Bertster7 wrote:
Winston_Churchill wrote:
I never said picture quality and neither of you showed a post where I said that. As a general rule of thumb, the higher the quality of the movie the more strain it will put on your media player to output it. Most computers, even low end can play 720p and even scene quality 1080p, but once you get into the higher bitrate 1080p movies they cant play it without proper codecs and media players. CoreAVC offers this advantage over CCCP.
Have you ever tried using CoreAVC on something that could otherwise not play a movie?
Yes you did.
Whether you meant to or not is another matter. But in the post we've quoted you clearly did say that.
In any case, CoreAVC is a premium codec pack you need to pay for. To buy it or illegally obtain when you don't need it is stupid. Since any vaguely modern CPU (C2D or newer) can easily decode 1080p content without breaking a sweat then it's really not that useful.
MPC-HC allows you to customise your shaders completely to optimise playback for your displays absolutely perfectly. This means you can get better quality from MPC - which is far more important than being able to playback obscenely high quality video on rubbish computers.
You've got your priorities all wrong.
No, I didnt. You're reading it wrong.
And again, my very first post
Winston_Churchill wrote:
downloading Media Player Classic - Home Cinema and installing CoreAVC
I use MPC-HC on my main desktop and love it. I prefer it in many cases.
However, the point I was making is that CoreAVC allows for high quality movies to be played on nearly any computer. My laptop has a C2D CPU and frequently struggles and has jitter with high bitrate encodes when I use MPC-HC. However, when I use KMPlayer it does not.
This wasnt meant to be a MPC-HC vs KMPlayer argument. I use both and both are great for their uses. What I'm saying is that CoreAVC, a pack you clearly havent even tried, provides superior efficiency for playback of encodes over CCCP and the like.