I'm pretty sure we had color in the 70's and 80's. He said old, but not that old.DefCon-17 wrote:
http://www.videocopilot.net/tutorials/old_film_look/
verified.OmniDeath wrote:
I'm pretty sure we had color in the 70's and 80's.
Last edited by Catbox (2010-03-08 18:15:58)
When using Premier, when you export the video, somewhere in the export settings (maybe advanced settings), you can choose the framerate you want it in. It's advisable that if you're planning on exporting in 30fps, you record in 30fps. What kind of camera are you using? Most cheap handhelds that you take on vacation with your family will film in shitty 30fps.destruktion_6143 wrote:
Ok so would photoshop be able to change the FPS of a digital video?
Yea, I'm not sure what mtb is on about with changing the frame rate to achieve a retro look, but he was getting at Hollywood films being 24fps.tazz. wrote:
changin the fps aint gonna make it retro... what the shit are you guys talkin about... o.o
SauceArticle wrote:
Motion blur is the main reason why movies can be shown at 24 fps, therefore saving Hollywood money by not having to make the film any longer than possible (30 fps for a full feature film would be approximately 20% longer than a film shown at 24 fps, that turns out to be a lot of money).
Last edited by OmniDeath (2010-03-09 14:28:59)
Did you even read the quote in my post? It saves time and money, it has nothing to do with what people are capable of seeing.tazz. wrote:
24/30
What the eye can't see, who gives a shit
I dont see how a higher fps would decrease quality. I think that has more to do with the resolution, bitrate and colour recording in it...mtb0minime wrote:
Have you guys never seen home movies made on a crappy camcorder that record in 30fps compared to anything remotely decent that used 24fps?
