does not computeDilbert_X wrote:
butt-naked in a mini-dress.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
OK - no underwear - wearing a mini-dress.
I guess I got fixated on the butt-nakedness....
I guess I got fixated on the butt-nakedness....
Fuck Israel
Perfectly understandable.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
Nuh Im the opposite, I reckon a girl covering her flange up is more sexy, you have to imagine how it looks, tastes, smells and feels yourself. I know you only get the 'look' sence through a picture but I do think bitches are sexier when they dont have all their guts hanging out on show, flapping in the wind.Dilbert_X wrote:
OT: Prefer them with no underwear, just butt-naked in a mini-dress.
secondedCanin wrote:
I don't think there is a straight guy anywhere that would be concerned with the quality of a VS item when he is removing it from his girl.
15 more years! 15 more years!
As Sisco said, I think La Perla is supposed to be really good.
Often its better to have cheaper, if your Mrs will let you rip them quite litterally off her then £2.99 on a pair of y-fronts aint so bad.Mitch wrote:
secondedCanin wrote:
I don't think there is a straight guy anywhere that would be concerned with the quality of a VS item when he is removing it from his girl.
And it also happens to be the name of this awesome tequila bar in London.ghettoperson wrote:
As Sisco said, I think La Perla is supposed to be really good.
Wife won't go near a Victoria's Secret;
"You want to know what the secret is? It's all ill-fitting, over-hyped, cheap Chinese made junk. All of their money goes into advertising and models, none of it into making a decent bra that fits worth a damn"
The reference dimensions they use come from females of the Chinese and Supermodel persuasion (apparently). Neither of which bear any resemblance to the curvature of a fit American, Canadian, or European woman.
Edit: guy's clothes are easy - just a bunch of straight lines. Women's clothes are difficult - all intersecting complex curves.
"You want to know what the secret is? It's all ill-fitting, over-hyped, cheap Chinese made junk. All of their money goes into advertising and models, none of it into making a decent bra that fits worth a damn"
The reference dimensions they use come from females of the Chinese and Supermodel persuasion (apparently). Neither of which bear any resemblance to the curvature of a fit American, Canadian, or European woman.
Edit: guy's clothes are easy - just a bunch of straight lines. Women's clothes are difficult - all intersecting complex curves.
Last edited by rdx-fx (2010-03-30 10:06:15)
this1927 wrote:
Nuh Im the opposite, I reckon a girl covering her flange up is more sexy, you have to imagine how it looks, tastes, smells and feels yourself. I know you only get the 'look' sence through a picture but I do think bitches are sexier when they dont have all their guts hanging out on show, flapping in the wind.Dilbert_X wrote:
OT: Prefer them with no underwear, just butt-naked in a mini-dress.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
SERE, Zim - this thread is in desperate need of photographic comparison materials.
A Victoria's Secret thread and not a single woman pictured...
I am shocked BF2s
I am shocked BF2s
Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-03-30 14:34:47)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Thx finray, now I have to forget that...Finray wrote:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_swuVxjXq3Qs/R … +tired.gif
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
M.O.A.B to the rescue!
NO NO NO NO NO - What kind of fucking underpants do you call them woman? Half way up her back, no access to the crack, give the bitch a smack, and less of the yakkety yak.