Pages: 1
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Somali shot after allegedly attempting to attack Danish cartoonist
At this point, the guy should make a shitload more of these mooslim-angering image, publish em, and get the fuck away to a place were the mooslim population is slim to none. (Canada, cuba...etc etc)
The last attempt to retaliate the publication of these cartoons was funded and masterminded by a Canadian.Roger Lesboules wrote:
At this point, the guy should make a shitload more of these mooslim-angering image, publish em, and get the fuck away to a place were the mooslim population is slim to none. (Canada, cuba...etc etc)
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Can … story.html
Edmonton lol. Fucking hick city.mikkel wrote:
The last attempt to retaliate the publication of these cartoons was funded and masterminded by a Canadian.Roger Lesboules wrote:
At this point, the guy should make a shitload more of these mooslim-angering image, publish em, and get the fuck away to a place were the mooslim population is slim to none. (Canada, cuba...etc etc)
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Can … story.html
This was probably one of the things where you can point out and go, the Muslim world is fucking idiotic. Moreso than any other religious world. Why do they have to get all angry and violent over it. I can understand the whole issue of how it's blasphemous to have images of Muhammad, but it stops there. Firstly who gives a shit what some random Danish person does, secondly, there's no need to resort to violence and riots over it all. Just complete nonsense.
The irony is in their reaction. They were pissed at an image depicting Islam as an angry, violent religion and what was their response? To get angry and violent.Mekstizzle wrote:
This was probably one of the things where you can point out and go, the Muslim world is fucking idiotic. Moreso than any other religious world. Why do they have to get all angry and violent over it. I can understand the whole issue of how it's blasphemous to have images of Muhammad, but it stops there. Firstly who gives a shit what some random Danish person does, secondly, there's no need to resort to violence and riots over it all. Just complete nonsense.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
That's not completely accurate. The image was meant to portray the disconcerting trend of certain organisations to invoke the prophet in order to further their agenda, not that Islam as a whole is a violent religion. Certain muslims residing in Denmark then toured the Middle East, bringing along the published caricatures, translating them with malicious inaccuracy and painting a very negative and very untrue image of Denmark and the opinions held towards Islam by the Danish population, as well as a series of images supposedly commissioned by themselves, depicting the prophet in the shape of a pig, and various other blasphemous forms.JohnG@lt wrote:
The irony is in their reaction. They were pissed at an image depicting Islam as an angry, violent religion and what was their response? To get angry and violent.Mekstizzle wrote:
This was probably one of the things where you can point out and go, the Muslim world is fucking idiotic. Moreso than any other religious world. Why do they have to get all angry and violent over it. I can understand the whole issue of how it's blasphemous to have images of Muhammad, but it stops there. Firstly who gives a shit what some random Danish person does, secondly, there's no need to resort to violence and riots over it all. Just complete nonsense.
What happened was precisely what the caricature criticised. A small group of extremists invoked the prophet to further their agenda, deceiving influential muslims, who again influenced their followings, who ended up with a belief that the caricatures were produced as an attack on Islam by a nation and a people fiercely opposed to it.
A deceived public waging a war based on lies.
Last edited by mikkel (2010-01-03 11:22:12)
Mikkel's right. And sadly... it demonstrates 2 things.
1) The Islamic World has a big problem with ignorance of the outside world.
2) Orthodox interpretations of Islam really do lend themselves to violence.
1) The Islamic World has a big problem with ignorance of the outside world.
2) Orthodox interpretations of Islam really do lend themselves to violence.
They may have been deceived into thinking it was worse than it actually was, but at the end of the day, even if they were fooled into thinking it was an attack on Islam, that still, still doesn't fucking mean they had to act like they did. Don't care how you can twist it around, there's no need to act so retarded like that.
JohnG@lt wrote:
The irony is in their reaction. They were pissed at an image depicting Islam as an angry, violent religion and what was their response? To get angry and violent.Mekstizzle wrote:
This was probably one of the things where you can point out and go, the Muslim world is fucking idiotic. Moreso than any other religious world. Why do they have to get all angry and violent over it. I can understand the whole issue of how it's blasphemous to have images of Muhammad, but it stops there. Firstly who gives a shit what some random Danish person does, secondly, there's no need to resort to violence and riots over it all. Just complete nonsense.
I don't think anyone here is saying that there is.Mekstizzle wrote:
They may have been deceived into thinking it was worse than it actually was, but at the end of the day, even if they were fooled into thinking it was an attack on Islam, that still, still doesn't fucking mean they had to act like they did. Don't care how you can twist it around, there's no need to act so retarded like that.
Pshhhh...Ontariomikkel wrote:
The last attempt to retaliate the publication of these cartoons was funded and masterminded by a Canadian.Roger Lesboules wrote:
At this point, the guy should make a shitload more of these mooslim-angering image, publish em, and get the fuck away to a place were the mooslim population is slim to none. (Canada, cuba...etc etc)
http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Can … story.html
It was a provocation in the name of freedom of speech, afair.mikkel wrote:
That's not completely accurate. The image was meant to portray the disconcerting trend of certain organisations to invoke the prophet in order to further their agenda, not that Islam as a whole is a violent religion.
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
Cybargs wrote:
They don't sell those there? You could make a fortune if you were the only shaving equipment supplier there. Add a nice Alah logo and you're set
As published by Jyllands-Posten. The caricaturists were simply contracted to create images of Mohammad.Beduin wrote:
It was a provocation in the name of freedom of speech, afair.mikkel wrote:
That's not completely accurate. The image was meant to portray the disconcerting trend of certain organisations to invoke the prophet in order to further their agenda, not that Islam as a whole is a violent religion.
hmm.. this one makes me think that they knew a little bit about the content..mikkel wrote:
As published by Jyllands-Posten. The caricaturists were simply contracted to create images of Mohammad.Beduin wrote:
It was a provocation in the name of freedom of speech, afair.mikkel wrote:
That's not completely accurate. The image was meant to portray the disconcerting trend of certain organisations to invoke the prophet in order to further their agenda, not that Islam as a whole is a violent religion.
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
Of course the brighter amongst them were able to deduce the fairly obvious fact that it was a journalistic provocation. What I'm telling you is that it wasn't a bunch of artists getting together and deciding to insult Islam. The part of my post that you reference reports the motivation and meaning behind the caricature in question as described by the artist himself.Beduin wrote:
hmm.. this one makes me think that they knew a little bit about the content..mikkel wrote:
As published by Jyllands-Posten. The caricaturists were simply contracted to create images of Mohammad.Beduin wrote:
It was a provocation in the name of freedom of speech, afair.
http://i228.photobucket.com/albums/ee37 … ammed1.jpg
tja.. long time ago anyway. I have bad memory
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
...show me the schematic
Bonus info: I attended the elementary school referenced in the example you posted. Same class, too. 7.A at Valby Skole.Beduin wrote:
tja.. long time ago anyway. I have bad memory
Pages: 1
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Somali shot after allegedly attempting to attack Danish cartoonist