iPod, but I'm an apple bitch. Heh, I discovered earlier this week how to use the remote app to actually control iTunes. pretty tbh
Neither, get a proper portable music player.Runs_with_sciss0rs wrote:
iPod touch or Zune HD?
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Woot. The instructions fiiinalllllyyyy came. Tonight I shall roll the OpAmp in my DAC Will report back
i thought the Walkman was dead.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Neither, get a proper portable music player.

having a hard time finding cassettes though, Freezer.
Dude! Fucking mixtapes own! I still have a ton of cassette tapes. You can still buy them at electronic stores. I mainly make them out of necessity (don't wanna bother with the stupid tape converter and screwing around with an mp3 player), and it's fun, too. Sort of like DJ'ing in a way.
Eloquent in it's brevi- wait, no.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Neither, get a proper portable music player.Runs_with_sciss0rs wrote:
iPod touch or Zune HD?
I assume the first thing you would have suggested is the Cowon D2+.
Scissors:
Small, flash, SD slot, touch screen, superb audio quality, 52 hour battery life. The only downside is an unrefined UI; the D2+ is supposed to fix that but I haven't had experience on it. The first UI is some minor annoyances, but I've never had a real problem with it.
Cowon D2+ = Cowon D2 with another colour. I run D2+ firmware on my D2.Defiance wrote:
Eloquent in it's brevi- wait, no.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Neither, get a proper portable music player.Runs_with_sciss0rs wrote:
iPod touch or Zune HD?
I assume the first thing you would have suggested is the Cowon D2+.
Scissors:
Small, flash, SD slot, touch screen, superb audio quality, 52 hour battery life. The only downside is an unrefined UI; the D2+ is supposed to fix that but I haven't had experience on it. The first UI is some minor annoyances, but I've never had a real problem with it.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
I installed the OpAmp. Dual OPA627's to replace a single OPA2604.
HOLY.
FUCKING.
Pics or it didn't happen?





My ears just came.
btw, here is the album on facebook - http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=1 … =508019615 - if you add me, at least tell me your BF2s name
HOLY.
FUCKING.
Pics or it didn't happen?





My ears just came.
btw, here is the album on facebook - http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=1 … =508019615 - if you add me, at least tell me your BF2s name
I've read of it's possibility, but never bothered to try it. Do you think it's a good improvement over the original firmware?Freezer7Pro wrote:
Cowon D2+ = Cowon D2 with another colour. I run D2+ firmware on my D2.Defiance wrote:
Eloquent in it's brevi- wait, no.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Neither, get a proper portable music player.
I assume the first thing you would have suggested is the Cowon D2+.
Scissors:
Small, flash, SD slot, touch screen, superb audio quality, 52 hour battery life. The only downside is an unrefined UI; the D2+ is supposed to fix that but I haven't had experience on it. The first UI is some minor annoyances, but I've never had a real problem with it.
No. It's identical except for the colour theme. They didn't even fix the ID3 problem.Defiance wrote:
I've read of it's possibility, but never bothered to try it. Do you think it's a good improvement over the original firmware?Freezer7Pro wrote:
Cowon D2+ = Cowon D2 with another colour. I run D2+ firmware on my D2.Defiance wrote:
Eloquent in it's brevi- wait, no.
I assume the first thing you would have suggested is the Cowon D2+.
Scissors:
Small, flash, SD slot, touch screen, superb audio quality, 52 hour battery life. The only downside is an unrefined UI; the D2+ is supposed to fix that but I haven't had experience on it. The first UI is some minor annoyances, but I've never had a real problem with it.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
One of my friends told me to seek help.Sup wrote:
minty +1
Silly girl doesn't get what this is all about
It's so not worth its £189 street price for a 16GB. Sure, it's quite nice, but it's nothing spectacular or impressive. It's a basic touchscreen with an average UI. I really wouldn't reccommend it.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Cowon D2+ = Cowon D2 with another colour. I run D2+ firmware on my D2.Defiance wrote:
Eloquent in it's brevi- wait, no.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Neither, get a proper portable music player.
I assume the first thing you would have suggested is the Cowon D2+.
Scissors:
Small, flash, SD slot, touch screen, superb audio quality, 52 hour battery life. The only downside is an unrefined UI; the D2+ is supposed to fix that but I haven't had experience on it. The first UI is some minor annoyances, but I've never had a real problem with it.
What I would recommend is either the new Sony Walkman NWZ-X1050 16GB X-Series or the Samsung YP-P3 (I currently have this, and the little widgets and shit are fantastic. Granted, the touchscreen is not as good as the Touch, but it's pretty damn responsive and much better than most other touchscreens out there).
And if you don't mind having something slightly bigger (not clunkier) then grab the Archos 5 Internet Tablet. It's hellishly sexy and runs on Android.
Psh, I TOLD her that, yet:.Sup wrote:
she should have listened to some of that ear sex and then speakmcminty wrote:
One of my friends told me to seek help.Sup wrote:
minty +1
Silly girl doesn't get what this is all about
/picard facepalm picture..."I barely listen to music"..
The D2 is much worth its price. The thing about it is not flashy features or ease of use (as it thoroughly fails at those), it is sound quality. You simply don't get much better sound from a portable device. The SDHC slot is also sex, running 16+16GB myself.Zimmer wrote:
It's so not worth its £189 street price for a 16GB. Sure, it's quite nice, but it's nothing spectacular or impressive. It's a basic touchscreen with an average UI. I really wouldn't reccommend it.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Cowon D2+ = Cowon D2 with another colour. I run D2+ firmware on my D2.Defiance wrote:
Eloquent in it's brevi- wait, no.
I assume the first thing you would have suggested is the Cowon D2+.
Scissors:
Small, flash, SD slot, touch screen, superb audio quality, 52 hour battery life. The only downside is an unrefined UI; the D2+ is supposed to fix that but I haven't had experience on it. The first UI is some minor annoyances, but I've never had a real problem with it.
What I would recommend is either the new Sony Walkman NWZ-X1050 16GB X-Series or the Samsung YP-P3 (I currently have this, and the little widgets and shit are fantastic. Granted, the touchscreen is not as good as the Touch, but it's pretty damn responsive and much better than most other touchscreens out there).
And if you don't mind having something slightly bigger (not clunkier) then grab the Archos 5 Internet Tablet. It's hellishly sexy and runs on Android.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Actually, I think you'll find that both my recommendations either match or are better than the D2 with sound quality (read reviews, the Sony's sound quality is absolutely amazing).Freezer7Pro wrote:
The D2 is much worth its price. The thing about it is not flashy features or ease of use (as it thoroughly fails at those), it is sound quality. You simply don't get much better sound from a portable device. The SDHC slot is also sex, running 16+16GB myself.
If it sounds different, it's altering the sound. The D2 is very neutral, which is great from a studio perspective, but many think it sounds too "flat" or "boring".Zimmer wrote:
Actually, I think you'll find that both my recommendations either match or are better than the D2 with sound quality (read reviews, the Sony's sound quality is absolutely amazing).Freezer7Pro wrote:
The D2 is much worth its price. The thing about it is not flashy features or ease of use (as it thoroughly fails at those), it is sound quality. You simply don't get much better sound from a portable device. The SDHC slot is also sex, running 16+16GB myself.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
That's what I mean by amazing sound quality.Freezer7Pro wrote:
If it sounds different, it's altering the sound. The D2 is very neutral, which is great from a studio perspective, but many think it sounds too "flat" or "boring".Zimmer wrote:
Actually, I think you'll find that both my recommendations either match or are better than the D2 with sound quality (read reviews, the Sony's sound quality is absolutely amazing).Freezer7Pro wrote:
The D2 is much worth its price. The thing about it is not flashy features or ease of use (as it thoroughly fails at those), it is sound quality. You simply don't get much better sound from a portable device. The SDHC slot is also sex, running 16+16GB myself.
What do you mean by that?Zimmer wrote:
That's what I mean by amazing sound quality.Freezer7Pro wrote:
If it sounds different, it's altering the sound. The D2 is very neutral, which is great from a studio perspective, but many think it sounds too "flat" or "boring".Zimmer wrote:
Actually, I think you'll find that both my recommendations either match or are better than the D2 with sound quality (read reviews, the Sony's sound quality is absolutely amazing).
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
As in, the two players I described don't "sound different" and aren't altering the sound. They have "perfect" sound quality. Like the D2, I'm sure, but it's such a flimsy UI in comparison.
I see.Zimmer wrote:
As in, the two players I described don't "sound different" and aren't altering the sound. They have "perfect" sound quality. Like the D2, I'm sure, but it's such a flimsy UI in comparison.
I found some measurements of both the Sony and the Samsung, and they're indeed quite similar to the D2 in sound performance. But really, the D2 is £100 cheaper than the Sony, so price:performance is quite a bit better if you're looking for good sound.
Last edited by Freezer7Pro (2009-11-04 06:17:02)
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Oh right, yeah, the Sony is a tad expensive for what you get. Thing is, you get some pretty damn good earphones as well. Ones you don't need to replace.Freezer7Pro wrote:
I see.Zimmer wrote:
As in, the two players I described don't "sound different" and aren't altering the sound. They have "perfect" sound quality. Like the D2, I'm sure, but it's such a flimsy UI in comparison.
I found some measurements of both the Sony and the Samsung, and they're indeed quite similar to the D2 in sound performance. But really, the D2 is £100 cheaper than the Sony, so price:performance is quite a bit better if you're looking for good sound.
The Samsung is £10 more than the D2+ and has a much nicer UI.
To be honest, in the end, it's entirely down to preference. Also, there is no point in having a media player with fantastic sound quality if you don't have the earphones to go with them (I do, UE 700 )
Indeed, if you value UI, the D2 is NOT for you.Zimmer wrote:
Oh right, yeah, the Sony is a tad expensive for what you get. Thing is, you get some pretty damn good earphones as well. Ones you don't need to replace.Freezer7Pro wrote:
I see.Zimmer wrote:
As in, the two players I described don't "sound different" and aren't altering the sound. They have "perfect" sound quality. Like the D2, I'm sure, but it's such a flimsy UI in comparison.
I found some measurements of both the Sony and the Samsung, and they're indeed quite similar to the D2 in sound performance. But really, the D2 is £100 cheaper than the Sony, so price:performance is quite a bit better if you're looking for good sound.
The Samsung is £10 more than the D2+ and has a much nicer UI.
To be honest, in the end, it's entirely down to preference. Also, there is no point in having a media player with fantastic sound quality if you don't have the earphones to go with them (I do, UE 700 )
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Downloading Ubuntu now. For some reason they teaching my girl how to write documents using the terminal or some shit, so now I gotta download to teach myself so I can teach her in turn.
Ah well, I love the idea of using it again.
Ah well, I love the idea of using it again.
Intel Core i7 CPU 920 @ 4GHz || 3x2 GB OCZ 1600Mhz DDR3 || 80GB Intel X25-M Gen 2 || KFA2 GTX 480 1536Mb ||| Samsung T220 || Xonar DX 7.1 || AV 40 || P6T Deluxe V2 || Win 7 HP 64 Bit || Lian Li P80