I'm using a 64bit windows xp.
And don't worry about the mac thing.
And don't worry about the mac thing.
That's not how it works. A 32-bit OS has enough address spaces that total 4GB. Even with a 1GB video card he would still have enough address space for 3GB of RAM, which is what he has. There may be a very small loss below that for other computer items that need to map address space, but that would be minuscule at best.Stubbee wrote:
as long as you are running a 64 bit OS no problem; otherwise your usable RAM will drop to 2.5GB from 3.0GB by upgrading to a 1GB video card.
wrongAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
That's not how it works. A 32-bit OS has enough address spaces that total 4GB. Even with a 1GB video card he would still have enough address space for 3GB of RAM, which is what he has. There may be a very small loss below that for other computer items that need to map address space, but that would be minuscule at best.Stubbee wrote:
as long as you are running a 64 bit OS no problem; otherwise your usable RAM will drop to 2.5GB from 3.0GB by upgrading to a 1GB video card.
Last edited by Stubbee (2010-01-11 10:22:29)
Urgh, someone tell him what happens with 32bit OS please.Stubbee wrote:
wrongAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
That's not how it works. A 32-bit OS has enough address spaces that total 4GB. Even with a 1GB video card he would still have enough address space for 3GB of RAM, which is what he has. There may be a very small loss below that for other computer items that need to map address space, but that would be minuscule at best.Stubbee wrote:
as long as you are running a 64 bit OS no problem; otherwise your usable RAM will drop to 2.5GB from 3.0GB by upgrading to a 1GB video card.
there is about 500MB worth of reserved I/O besides the video card. Keyboard, mouse, DMA, PCIe, ethernet, modem, sound and quite a few other system resources require I/O addresses.
I have 4GB installed but with a 256MB video card i had access to 3.25 GB.
I upgrade to a 512MB video card and now my system has access to 3.0 GB.
hey big mouthCammRobb wrote:
Urgh, someone tell him what happens with 32bit OS please.Stubbee wrote:
wrongAgent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
That's not how it works. A 32-bit OS has enough address spaces that total 4GB. Even with a 1GB video card he would still have enough address space for 3GB of RAM, which is what he has. There may be a very small loss below that for other computer items that need to map address space, but that would be minuscule at best.
there is about 500MB worth of reserved I/O besides the video card. Keyboard, mouse, DMA, PCIe, ethernet, modem, sound and quite a few other system resources require I/O addresses.
I have 4GB installed but with a 256MB video card i had access to 3.25 GB.
I upgrade to a 512MB video card and now my system has access to 3.0 GB.
hey small brainStubbee wrote:
hey big mouthCammRobb wrote:
Urgh, someone tell him what happens with 32bit OS please.Stubbee wrote:
wrong
there is about 500MB worth of reserved I/O besides the video card. Keyboard, mouse, DMA, PCIe, ethernet, modem, sound and quite a few other system resources require I/O addresses.
I have 4GB installed but with a 256MB video card i had access to 3.25 GB.
I upgrade to a 512MB video card and now my system has access to 3.0 GB.
you tell me since you are so smart
Okay, give me half an hour once I come back from my break.Stubbee wrote:
ah you don't know but you know i am wrong.
Either prove I am wrong or GTFO
Last edited by Stubbee (2010-01-11 11:14:34)
^^Right answer...Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
That's not how it works. A 32-bit OS has enough address spaces that total 4GB. Even with a 1GB video card he would still have enough address space for 3GB of RAM, which is what he has. There may be a very small loss below that for other computer items that need to map address space, but that would be minuscule at best.Stubbee wrote:
as long as you are running a 64 bit OS no problem; otherwise your usable RAM will drop to 2.5GB from 3.0GB by upgrading to a 1GB video card.
Riiiiight.presidentsheep wrote:
^^Right answer...Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
That's not how it works. A 32-bit OS has enough address spaces that total 4GB. Even with a 1GB video card he would still have enough address space for 3GB of RAM, which is what he has. There may be a very small loss below that for other computer items that need to map address space, but that would be minuscule at best.Stubbee wrote:
as long as you are running a 64 bit OS no problem; otherwise your usable RAM will drop to 2.5GB from 3.0GB by upgrading to a 1GB video card.
+ FUCKING ONE.CapnNismo wrote:
Geeze Stubb, if you're so adamant about being right and proving everyone wrong how about you go and look for the answer on a proper tech website? Quit talking about your e-penis and just slap the bitch on the table and show what's what. Or keep it in your pants, tucked between your legs. Fuck man, you guys are ruining a perfectly good thread with this childish BS.
It can be around 500MBs worth of IO address space. It depends how much hardware you've got.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
I think you're up in the night on how much room is required for I/O and other functions. I ran an XP system with a 512MB video card (8800GT) and 4GB of RAM, and still managed to have 3.15GB of usable RAM, and that included dual NICs, an X-fi sound card, and a 2-port RAID controller card, not to mention whatever else the system must have running.
Last edited by Bertster7 (2010-01-11 12:41:07)
Fuck. I'll try to explain simply,Stubbee wrote:
Riiiiight.presidentsheep wrote:
^^Right answer...Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
That's not how it works. A 32-bit OS has enough address spaces that total 4GB. Even with a 1GB video card he would still have enough address space for 3GB of RAM, which is what he has. There may be a very small loss below that for other computer items that need to map address space, but that would be minuscule at best.
Your proof?
ThisNic wrote:
aaaannnnyyywaaaaaaaaaaaaaay...
go with the 5770 for that price range.
I realize what is installed can make a difference. That's why I noted that I had a substantial amount of additional hardware installed, beyond that stuff integrated into the motherboard, and that used ~350MB, and that is probably an excess. As far as the video card, I think it is discretely mapped into that address space, as even in 2D mode when only a fraction of video memory is used the available RAM appears to be missing.Bertster7 wrote:
It can be around 500MBs worth of IO address space. It depends how much hardware you've got.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
I think you're up in the night on how much room is required for I/O and other functions. I ran an XP system with a 512MB video card (8800GT) and 4GB of RAM, and still managed to have 3.15GB of usable RAM, and that included dual NICs, an X-fi sound card, and a 2-port RAID controller card, not to mention whatever else the system must have running.
As far as I'm aware the memory on video cards is not discretely mapped though, so all this bollocks he's spouting about a 1GB video card taking up 1GB of address space is total bullshit.
I've checked this now. Video RAM is definitely not discretely mapped. A video card takes up the same amount of address space as any other device using the same slot. It is just the mapping of the number of lanes to the card.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
I realize what is installed can make a difference. That's why I noted that I had a substantial amount of additional hardware installed, beyond that stuff integrated into the motherboard, and that used ~350MB, and that is probably an excess. As far as the video card, I think it is discretely mapped into that address space, as even in 2D mode when only a fraction of video memory is used the available RAM appears to be missing.Bertster7 wrote:
It can be around 500MBs worth of IO address space. It depends how much hardware you've got.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
I think you're up in the night on how much room is required for I/O and other functions. I ran an XP system with a 512MB video card (8800GT) and 4GB of RAM, and still managed to have 3.15GB of usable RAM, and that included dual NICs, an X-fi sound card, and a 2-port RAID controller card, not to mention whatever else the system must have running.
As far as I'm aware the memory on video cards is not discretely mapped though, so all this bollocks he's spouting about a 1GB video card taking up 1GB of address space is total bullshit.