Yet another example of our fucked up sex laws... only in America....
i has nudes from school girls at my school
Turquoise wrote:
Yet another example of our fucked up sex laws... only in Texas....

Last edited by LostFate (2010-03-04 18:17:17)
xfire tbh=NHB=Shadow wrote:
i has nudes from school girls at my school
No, I wouldn't.lowing wrote:
you must not have a daughter. If you did, you would feel differently
picsoritdidnthappenPoseidon wrote:
Someone in my school actually has actually been compliling a collection of nudes from girls. When couples break up, the guys send the pics to him.
Fucked up, but kinda funny at the same time.
Spoiler (highlight to read):
of course I'm kidding as that would be illegal and I would never advocate illegal behavior
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
meh, 16 too old.Cybargs wrote:
He should've uploaded to 4chan so he wouldn't get caught.
Where it's wrong what he did, he shouldn't be tried as an adult as he's only 17.
Problem with our legal system, they just want to throw people in jail. Also they should IP who looked at the picture and arrest anyone who's over 18 as view child porn..
Problem with our legal system, they just want to throw people in jail. Also they should IP who looked at the picture and arrest anyone who's over 18 as view child porn..
Living in the information age 101: Never send someone naked pictures of yourself in electronic form unless you are comfortable with said picture ending up on the web.
Nah, don't you know? Happens all around but you're the city upon a hillTurquoise wrote:
Yet another example of our fucked up sex laws... only in America....
cpt.fass1 wrote:
Where it's wrong what he did, he shouldn't be tried as an adult as he's only 17.
Problem with our legal system, they just want to throw people in jail. Also they should IP who looked at the picture and arrest anyone who's over 18 as view child porn..
LOL... Jimmy Carr is hilarious...
Our Puritanical heritage still rears its ugly head from time to time...
lol... Well, we do get scrutinized more because of our position in the world, and a lot of the world has fucked up sex laws as you said, but I do believe we take it to another level....Ticia wrote:
Nah, don't you know? Happens all around but you're the city upon a hillTurquoise wrote:
Yet another example of our fucked up sex laws... only in America....
Our Puritanical heritage still rears its ugly head from time to time...
Last edited by Turquoise (2010-03-06 12:41:18)
wut if their IP addresses cant be traced and if the person used someone else's PC to view the picscpt.fass1 wrote:
Where it's wrong what he did, he shouldn't be tried as an adult as he's only 17.
Problem with our legal system, they just want to throw people in jail. Also they should IP who looked at the picture and arrest anyone who's over 18 as view child porn..
Pretty much... I think fass nailed it when he just said "they just want to throw people in jail."blademaster wrote:
wut if their IP addresses cant be traced and if the person used someone else's PC to view the picscpt.fass1 wrote:
Where it's wrong what he did, he shouldn't be tried as an adult as he's only 17.
Problem with our legal system, they just want to throw people in jail. Also they should IP who looked at the picture and arrest anyone who's over 18 as view child porn..
One thing I love about US History textbooks: THEY ESCAPE FROM TEH EVIL RELIGIOUS PERSECUTING OPPRESSIVE ENGLISH AND BECAME FREE.Turquoise wrote:
LOL... Jimmy Carr is hilarious...lol... Well, we do get scrutinized more because of our position in the world, and a lot of the world has fucked up sex laws as you said, but I do believe we take it to another level....Ticia wrote:
Nah, don't you know? Happens all around but you're the city upon a hillTurquoise wrote:
Yet another example of our fucked up sex laws... only in America....
Our Puritanical heritage still rears its ugly head from time to time...
Sidenote: They persecuted people who are not puritans lol.
True, but we cover that too. Puritans aren't exactly painted in a positive light in our history courses (at least, not in the ones I attended).Cybargs wrote:
One thing I love about US History textbooks: THEY ESCAPE FROM TEH EVIL RELIGIOUS PERSECUTING OPPRESSIVE ENGLISH AND BECAME FREE.Turquoise wrote:
LOL... Jimmy Carr is hilarious...lol... Well, we do get scrutinized more because of our position in the world, and a lot of the world has fucked up sex laws as you said, but I do believe we take it to another level....Ticia wrote:
Nah, don't you know? Happens all around but you're the city upon a hill
Our Puritanical heritage still rears its ugly head from time to time...
Sidenote: They persecuted people who are not puritans lol.
The only people our textbooks tend to glorify are the Founding Fathers, Abraham Lincoln, and MLK. Granted, I can't really find much negative about MLK anyway. He seemed like a pretty cool guy.
boobs
bad enough, but then how would you feel about that same teenage boy sending those pics to the world?Cybargs wrote:
I'd be mad at my daughter for doing dumb shit like sending naked pics to a teenage boy.ruisleipa wrote:
No, I wouldn't.lowing wrote:
you must not have a daughter. If you did, you would feel differently
Being mad is justified, but charging a minor the same way you would charge a 40 year old with pics of naked minors is just ridiculous.lowing wrote:
bad enough, but then how would you feel about that same teenage boy sending those pics to the world?Cybargs wrote:
I'd be mad at my daughter for doing dumb shit like sending naked pics to a teenage boy.ruisleipa wrote:
No, I wouldn't.
pissed off but not so pissed I'd want him being gang raped in prison for 12 years.lowing wrote:
bad enough, but then how would you feel about that same teenage boy sending those pics to the world?
Sorry, he was remorseful and non-compliant when asked to remove them. he was given a chance to do the right thing and refused. Fuck himTurquoise wrote:
Being mad is justified, but charging a minor the same way you would charge a 40 year old with pics of naked minors is just ridiculous.lowing wrote:
bad enough, but then how would you feel about that same teenage boy sending those pics to the world?Cybargs wrote:
I'd be mad at my daughter for doing dumb shit like sending naked pics to a teenage boy.
see aboveruisleipa wrote:
pissed off but not so pissed I'd want him being gang raped in prison for 12 years.lowing wrote:
bad enough, but then how would you feel about that same teenage boy sending those pics to the world?
?lowing wrote:
see above