.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6873|The Twilight Zone

RAIMIUS wrote:

Yeah, the aircraft was not getting enough lift for standard flight, it appears.
If you look, the nose is pointed above the horizon, but the aircraft is still descending quickly.  I'm guessing(!) that they were bordering on a stall, and had some engine problems. 

Yeah, some sources are saying they ingested at least one bird.  That is at least 50% of their thrust gone, and if both engines ingested birds, a total loss of engine power.  Losing power at low altitude doesn't give one much time to recover, especially when they tried to steer away from a village.  I'm not sure why they were unable to eject.  It is possible that they were not in a good position to eject, or that they simply flew the aircraft for too long (attempting to avoid ground casualties).
How can you cope with this "bird" problem? Can it happen to other jets too?
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png
RAIMIUS
You with the face!
+244|7134|US
It can easily happen to other jets.  That's what happened the US Airways flight that crashed in the Hudson River.
There are a few ways to cope with the chances of birdstrikes.  The most common is keep birds away from airports.  A lot of airports will simply hunt down or scare away any birds living in the area.
tahadar
Sniper!!
+183|7158|Pakistan/England
from an engineering point of view, the only thing that can be done to reduce damage from birdstrikes is to design tougher, more impact-resistant components in the engine. but at the end of the day, a birdstrike is such a rare event that significantly increasing the strength of each compressor/turbine blade and the combustor components is just not worth the extra weight and cost. Not to say that the birdstrike factor is ignored in engine design, im just saying that more could be done but just isnt.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard