Cue U.S. Office vs. British Office debate.

Creed's quality is millions of times better than stanley's.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
He doesn't get enough face time for him to be the best.
(quality) x (facetime) = awesome index
Creed has an awesome index of .01. Stanley has an awesome index of .7.
What is the highest awesome index and the lowest?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
He doesn't get enough face time for him to be the best.
(quality) x (facetime) = awesome index
Creed has an awesome index of .01. Stanley has an awesome index of .7.
so by simple math creed is better than stanley.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Yet even a secondary character has 1 million times the face time of Creed.
So who's the best?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
way to take hyperbole miggle
Fact is, he gets maybe a line every three shows. It's fucking funny, but that can't make him the best character.
10 is the highest, with a quality max of 10 and a face time rating of 1.
Obviously Creed!Miggle wrote:
So who's the best?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
way to take hyperbole miggle
Fact is, he gets maybe a line every three shows. It's fucking funny, but that can't make him the best character.
10 is the highest, with a quality max of 10 and a face time rating of 1.
What debate? British office clearly > US office. That isn't to say US isn't funny though. Steve Carell plays awkward very well.Miggle wrote:
Cue U.S. Office vs. British Office debate.
everything in America is trash.nukchebi0 wrote:
The Office is not funny. I don't understand it's appeal. Is the British version perhaps superior to the trash I've seen in America?
It was mildly entertaining before it became immensely popular and the story developed, now it just keeps getting worse.nukchebi0 wrote:
The Office is not funny. I don't understand it's appeal. Is the British version perhaps superior to the trash I've seen in America?