gtfo trollChou wrote:
No, would that be realistic?M.O.A.B wrote:
I've been wondering, can you melee with the rifles?
"Raise the flag high! Let the degenerates know who comes to claim their lives this day!"
gtfo trollChou wrote:
No, would that be realistic?M.O.A.B wrote:
I've been wondering, can you melee with the rifles?
I like the game, it's just nothing they promised. CM had OFPDR under development for 6 years and been lying for the last year through false advertising. that's my point, many people bought the game as they represented and it was a trap.M.O.A.B wrote:
You know if you don't like the game there is an option to not play or bitch about it
I lol at the complaint that it was the fault of consoles. As I recall, OFP didn't have melee, ArmA didn't have melee, ArmA 2 didn't have melee and yet they were all PC games. Funny too, cos KZ2 has melee.Chou wrote:
I like the game, it's just nothing they promised. CM had OFPDR under development for 6 years and been lying for the last year through false advertising. that's my point, many people bought the game as they represented and it was a trap.M.O.A.B wrote:
You know if you don't like the game there is an option to not play or bitch about it
Some people are easily amused with lies and deception. Some are not.
So the answer to your melee question was No.
Would melee be realism? Ofcourse it would but it's not included, probably because that was the last detail that would've crashed the capacity of a console.
you might like it.SEREMAKER wrote:
is this game worth it
it would be realistic so would sticking a bayonet on your rifle and stabbing a guy up. although the last bayonet charge was in the FalklandsBlade4509 wrote:
gtfo trollChou wrote:
No, would that be realistic?M.O.A.B wrote:
I've been wondering, can you melee with the rifles?
noSEREMAKER wrote:
is it like BF2 with massive areas
I belive that there was a bayonet charge in Iraq. I could be wrong but I remember seeing it posted somewhere.GR34 wrote:
it would be realistic so would sticking a bayonet on your rifle and stabbing a guy up. although the last bayonet charge was in the FalklandsBlade4509 wrote:
gtfo trollChou wrote:
No, would that be realistic?
BF2 style movement but other than that, it's a milsim.SEREMAKER wrote:
is it like BF2 with massive areas
BF2 maps to an exponential level ... the one map supposedly would take over 9 hrs to walk across.SEREMAKER wrote:
then whats it like then
So it's basically Project Reality sized?Stingray24 wrote:
BF2 maps to an exponential level ... the one map supposedly would take over 9 hrs to walk across.SEREMAKER wrote:
then whats it like then
2:20 in he gives an idea of the size ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSd3HdM0 … re=related
nope try ARMA sized. as in you play the whole island @ onceWar Man wrote:
So it's basically Project Reality sized?Stingray24 wrote:
BF2 maps to an exponential level ... the one map supposedly would take over 9 hrs to walk across.SEREMAKER wrote:
then whats it like then
2:20 in he gives an idea of the size ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSd3HdM0 … re=related
except you don'tGR34 wrote:
nope try ARMA sized. as in you play the whole island @ onceWar Man wrote:
So it's basically Project Reality sized?Stingray24 wrote:
BF2 maps to an exponential level ... the one map supposedly would take over 9 hrs to walk across.
2:20 in he gives an idea of the size ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wSd3HdM0 … re=related
PC version?Miggle wrote:
except you don'tGR34 wrote:
nope try ARMA sized. as in you play the whole island @ onceWar Man wrote:
So it's basically Project Reality sized?