What a dumbass.
What a dumbass.
checkered Vans? that is so
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|7109
Kickass
what happens in 3 years when it comes out that monster shrinks your member?
Monster is fucking lush though
Monster are awesome drink, nice logo, but fuck sakes! Not a tattoo of it
Is he charging Monster drink for leasing his leg
pointless tattoo.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Monster sucks. They're suing a small brewery in Vermont that makes a beer called Vermonster. Because they have the word monster in their name.
It's like when Monster Cables sued a minigolf place called Monster Mini Golf.
It's like when Monster Cables sued a minigolf place called Monster Mini Golf.
sick tat brah
He probably did it to distract everyone from his lack of any leg hair.
Gay.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
So basically he paid to advertise Monster.
you have to shave the area before getting it tatted, but good tryYellowman03 wrote:
He probably did it to distract everyone from his lack of any leg hair.
the whole leg? try looking plzwhaaaaaaaaaat wrote:
you have to shave the area before getting it tatted, but good tryYellowman03 wrote:
He probably did it to distract everyone from his lack of any leg hair.
It's pretty well done. It really looks like the skin was torn away.
yeah well, if i was going to shave a part of my leg i would do the whole leg. how stupid would it look to have one spot on ur leg without hair and everything around it with hair.Yellowman03 wrote:
the whole leg? try looking plzwhaaaaaaaaaat wrote:
you have to shave the area before getting it tatted, but good tryYellowman03 wrote:
He probably did it to distract everyone from his lack of any leg hair.
also if they payed him to do the advertisement then they probably made him shave the whole leg so it would look much clearer.
fail more plzYellowman03 wrote:
the whole leg? try looking plzwhaaaaaaaaaat wrote:
you have to shave the area before getting it tatted, but good tryYellowman03 wrote:
He probably did it to distract everyone from his lack of any leg hair.
A friend of a friend, done by a friend of a friend's friend.
My thoughts exactly. That effect is pretty cool.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
It's pretty well done. It really looks like the skin was torn away.
But it's still a stupid tattoo and I'd never want one.
the artist can pen some ink thats for sure. Im sure the dude has his reasons for getting this particular tattoo. Its not for you guys to like, its for him to like.
pretty amateur thatFinray wrote:
http://i1.bebo.com/052b/13/large/2009/1 … 62599l.jpg
A friend of a friend, done by a friend of a friend's friend.
If that were the case he would put the tattoo somewhere only he could see and isn't visible to the public.SonderKommando wrote:
Its not for you guys to like, its for him to like.
great beer btwHurricane2k9 wrote:
Monster sucks. They're suing a small brewery in Vermont that makes a beer called Vermonster. Because they have the word monster in their name.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
Yahuh.TPM-J45P3R- wrote:
pretty amateur thatFinray wrote:
http://i1.bebo.com/052b/13/large/2009/1 … 62599l.jpg
A friend of a friend, done by a friend of a friend's friend.