That was a guy who was 18 fucking like a 16 year old at the time. He was black, she was white, and her parents were pissed (and racist).blademaster wrote:
yeah there was a guy in Georgia who was charged he got like 15 years in prison while him and his gf were getting it on, so the cops found and then it was reported as rape... so he still serving time in jail....
shit brothas just can't get a breakblademaster wrote:
It's been more than a year since Dixon, now 19, was accused of raping a 15-year-old classmate in a trailer at Peppcrell High School in Rome, Ga. Dixon, who had a 3.96 grade point average, has maintained the sex was consensual. His accuser says it was not.
Related Results
A jury acquitted Dixon of rape, aggravated assault, false imprisonment and sexual battery. However, he was convicted of misdemeanor statutory rape and aggravated child molestation, which carries a minimum sentence of 10 years in prison without parole under Georgia's Child Protection Act.
According to the statute, anyone who has sex with someone under the age of 16 could be charged with statutory rape. However, the statute also states that, "if the victim is 14 or 15 years of age and the person so convicted is no more than three years older than the victim, such person, in the discretion of the court, be punished as for a misdemeanor."
In this case, Dixon and the accuser were 2 years and 7 months apart. If Dixon had only been convicted of misdemeanor statutory rape, then he would have had to serve one year in prison instead of the mandatory 10 for aggravated child molestation.
source
How does that make my argument 'an untruth'?lowing wrote:
As I said before look it up, 16 year olds are routinely being charged as adults. Pretty much making your argument an untruth.
Yeah you will get an extra ticket. Nothing more, give it a shot............PLEASE
In most causes people make long ass post and just repeat already agreed upon facts or the entire retort can be summed up in a short paragraph rather than having to cut up someone post. When I have to argue something point by point, I just use the highlight feature.BTW next time you wanna quote a long-ass post just quote the first line or something so you don't fill up our screens with repeats of the same thing yeah?
Look asshole, I didn't say he should be charged as an adult because he can drive. I said society views 16 as a responsible age and one indicator of this is society issues drivers licenses at 16. Society feels a person is mature enough to make right and wrong decisions at this age.ruisleipa wrote:
How does that make my argument 'an untruth'?lowing wrote:
As I said before look it up, 16 year olds are routinely being charged as adults. Pretty much making your argument an untruth.
Yeah you will get an extra ticket. Nothing more, give it a shot............PLEASE
you're so unable to see your own inconsistencies. You sau anyone at 16 should be charged as an adult, partly since they can drive.
people can drive different vehicles at different ages in different ages, which pretty much makes YOUR argument bullshit.
The girl was 16. She sent pics of her own free will. Ergo she is partly responsible for distributing 'child porn'.
But hang on, she was 16 - so she's responsible as an adult.
Which means...it WASN'T child porn? It was adult porn yeah?
BTW next time you wanna quote a long-ass post just quote the first line or something so you don't fill up our screens with repeats of the same thing yeah?
There's a legit argument against it? theres no bluddy argument for it.lowing wrote:
. You are right There is a legit argument against child pornography.
Remind you of anyone? have you never made a mistake lowing? you make this lad sound like the Devil for fuck sake.lowing wrote:
. I don't care what they do to him. He is still an asshole with no regard for another .
It really doesn't suprise me that Americas justice system is such a joke with people who think like you in charge.lowing wrote:
.For this he should be held responsible and accountable .
A matter of opinion and for the courts.LostFate wrote:
There's a legit argument against it? theres no bluddy argument for it.lowing wrote:
. You are right There is a legit argument against child pornography.Remind you of anyone? have you never made a mistake lowing? you make this lad sound like the Devil for fuck sake.lowing wrote:
. I don't care what they do to him. He is still an asshole with no regard for another .It really doesn't suprise me that Americas justice system is such a joke with people who think like you in charge.lowing wrote:
.For this he should be held responsible and accountable .
Fucking Republicains.
http://ilovepwnage.com/video.php?v=NDQ0NA==
Check that out , What a joke. Land of the free pfft if you say so.
Last edited by lowing (2010-03-12 06:03:12)
Couples make sex tapes, calendars, pics, for each other all the time, this does not give them the right to post them on the internet. Plenty of law suits out there that backs that up.Stubbee wrote:
The pics were given to him as a gift therefore he can do what he wants with them. Imagine receiving child porn as a gift *shakes head.
I don't understand why you keep painting her as a victim. As soon as she sent those pictures via internet/phone lines, she gave up any right to privacy.
He actually did her a favor by showing her parents the kind of daughter they have raised and thus allow them the opportunity to address her problems before she descends into pole dancing and XXX.
Lowing will never believe you.Stubbee wrote:
The pics were given to him as a gift therefore he can do what he wants with them. (H)
I don't understand why you keep painting her as a victim . As soon as she sent those pictures via internet/phone lines, she gave up any right to privacy .
Last edited by LostFate (2010-03-12 06:11:00)
I did forget to add. Yes, she is a victim of this guys malicious effort to cause her harm and embarrassment.LostFate wrote:
Lowing will never believe you.Stubbee wrote:
The pics were given to him as a gift therefore he can do what he wants with them. (H)
I don't understand why you keep painting her as a victim . As soon as she sent those pictures via internet/phone lines, she gave up any right to privacy .
ETA on lowings, shes the victim fuck him for this attack on her trust , i dont give a fuck about this arsehole responce.
WOW, that was even faster than it took me to type this.
Noo she's a victim of her stupidity of sending nudes to someone.lowing wrote:
I did forget to add. Yes, she is a victim of this guys malicious effort to cause her harm and embarrassment.LostFate wrote:
Lowing will never believe you.Stubbee wrote:
The pics were given to him as a gift therefore he can do what he wants with them. (H)
I don't understand why you keep painting her as a victim . As soon as she sent those pictures via internet/phone lines, she gave up any right to privacy .
ETA on lowings, shes the victim fuck him for this attack on her trust , i dont give a fuck about this arsehole responce.
WOW, that was even faster than it took me to type this.
yeah I would of waited till she turned 18 then fucked the shit out of her.... or just if u know someone who is under age just move on to some other girl (who is of legal age) then wait 2 years or a year or so till she turns 18 then show her wut she has been missing lolcpt.fass1 wrote:
Noo she's a victim of her stupidity of sending nudes to someone.lowing wrote:
I did forget to add. Yes, she is a victim of this guys malicious effort to cause her harm and embarrassment.LostFate wrote:
Lowing will never believe you.
ETA on lowings, shes the victim fuck him for this attack on her trust , i dont give a fuck about this arsehole responce.
WOW, that was even faster than it took me to type this.
Bottom line is I don't think this guy should get 12 years or anytime in prison. Why? Cause we have to pay for that. She learned a valuable lesson that if she doesn't want people to see something she should send it.
I see, so you think if you send something to someone over the internet that it automatically becomes their property to do with as they see fit, including harm you.cpt.fass1 wrote:
Noo she's a victim of her stupidity of sending nudes to someone.lowing wrote:
I did forget to add. Yes, she is a victim of this guys malicious effort to cause her harm and embarrassment.LostFate wrote:
Lowing will never believe you.
ETA on lowings, shes the victim fuck him for this attack on her trust , i dont give a fuck about this arsehole responce.
WOW, that was even faster than it took me to type this.
Bottom line is I don't think this guy should get 12 years or anytime in prison. Why? Cause we have to pay for that. She learned a valuable lesson that if she doesn't want people to see something she should send it.
Sorry, the malicious harm you bring to others should have consequences beyond emptying trash at the park.cpt.fass1 wrote:
Umm yeah possession is 9/10ths of the law. It sucks that it happened but I don't want my dollar support this child in the prison system and it's a problem with our legal system.
He should get community service but not jail time. Also Parents need to take responsibility for their children, if I ever end up with a child I'm going to give them a cell phone and you'd best bet that I'm going to look at that shit at least once a week. If they want to pay for their own service they'll have the right to privacy. But then if something like this happens, I'd probably beat the crap out of the kid and leave it at that.
nice insult. Driving a car has fuck all to do with being an indicator of responsibility in society. It just means you are physically able to drive a car and able to understand road signs. wtf does this have to do with child porn? NO-ONE even if they are ten years old would think it right to drive over someone. Driving has in general fuck all to do with criminal or other responsibility. Your driving analogy sucks. You don't seem to understand that your analogy weakens your dumb position on this issue.lowing wrote:
Look asshole, I didn't say he should be charged as an adult because he can drive. I said society views 16 as a responsible age and one indicator of this is society issues drivers licenses at 16. Society feels a person is mature enough to make right and wrong decisions at this age.
It does - unless it was sent with terms and conditions.lowing wrote:
I see, so you think if you send something to someone over the internet that it automatically becomes their property to do with as they see fit, including harm you.
Bollocks. The opposite is true. Which is why you find so many sex tapes of celebrities being sold without their consent by big companies. Show me some of these lawsuits to back your crazy claims up - it's not illegal to publish pictures or video of other people that you have been given. The only reason there is any legal case here is the girls age.lowing wrote:
Couples make sex tapes, calendars, pics, for each other all the time, this does not give them the right to post them on the internet. Plenty of law suits out there that backs that up.
Last edited by Bertster7 (2010-03-13 04:21:01)
I am not using it as an analogy. I said society views 16 as a responisible age, and I gave an example as to how. Of course you are going to tell me there is no responsiibilty whatsoever in getting behind a the wheel of a car. Fine, you can think whatever dumb fuck thing you choose. It does not mean you are right in doing so.ruisleipa wrote:
nice insult. Driving a car has fuck all to do with being an indicator of responsibility in society. It just means you are physically able to drive a car and able to understand road signs. wtf does this have to do with child porn? NO-ONE even if they are ten years old would think it right to drive over someone. Driving has in general fuck all to do with criminal or other responsibility. Your driving analogy sucks. You don't seem to understand that your analogy weakens your dumb position on this issue.lowing wrote:
Look asshole, I didn't say he should be charged as an adult because he can drive. I said society views 16 as a responsible age and one indicator of this is society issues drivers licenses at 16. Society feels a person is mature enough to make right and wrong decisions at this age.
http://www.inentertainment.co.uk/200907 … ideo-tape/Bertster7 wrote:
It does - unless it was sent with terms and conditions.lowing wrote:
I see, so you think if you send something to someone over the internet that it automatically becomes their property to do with as they see fit, including harm you.
If you give someone something it becomes theirs.Bollocks. The opposite is true. Which is why you find so many sex tapes of celebrities being sold without their consent by big companies. Show me some of these lawsuits to back your crazy claims up - it's not illegal to publish pictures or video of other people that you have been given. The only reason there is any legal case here is the girls age.lowing wrote:
Couples make sex tapes, calendars, pics, for each other all the time, this does not give them the right to post them on the internet. Plenty of law suits out there that backs that up.
goddamn read my posts. society views ages LESS than 16 as responsible. the age when you can drive a car is ONLY relevant to driving a car and fuck all else.lowing wrote:
I am not using it as an analogy. I said society views 16 as a responisible age, and I gave an example as to how. Of course you are going to tell me there is no responsiibilty whatsoever in getting behind a the wheel of a car. Fine, you can think whatever dumb fuck thing you choose. It does not mean you are right in doing so.
Also as said before, there is plenty of examples where 16 year olds are tried as adults. Again, tough shit if you disagree.
You fuckin said it.Fine, you can think whatever dumb fuck thing you choose. It does not mean you are right in doing so.
Pretty much nothing as a teenager exemplifies ADULT responsibility than that required to drive a car, putting others lives in your hands at the age of 16 is not comparable to anything else you can dream up as "responsible" at that age.ruisleipa wrote:
goddamn read my posts. society views ages LESS than 16 as responsible. the age when you can drive a car is ONLY relevant to driving a car and fuck all else.lowing wrote:
I am not using it as an analogy. I said society views 16 as a responisible age, and I gave an example as to how. Of course you are going to tell me there is no responsiibilty whatsoever in getting behind a the wheel of a car. Fine, you can think whatever dumb fuck thing you choose. It does not mean you are right in doing so.
Also as said before, there is plenty of examples where 16 year olds are tried as adults. Again, tough shit if you disagree.You fuckin said it.Fine, you can think whatever dumb fuck thing you choose. It does not mean you are right in doing so.