HaiBai
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
+304|5903|Bolingbrook, Illinois

VicktorVauhn wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Slarty wrote:


Indeed. True AI would be when the "hand" is able to catch an object that is thrown at it at a random time and trajectory. Then I'll be very scared.
actually no. AI means it can make decisions on its own, without any previous programming telling it what to do. (self-learning program). Catching a random throw is just a lot physics calculations done to the sensor data in real time (like how fast the object is thrown, how far it is, predictions where it will be in next 0.1s etc.

When a robot decides it doesn't want to take part in such test and rolls out of the door and goes buy some batteries for itself, THATS when I am scared.
Actually yes, just like he said, the robot decides when it wants to throw it and what it wants to throw it at.... that would be AI, because as you said it would be making decisions on its own.
Not really..  It's just recording information then performing actions based on the information.  The actions that it makes are defined by the programmer.  The program doesn't make its own decisions, it does whatever the coding tells it to do.
Miggle
FUCK UBISOFT
+1,411|7161|FUCK UBISOFT

HaiBai wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:


actually no. AI means it can make decisions on its own, without any previous programming telling it what to do. (self-learning program). Catching a random throw is just a lot physics calculations done to the sensor data in real time (like how fast the object is thrown, how far it is, predictions where it will be in next 0.1s etc.

When a robot decides it doesn't want to take part in such test and rolls out of the door and goes buy some batteries for itself, THATS when I am scared.
Actually yes, just like he said, the robot decides when it wants to throw it and what it wants to throw it at.... that would be AI, because as you said it would be making decisions on its own.
Not really..  It's just recording information then performing actions based on the information.  The actions that it makes are defined by the programmer.  The program doesn't make its own decisions, it does whatever the coding tells it to do.
what if the coding tells it to make its own decisions?
https://i.imgur.com/86fodNE.png
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|6834|Finland

HaiBai wrote:

VicktorVauhn wrote:

GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:


actually no. AI means it can make decisions on its own, without any previous programming telling it what to do. (self-learning program). Catching a random throw is just a lot physics calculations done to the sensor data in real time (like how fast the object is thrown, how far it is, predictions where it will be in next 0.1s etc.

When a robot decides it doesn't want to take part in such test and rolls out of the door and goes buy some batteries for itself, THATS when I am scared.
Actually yes, just like he said, the robot decides when it wants to throw it and what it wants to throw it at.... that would be AI, because as you said it would be making decisions on its own.
Not really..  It's just recording information then performing actions based on the information.  The actions that it makes are defined by the programmer.  The program doesn't make its own decisions, it does whatever the coding tells it to do.
I don't quite follow you, where did I say its AI in this case? I said the exactly opposite.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard