Last edited by Ultrafunkula (2010-03-02 04:36:22)
Those are hawt.mcminty wrote:
Like me?FEOS wrote:
One of the camera dudes
My travel and landscape photos say thats BS..
if you are being serious, I agree with you. The peel apart Polaroid film can make for some very beautiful photography prints.Uzique wrote:
people should get back into polaroids the shots are awesome
Last edited by west-phoenix-az (2010-03-02 08:06:34)
My snowboard photography (with a Nikon) agrees with you.mcminty wrote:
Like me?FEOS wrote:
One of the camera dudes
My travel and landscape photos say thats BS..
I got an account on it, but I never use it.Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
sweet pics defcon are you on flickr?
apples and oranges here
i am a nikon d90 so i say nikon . . .
This. Just try them.mcminty wrote:
This, lol..DefCon-17 wrote:
This'll go nowhere.
Nikon fans will say Nikon, Canon fans will say Canon.
(..I say Nikon)
I'd say Canon, cause I'm a Canon shooter..
The best advice would be to go to the store and ask if you can play around with the cameras. Whatever feels more comfortable..
There is actually a trend now.. Photographers are breaking out their old (non digital SLRs). Since it cost more to use film I think it makes you prepare and think more. The results are earned. They might be looking to get high off of dark room chemicals also. .tuckergustav wrote:
if you are being serious, I agree with you. The peel apart Polaroid film can make for some very beautiful photography prints.Uzique wrote:
people should get back into polaroids the shots are awesome
Or it hampers your skill development because you're scared to take chances.Kmarion wrote:
There is actually a trend now.. Photographers are breaking out their old (non digital SLRs). Since it cost more to use film I think it makes you prepare and think more. The results are earned. They might be looking to get high off of dark room chemicals also. .tuckergustav wrote:
if you are being serious, I agree with you. The peel apart Polaroid film can make for some very beautiful photography prints.Uzique wrote:
people should get back into polaroids the shots are awesome
O.. throw out a thousand lines and hope one of them bites..lol.DefCon-17 wrote:
Or it hampers your skill development because you're scared to take chances.Kmarion wrote:
There is actually a trend now.. Photographers are breaking out their old (non digital SLRs). Since it cost more to use film I think it makes you prepare and think more. The results are earned. They might be looking to get high off of dark room chemicals also. .tuckergustav wrote:
if you are being serious, I agree with you. The peel apart Polaroid film can make for some very beautiful photography prints.
This post is a contradiction.SealXo wrote:
save money, get mint XTi, get used L series lens.
own like me
More mistakes = more learning.Kmarion wrote:
O.. throw out a thousand lines and hope one of them bites..lol.DefCon-17 wrote:
Or it hampers your skill development because you're scared to take chances.Kmarion wrote:
There is actually a trend now.. Photographers are breaking out their old (non digital SLRs). Since it cost more to use film I think it makes you prepare and think more. The results are earned. They might be looking to get high off of dark room chemicals also. .
vateva!Kmarion wrote:
This post is a contradiction.SealXo wrote:
save money, get mint XTi, get used L series lens.
own like me
id rather have the 450d over an xsi because 1) video on a still camera is gay and 2) i like the scroll wheelFloppY_ wrote:
Wouldn't a Nikon D80 / EOS 450D be better entry-level SLRs ?
Last edited by SealXo (2010-03-02 13:19:25)
true.Kmarion wrote:
No one looking to save money is buying L series.
Yup. 10 years SLR (Minolta), followed by almost 10 years of DSLR (Canon). Although I shoot more per session with my DSLR, I also shot a lot with my film SLR. Simply because with film, you can't be 100% sure about your shots no matter how good or prepared you are. Film was relatively cheap. Developing them was the PITA.DefCon-17 wrote:
I'd rather take 10 shots of the same thing and get one great result for free, than 1 shot of 1 thing and pay for 1 mediocre result.
I've done about 4 years of SLR, and 3 years of DSLR. I'm glad I learned on an SLR, but a DSLR will always be my main.
you have a 1D?SealXo wrote:
since the 1D/1Ds is a fucking neckbreaker.
i thought that belonged to your ex girlfriends father . . .it's the same model, numbnutz - Xsi is North America, 450D is rest of world.SealXo wrote:
id rather have the 450d over an xsi
If it has live view I think this will allow it to shoot video.burnzz wrote:
you have a 1D? http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/21025/burnzz/hmml.png i thought that belonged to your ex girlfriends father . . .SealXo wrote:
since the 1D/1Ds is a fucking neckbreaker.it's the same model, numbnutz - Xsi is North America, 450D is rest of world.SealXo wrote:
id rather have the 450d over an xsi
i have one, and it does "Live View", not video.
Of course he doesn't own a $6k body. He's full of shit.burnzz wrote:
you have a 1D? http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/21025/burnzz/hmml.png i thought that belonged to your ex girlfriends father . . .SealXo wrote:
since the 1D/1Ds is a fucking neckbreaker.it's the same model, numbnutz - Xsi is North America, 450D is rest of world.SealXo wrote:
id rather have the 450d over an xsi
i have one, and it does "Live View", not video.
