I'm not claiming analog photography is better champ. Results may vary. It's just a different experience and people perform and react different to the processes differently. You can't tell me that some photographers don't get lazy with digital. With analog you try harder to make each shot count. That isn't to say that ultimately digital photogs aren't going to have good results. If you are sitting in front of lightroom looking at 200 photos and just picking out your favorite what ever you did on that particular shot isn't going to stick as much as what you may have done with fewer shots. Sure you can go in and look at the meta data, but when you've clouded it up with ten thousands other shots it complicates things. Some people are prone to learn by doing. You may get one great result out of nine, but you've also done it wrong nine times before.DefCon-17 wrote:
More mistakes = more learning.Kmarion wrote:
O.. throw out a thousand lines and hope one of them bites..lol.DefCon-17 wrote:
Or it hampers your skill development because you're scared to take chances.
I'd rather take 10 shots of the same thing and get one great result for free, than 1 shot of 1 thing and pay for 1 mediocre result.
I've done about 4 years of SLR, and 3 years of DSLR. I'm glad I learned on an SLR, but a DSLR will always be my main.
http://tinypic.com/m/99j611/1
Xbone Stormsurgezz