Dude don't blame him, after the little prank here on bf2s.com(April fools) no one believed me when i told them.. they were telling me i was an idiot and that it was just a prank even after i told them to check everywhere else. THANKS bf2s.com .ExecutionerStyle wrote:
It's not april fools you nub, look in BFHQ or BF2Player.
Last edited by Kmarion (2006-04-02 12:01:24)
Well, Glopje admited that it was a glitch and it happened once, He was reset because EA does not think it was a problem with their game and was a hax. Dear EA, plz for the games sake take a look at all the glitches in the game and admit this was their fault and not the players fault. This does not apply to CEA, who abused and admitted to abusing.General-Echo wrote:
Guys remember glopje? He got his by this commander bug and got a shitload of commander points in a couple of rounds. Ea wiped his stats cause he abused the bug/glitch to get more points. I think these guys are doing the same thing.
Last edited by SnobbyBoss (2006-04-04 17:09:57)
no it was ram de search upyorarse.strangelove wrote:
is his name search?
U did not open sarcasm , so u can's close it.ThundergodTyLor wrote:
Nice comeback.
</sarcasm>
Like EA need anyone to make them look bad[TPG]Skitz wrote:
If you google search for CEA Battlefield 2, this is the webpage you get
http://www.bfcea.com/
google attempted to translate that spanish garbage, and this is the address for that
http://translate.google.com/translate?h … l%26sa%3DG
if you scroll down through the translation, you can kind of make sense of some things
"Also I want to clarify that we have not used any cheto. We have altered the original archives of the game, neither used no external application nor na of na. Single we have discovered bug of the game, and we have taken advantage of him to ridicule to EA."
basically they're saying that they altered parts of the game to make EA look bad. What assholes. get a life
Translation: never been right and never will be[TPG]Skitz wrote:
basically they're saying that they altered parts of the game to make EA look bad. What assholes. get a life
Last edited by Daveoh (2006-04-08 18:00:28)
God, I bet you thought you'd look sooo intelligent, didn't you?Sophoz wrote:
The reason the number seems so special is because it is FFFF in Hex. That is why the maximum number of rows in excel is 65535, the programers used a 4 bit register to define the row number. So the 10th row would be 000A (in computers memory, hex) or row 65535 is (FFFF). You can do conversions using the calculator on your computer. If this number is maximum for anything dealing with computers, I would gurantee it is because it was written using 4 bit registers.
...
...
...
Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2006-04-14 18:06:09)
Lol dumbass, he clearly was referencing hex bits "(in computers memory, hex)", not binary bits.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
God, I bet you thought you'd look sooo intelligent, didn't you?Sophoz wrote:
The reason the number seems so special is because it is FFFF in Hex. That is why the maximum number of rows in excel is 65535, the programers used a 4 bit register to define the row number. So the 10th row would be 000A (in computers memory, hex) or row 65535 is (FFFF). You can do conversions using the calculator on your computer. If this number is maximum for anything dealing with computers, I would gurantee it is because it was written using 4 bit registers.
...
...
...
But, no, instead you made yourself look like a doofus.
How so?
Simple - it's 2 BYTES or 16 bits not, as you incorrectly state, 4 bits.
4bits can only store numbers between 0 and 15 (inclusive) making everything you say wrong by a factor of 4369!
It really doesn't matter how the hell they're sent, more how they're interpretted by the server (which is in hex).(and then there's the stuff you said elsewhere about numbers being sent to the server in hex, rather than decimal ?????? - they're sent as neither - they're sent as binary)
Last edited by 7h3647h32in6 (2006-04-14 18:18:59)
No they're not - all CPUs manipulate binary and only binary. Hex, decimal and any number-base other than binary are only used when displaying numbers in form that we humans find easier to understand (and if it's the case of displaying a binary string, such as "11111111"). And even then, those 'hex' (or whatever base) strings are represented in ASCII - i.e. each character is itself nothing more than a binary pattern. EVERYTHING in computers is stored/sent/manipulated in binary and binary only.7h3647h32in6 wrote:
Lol dumbass, he clearly was referencing hex bits "(in computers memory, hex)", not binary bits.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
God, I bet you thought you'd look sooo intelligent, didn't you?Sophoz wrote:
The reason the number seems so special is because it is FFFF in Hex. That is why the maximum number of rows in excel is 65535, the programers used a 4 bit register to define the row number. So the 10th row would be 000A (in computers memory, hex) or row 65535 is (FFFF). You can do conversions using the calculator on your computer. If this number is maximum for anything dealing with computers, I would gurantee it is because it was written using 4 bit registers.
...
...
...
But, no, instead you made yourself look like a doofus.
How so?
Simple - it's 2 BYTES or 16 bits not, as you incorrectly state, 4 bits.
4bits can only store numbers between 0 and 15 (inclusive) making everything you say wrong by a factor of 4369!
There's no such thing as a 'hex bit' - what you're talking about is called a 'nibble'.It really doesn't matter how the hell they're sent, more how they're interpretted by the server (which is in hex).(and then there's the stuff you said elsewhere about numbers being sent to the server in hex, rather than decimal ?????? - they're sent as neither - they're sent as binary)