Must have been fun knocking down the other half with a crane.. BTW more pics and video at the site posted in the OP
I read that in the newspaper yesterday
Very lucky it didn't nail the building next to it.
Very lucky it didn't nail the building next to it.
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
.Sup wrote:
made in China
Kurazoo wrote:
.Sup wrote:
made in China
No, I don't need an attitude adjustment. You just need to fuck off.
Eifa wrote:
Kurazoo wrote:
.Sup wrote:
made in China

There's smart fellow on that site.By the way, for all you guys who think that some government agency guys snuck into the Twin Towers one night and set them up for demolition the next day, when some OTHER guys flew airliners into them, take a look at what happens when you make a little mistake.....
- Ralph A. Volpi
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Seems more or less completely void of meaning.-Sh1fty- wrote:
There's smart fellow on that site.By the way, for all you guys who think that some government agency guys snuck into the Twin Towers one night and set them up for demolition the next day, when some OTHER guys flew airliners into them, take a look at what happens when you make a little mistake.....
- Ralph A. Volpi
I've seen worse, remember that building which literally rolled over. I shit you not, the building rolled over.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8179857.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8179857.stm
Holy fuck.Mekstizzle wrote:
I've seen worse, remember that building which literally rolled over. I shit you not, the building rolled over.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8179857.stm
Yeah sorry it was offtopic. But remember my thread in DS&T about those idiots who thought the buildings on 9/11 were blown up by explosives? I'm saying that level of accuracy in the demolition isn't possible without lots of people noticing the work being done. IMOmikkel wrote:
Seems more or less completely void of meaning.-Sh1fty- wrote:
There's smart fellow on that site.By the way, for all you guys who think that some government agency guys snuck into the Twin Towers one night and set them up for demolition the next day, when some OTHER guys flew airliners into them, take a look at what happens when you make a little mistake.....
- Ralph A. Volpi
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
What I'm saying is that you're trying to push the point that it would be impossible to do a demolition as precise as what happened to the World Trade Centers with outside influences as disruptive as two large aircraft flying into them, when the reality of the matter is that two large aircraft flew into them and caused "that level of accuracy". It seems pretty dense to suggest that what happened couldn't happen.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Yeah sorry it was offtopic. But remember my thread in DS&T about those idiots who thought the buildings on 9/11 were blown up by explosives? I'm saying that level of accuracy in the demolition isn't possible without lots of people noticing the work being done. IMOmikkel wrote:
Seems more or less completely void of meaning.-Sh1fty- wrote:
There's smart fellow on that site.
wow - that was very well built in the first place, I would suggest.Mekstizzle wrote:
I've seen worse, remember that building which literally rolled over. I shit you not, the building rolled over.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8179857.stm
So you're saying it was blown up by explosives and didn't collapse by getting hit by 2 freaking huge planes?
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
obviously the building has been touched by Chuck Norris himself.ruisleipa wrote:
wow - that was very well built in the first place, I would suggest.Mekstizzle wrote:
I've seen worse, remember that building which literally rolled over. I shit you not, the building rolled over.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8179857.stm
No, I'm saying that it's dense to discount the notion based on evidence that is in no way contrary to it.-Sh1fty- wrote:
So you're saying it was blown up by explosives and didn't collapse by getting hit by 2 freaking huge planes?
seems like the best way to do it to me! You get to do it twice!
this is why you hire trained demolitions experts instead of guys with dynamite to do these things.
Building demolitions always amazed me. I've watched shows on the TV about demolition experts and I find very interesting that a charge misplaced by 5 meters can make the whole operation fail. Like in this video
This is much more entertaining that some expert demo team.S.Lythberg wrote:
this is why you hire trained demolitions experts instead of guys with dynamite to do these things.
"Raise the flag high! Let the degenerates know who comes to claim their lives this day!"
Why is the video not in this thread?!?!
CONTRIBUTING
http://www.break.com/index/demolition-f … tower.html
CONTRIBUTING
http://www.break.com/index/demolition-f … tower.html
QFT, expert demo teams have a less chance of blowing themselves up. Wheres the fun in safety.Blade4509 wrote:
This is much more entertaining that some expert demo team.S.Lythberg wrote:
this is why you hire trained demolitions experts instead of guys with dynamite to do these things.