BF2S Forums Children and Propaganda

rammunition wrote:

ATG wrote:

rammunition wrote:

Terrorist dictator??

LOL, The man is DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED. Just because he isn't someone who bows down and faces west 5 times a day doesn't make him a terrorist.

If you want to know real terrorists, compare Iran and the U.S. The former hasn't attacked anyone in aggression for centuries, whilst the latter hasn't stopped spilling blood since the end of WW2 in the name of "American freedom".

No doubt there is a upbringing factor to this aggression by the latter.

To quote the late Mr. Saffire;
“hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history.”


That's what camp you are in.

You could even attempt to make a good case for why a world wide Islamic system, but it is easier to just play the extreme.

Do you notice that m3thod is popular on this website and you are, not so much?

You both come from similar points of view, but the difference is the delivery.
m3th is a guy you feel like you could sit down and have a beer with and discuss things.
You kind of come across like this;



http://farm1.static.flickr.com/208/4408 … ac.jpg?v=0



But hey, it's a free internet. Do what ye like.

seems i touched a raw nerve, thus the reason you are comparing other users to my style. Seems i win the argument as you are avoiding and have changed the subject.

Lai wrote:

Fuck you.

reported, your intelligence levels have been shown.

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Please KEN, can I please post a facepalm-swastika right here?

It's necessary and proper.

instead of avoiding the points, use any of your intelligence to counter my point. its called debate for a reason.

some people need to grow up.

You're not producing a point to counter, you're stating outright that American's are terrorists because they've been involved with recent wars. Since they are the only remaining superpower and a big friggin world influence, of course they're going to be involved in just about any major conflict. What about the others in these conflicts? The UK, the Netherlands, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Norway, Poland, they've all been there doing the same job as the US.

You're comparing the suicide and martyr encouraging Farfour to a Jesus Camp, only one of which will have produced people who detonate themselves in public places, and its not JC. America has its share of whackjobs, everywhere does, but you cannot in any shape or form compare the kind of propaganda used by Islamic terrorists groups with those in America.

And if Achmadinnerjacket got in fairly then I'm a black man.

rammunition wrote:

Lai wrote:

Fuck you.

reported, your intelligence levels have been shown.

My intelligence levels? I hoped further elaboration would not have been necessary.

rammunition wrote:

LOL, The man is DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED. Just because he isn't someone who bows down and faces west 5 times a day doesn't make him a terrorist.

If you want to know real terrorists, compare Iran and the U.S. The former hasn't attacked anyone in aggression for centuries, whilst the latter hasn't stopped spilling blood since the end of WW2 in the name of "American freedom".

No doubt there is a upbringing factor to this aggression by the latter.

Who needs to attack anyone when you can do this to your own?



To be DEMOCRATICALLY ELECTED, who needs to count votes, when your votes are this anonymous?



I find your endorsement of the Ahmadinejad office revolting, and that has nothing to do with Islam.

noobs... go watch Occupation 101. Great movie about Palestinian Israeli conflict and how big US role is. More than you think!

Lai wrote:

Beduin wrote:

noobs... go watch Occupation 101. Great movie about Palestinian Israeli conflict and how big US role is. More than you think!

Sure, but what has that got to do with this?

state backed terror?

Lai wrote:

Would you name it such? Evidently if you label Israel's policy as terrorist it will always be state backed in any case at Israel is a state

If Israel dose not change its policy towards Palestinians, it is terrorism.
It is not the state, it is the policy.

Lai wrote:

Beduin wrote:

Lai wrote:

Would you name it such? Evidently if you label Israel's policy as terrorist it will always be state backed in any case at Israel is a state

If Israel dose not change its policy towards Palestinians, it is terrorism.
It is not the state, it is the policy.

Well I'm not starting up the Palestinian debate again, but my point is that if you look at it that way, it is state backed in any case.

I have hopes for Israel

edit: And the Palestinians oc

Last edited by Beduin (2009-09-28 03:15:08)