empowering church, full of easily-led people that are satisfied with receiving their spiritual outlook from one WHS Smith paperback. i prefer to not be so damned simple.
oh and get bent with the D&ST chat crap. like staring at old recycled internet .jpegs/.gifs is any more exciting and chat-worthy.
you comment on my smart-wording and intellectual wool-pulling, yet you're easily led by dawkin's pen, it seems.
some of his arguments are so weak and pathetic that you wonder how his crap even gets published. i love his books on biology- they bridge the gap between high-science and common understandability, and offer fascinating reads - but his attempts at 'polemical' or controversial atheist bandwagon-driving are terribly weak in areas. also, dawkins is ideologically opposed to organized religion. most of his criticisms are aimed at the ridiculousness and futility of organized religions and their beliefs, habits and conflicts. he doesn't really say much philosophically or intellectually about the spiritual and transcendent idea of a 'god'. he puts his reasoning and trust in rationality, empiricism, science and proof... which is fair. but even the greatest of scientists throughout history have had reserved agnosticism or spiritualist tendencies. dawkins is a militant leader of his own self-empowering church, full of easily-led people that are satisfied with receiving their spiritual outlook from one WHS Smith paperback. i prefer to not be so damned simple.
oh and get bent with the D&ST chat crap. like staring at old recycled internet .jpegs/.gifs is any more exciting and chat-worthy.
Last edited by Uzique (2009-09-03 04:30:06)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Hey guys hows it going?
srs bzns.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
easy and breezy my friend
yeah im sorry that anything over a one-line recycled internet meme strikes you as intimidatingly or uninterestingly 'serious'.
it must really suck to be you. entertained by drivel.
it must really suck to be you. entertained by drivel.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Apology accepted.
A humble lad this Uzique.
A humble lad this Uzique.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
that's it, disqualifiedUzique wrote:
oh and get bent with the D&ST chat crap.
Reductionist arguments are bad? Just as absurd? You're going to have to come up with an example here
A large part of the god delusion is dedicated to defining god itself disregarding religions, and then attempting to disprove it as far as he can. If I remember correctly, organized religion is only a small part of the book.
Nothing's stopping you guys from posting 'funny' pictures and copy-pasted posts in the meantime, fyi
A large part of the god delusion is dedicated to defining god itself disregarding religions, and then attempting to disprove it as far as he can. If I remember correctly, organized religion is only a small part of the book.
Nothing's stopping you guys from posting 'funny' pictures and copy-pasted posts in the meantime, fyi
Last edited by Lucien (2009-09-03 04:39:39)
stop debating in the spam thread!
I used to play with these in my bathtub all the time when I was kid
fight fight fight!
You know i never had one of those
Working in New Hampshire on a summer camp, got back last week, it was awesome, even if New Hampshire was full of rednecks.ph1shman420 wrote:
damn where the fuck u beenThe Sheriff wrote:
Post what you got banned for.
:>
iputonmyrobeandwizardhat.Sup wrote:
I used to play with these in my bathtub all the time when I was kid
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e … ow_res.jpg
I'm dying
Wait until beauty pageant contest is overCammRobb wrote:
I'm dying
When? Did you do an internet test? Or is it something the doctor said? Or perhaps a metaphore for E.g. a bad hangover or flu?
If alternative no.1: We all die sometime, it's lifes great reward.
If alternative no.2: Wtf? NO!
If alternative no.3: I feel ya man.
If alternative no.1: We all die sometime, it's lifes great reward.
If alternative no.2: Wtf? NO!
If alternative no.3: I feel ya man.
I need around tree fiddy.
I'll try, might not start the next round today..Sup wrote:
Wait until beauty pageant contest is overCammRobb wrote:
I'm dying
Number 3, but I'm glad you'd if it was number 2DonFck wrote:
When? Did you do an internet test? Or is it something the doctor said? Or perhaps a metaphore for E.g. a bad hangover or flu?
If alternative no.1: We all die sometime, it's lifes great reward.
If alternative no.2: Wtf? NO!
If alternative no.3: I feel ya man.
Last edited by CammRobb (2009-09-03 04:48:11)
zomg, my parents are talking about getting a swimming pool