He'd get a ton of pussy though.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
Most Americans aren't on Welfare. You would be a funny talking ignorant poor immigrant. You' would be less than a Mexican. At least they try toi make it.I'm Jamesey wrote:
Then I'd fit in with a pretty large amount of americansMarlo Stanfield wrote:
Jamesey wouldn't survive in America. He's get shot trying to rob someone because they cut his welfare benefits.
13/f/taiwan wrote:
/facedesk
I'm a student. I'm not on welfare, any money I receive has to be paid back.Marlo Stanfield wrote:
Most Americans aren't on Welfare. You would be a funny talking ignorant poor immigrant. You' would be less than a Mexican. At least they try toi make it.I'm Jamesey wrote:
Then I'd fit in with a pretty large amount of americansMarlo Stanfield wrote:
Jamesey wouldn't survive in America. He's get shot trying to rob someone because they cut his welfare benefits.
a) how the fuck can you describe a crime of passion? almost anything could be a crime of passion if you get worked up enough about it. fuckin stupid.JohnG@lt wrote:
Crime of passion Also, you're allowed to shoot trespassers, so if he owned the place he'd be within his rights.
b) if my wife invites someone into my home he's not a fuckin trespasser althgouh I might wanna shoot him I can't...not for that reason.
lolmkxiii wrote:
marine who is fighting for it??
L.M.F.A.O.JohnG@lt wrote:
Dismembering is over the line, yeah.
Last edited by ruisleipa (2010-03-15 06:24:50)
I'm pretty sure walking in on your wife fucking another guy let alone two other guys is gonna get you alot more worked up than "almost anything".ruisleipa wrote:
a) how the fuck can you describe a crime of passion? almost anything could be a crime of passion if you get worked up enough about it. fuckin stupid.JohnG@lt wrote:
Crime of passion Also, you're allowed to shoot trespassers, so if he owned the place he'd be within his rights.
b) if my wife invites someone into my home he's not a fuckin trespasser althgouh I might wanna shoot him I can't...not for that reason.
fuck yeah, but also...it really fuckin pisses me off when people cut in front of me when I'm queueing for my doughnuts so I shot the bitch...Adams_BJ wrote:
I'm pretty sure walking in on your wife fucking another guy let alone two other guys is gonna get you alot more worked up than "almost anything".
...what? I love my fuckin Doughnuts bra!
see?
no. if i go home tonight, and my wifes in bed with two dudes, game over.ruisleipa wrote:
fuck yeah, but also...it really fuckin pisses me off when people cut in front of me when I'm queueing for my doughnuts so I shot the bitch...Adams_BJ wrote:
I'm pretty sure walking in on your wife fucking another guy let alone two other guys is gonna get you alot more worked up than "almost anything".
...what? I love my fuckin Doughnuts bra!
see?
Yeah but you are just cranky then. Walking in on your significant other betraying you in such a way will throw you into a jealous rage, which is a completely different part of the brain, figuratively speaking.ruisleipa wrote:
fuck yeah, but also...it really fuckin pisses me off when people cut in front of me when I'm queueing for my doughnuts so I shot the bitch...Adams_BJ wrote:
I'm pretty sure walking in on your wife fucking another guy let alone two other guys is gonna get you alot more worked up than "almost anything".
...what? I love my fuckin Doughnuts bra!
see?
AgreedJohnG@lt wrote:
Your argument is a complete failure. You're nitpicking stupid details and ignoring the big picture of the situation. If I wanted a gun in a country where it's illegal I can get one. All your gun ban has done is remove guns from the hands of people who obey the law, not those who ignore it.I'm Jamesey wrote:
Oh, so now it only levels the playing field if she not only has a gun, but participates in 50 years of target practice, otherwise we're back to square one.
..
so the inherent purpose of guns is for people to spend 50 years of their valuable time practising in the chance that somebody who is 6 foot 3 with military training tries to rob them
I understand!
And above your tomb, the stars will belong to us.
Personally, I'd claim I thought she was being raped.
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
Adams_BJ wrote:
Yeah but you are just cranky then. Walking in on your significant other betraying you in such a way will throw you into a jealous rage, which is a completely different part of the brain, figuratively speaking.
What if someone had spent all their life collecting vintage Star Wars figures wotrth undreds of thousands of dollars and came home to find me shitting on them before I burnt them? I mean, I can imagine someone flipping out over that but we'd say he wouldn't be justified in killing me cos of it. So I'm saying that if we say it's ok to do that in the OP case then it's just a totally arbitrary judgement, since people CAN be passionate about just about anything.burnzz wrote:
no. if i go home tonight, and my wifes in bed with two dudes, game over.
yeah ok my example of doughnuts was flippant, but still...how would a crime of passion be defined? I still don't think it would/should allow you to get completely off with murder, although it might mitigate your sentence somewhat.
and you shot her as well to spare her the shame.ROGUEDD wrote:
Personally, I'd claim I thought she was being raped.
oh the humanity!
What the two guys and the whore did was wrong and is what we call "frowned upon" but not illegal
the guy that killed all three of them, yeh thats illegal, he loses, crime of passion wat bullshit is this
the guy that killed all three of them, yeh thats illegal, he loses, crime of passion wat bullshit is this
HER apartment. He walked into HER apartment.
Not married, not engaged, no kids together. Just another guy assuming he can control who a woman sees and what she does. 25 to life. Bye bye.
EDIT seems there is some doubt as to the validity of the story. As someone posted at The Post: show me the bodies!
Not married, not engaged, no kids together. Just another guy assuming he can control who a woman sees and what she does. 25 to life. Bye bye.
EDIT seems there is some doubt as to the validity of the story. As someone posted at The Post: show me the bodies!
Last edited by Stubbee (2010-03-15 06:59:29)
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
kerching!Stubbee wrote:
HER apartment. He walked into HER apartment.
Not married, not engaged, no kids together. Just another guy assuming he can control who a woman sees and what she does. 25 to life. Bye bye.
you win.
if you did that that'd be your fuckin problem so have a nice time in jail/death row.burnzz wrote:
i wouldn't care about mitigating circumstances, or even getting away with murder. if i found my wife of sixteen years, in bed with two other guys, i would chamber a round and shoot her first. and then the other two. then i would pick up the phone dial 911 and set it down without hanging up. i would eject the clip, put the clip and gun on the floor, pour two fingers of my oldest scotch and wait for the cops.
i am not going to argue with you on this one - this ain't DAST, and you keep creating these wild scenarios. i answered the OP, and if you want to go off on a tangent, make your own thread. preferably in DAST.
I think stubbee pretty much summed up this one anyway. Anyway christ's sake why do you get all forum nazi all the time? I'm just fuckin posting some ideas man. I answered the OP too if you bothered reading it. you say you're not gonna bother arguing like your word is final. fuck that. you obviously DO argue cos you keep replying. Couldn't care less if you agree or not.Stubbee wrote:
HER apartment. He walked into HER apartment.
Not married, not engaged, no kids together. Just another guy assuming he can control who a woman sees and what she does. 25 to life. Bye bye.
anyway what's to talk about if not whether he was right or wrong to do it (Assuminbg the story is real)? Or would you like to bitch about some people mentioning gun control earlier in the thread as well?
Last edited by ruisleipa (2010-03-15 07:03:48)
i deleted my post. "why do you get all forum nazi all the time" that's rich coming from you, but whateva.ruisleipa wrote:
blah blah blah
Collateral damage tbh. shotguns tend to have a wide spreadruisleipa wrote:
and you shot her as well to spare her the shame.ROGUEDD wrote:
Personally, I'd claim I thought she was being raped.
oh the humanity!
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
Burnzz doesn't have the fashion sense to be a nazi.
ROGUEDD wrote:
Collateral damage tbh. shotguns tend to have a wide spreadruisleipa wrote:
and you shot her as well to spare her the shame.ROGUEDD wrote:
Personally, I'd claim I thought she was being raped.
oh the humanity!
?
fail pic is fail, though I don't see what this has to do with .50 sniper rifles.ruisleipa wrote:
http://www.militarypictures.info/d/80-3/Barret_M82.jpgROGUEDD wrote:
Collateral damage tbh. shotguns tend to have a wide spreadruisleipa wrote:
and you shot her as well to spare her the shame.
oh the humanity!
?
* You may post 2 seconds ago
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
moral of the story: don't date whores
well I can see it. maybe your internet connection is failROGUEDD wrote:
fail pic is fail, though I don't see what this has to do with .50 sniper rifles.
if you want precision don't use a fuckin shotgunROGUEDD wrote:
Collateral damage tbh. shotguns tend to have a wide spread
remove the possibility of collateral damage
slow day?
Either ruis didn't know the differance between a sniper rifle and a shotgun and is now backtracking or he is suggesting you use a sniper rifle in CQC.
Amazing
Amazing