AAFCptKabbom
Member
+127|7015|WPB, FL. USA
I guess I see things a lil' differently 

After reading all of the replies in this entire thread I kept seeing over and over lil' comments about
"Karma" and the gracious giving and taking away of points.  And in a true BF2 Gamer mindset it came to me that some lil' @#%*@%! noob will @#%&*#@! stat pad their "Karma" score by getting a bud to give them a "+1" everytime they post.  And in the true sense of the @#$%&*! asshat who punishes before thinking in an intense firefight - this same lil' @#$%*&@! will hit "-1 Karma" before appreciating that everyone is not as smart as they are and makes mistakes

Oh, as far as the topic - great thoughts on the subject.  I find it amusing that EA has conditioned us to be sceptical on what they decide we need or don't in BF2.  Whatever drugs they're taking - count me out

Kaboom.

Last edited by AAFCptKabbom (2006-04-26 09:38:17)

E7IX3R
is drunk and crazy
+216|7045|UK
Reading these posts, I've noticed a common thing:

"OMGs Humvees gonna stop Jets taking off LOLZ"

Now if anyone has ANY COMMON SENSE, they would simply move the humvee out the way of the jet, so the person can take off, and if noone else is about to do it, you get out of the jet and do it yourself.

Some people *sigh*
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7024

E7IX3R wrote:

Reading these posts, I've noticed a common thing:

"OMGs Humvees gonna stop Jets taking off LOLZ"

Now if anyone has ANY COMMON SENSE, they would simply move the humvee out the way of the jet, so the person can take off, and if noone else is about to do it, you get out of the jet and do it yourself.

Some people *sigh*
But while you're moving that Humvee, someone else will take the jet.  Everyone will still stand around the jet, hoping someone else will move the transport.  Of course you could always shoot the transport.

Last edited by Ilocano (2006-04-26 10:23:00)

Capt. Foley
Member
+155|6945|Allentown, PA, USA
ive found a way around that on wake island as china but i havent been lucky enough 2 find anything else
E7IX3R
is drunk and crazy
+216|7045|UK

Ilocano wrote:

E7IX3R wrote:

Reading these posts, I've noticed a common thing:

"OMGs Humvees gonna stop Jets taking off LOLZ"

Now if anyone has ANY COMMON SENSE, they would simply move the humvee out the way of the jet, so the person can take off, and if noone else is about to do it, you get out of the jet and do it yourself.

Some people *sigh*
But while you're moving that Humvee, someone else will take the jet.  Everyone will still stand around the jet, hoping someone else will move the transport.
Thats when you rise above the stupidity of the other players and sacrafice your beloved Jet
Nintendogamer
Member
+72|6944|Chelmsford, UK
I would like Parachutes, to be able to get caught on trees, buildings etc, could be really funny.
+IMP+ Neelzy
Member
+0|6953
vehicle dropping???
knowing EA thats gonna b glitchtastic
IBKCKNURASS
Corrosion Inhibitor
+172|7094
Thanx for the heads up Wiki patch info Updated.....
http://wiki.bf2s.com/other/patchhistory
I~Love~Mysti
Member
+23|6940
Some time in may, a week before armored fury is released.


Adjusted Award critera? They oughta make basic heli and plane badges five minutes instead of 15 for heli and 10 for plane. And commanders dropping vehicles? Oy. Find group of enemy infantry. Drop vehicle. Uber points. Just imagine...

InfertileWEASLE [Vodnik] I~Love~Mysti~
InfertileWEASLE [Vodnik] badboy119
InfertileWEASLE [Vodnik] Chuy


Gimme a break. Other than that, I'd like to see crash bugs and that sort of thing ironed out. And beef up the black hawks armor. It's way to weak. Maybe some splash damage on the black hawks chain guns? Cmon EA, lets get things right again. Oh yeah, and maybe beef up the damage on the AT rocket? Just a bit, don't make AT the new Sniper, though.

AND MAKE THE DAMNED CLAYMORE/AT MINE DESTRUCTABLE!!!! This way, when we see a claymore or an at mine, we can shoot it to get rid of it. It's VERY unrealistic, not to metion unbalanced to have indistructable mines.

Last edited by I~Love~Mysti (2006-04-26 13:50:37)

PvtchieF73
Member
+15|7066|Netherlands
lolololol
.:ronin:.|Patton
Respekct dad i love u always
+946|7166|Marathon, Florida Keys

+IMP+ Neelzy wrote:

vehicle dropping???
knowing EA thats gonna b glitchtastic
yea, like it dropps 100 vehicles on accedent, lowers the FPS rate on commander to 2, causing his computer to crash.

no squad hopping anymore wow, lets change something no one ever complained about!!
https://i54.photobucket.com/albums/g117/patton1337/stats.jpg
sixshot
Decepticon Geek
+50|7032|Planet Seibertron ;)
Welp, late commenting on this... but I'll post anyway...

Looks like a normal change list for the most part.  Keyword: most.

Adjustments on the awards criteria is too ambiguous and vague to really tell what's being changed here.  It'd be nice to know what awards are being adjusted anyway.  But on a related note, I do find the criteria for Expert Knife and Expert Pistol to be amusingly reversed.  Other things like the WCR seems like it could use a minor adjustment... but it's not really a big deal... at least at first.

The part that bugs me is their adjustment to Squad Leader Spawning.  I personally use this all the time.  Not only does it save time having to go from point A to strategic point B, but it also preps a squad up for a capture.  The squad leader is already at a disadvantage being the only spawn point in the area, since the point in question is controlled by the enemy (they can spawn in at any time regardless of squad).  They can come in either as a single man or as an entire army.  Being able to hop between squads makes effective use of resources where players are needed at critical locations in order to attack a location.  Changing this would mean you are giving those who have control of a control point an even bigger advantage than before.

I personally do not like this particular change and I hope it gets dropped.  Squad-hopping has advantages that enforces the idea and concept of perimeter defense.  It also enables the losing team a possible chance to infiltrate an undefended area, capture it, and gives that team a better chance in coming back.  EA ought to leave the squad-hopping alone... it's already bad enough that J-10 can effectively dodge jet missiles yet F-35B cannot.
Terrible_chester
PKM Whore
+16|6992|Prolly on wake.
Dear EA/DICE,


Red name bug fix please.

Thanks.
ckaplan
Member
+7|6954

Terrible_chester wrote:

Dear EA/DICE,


Red name bug fix please.

Thanks.
LOL!  Isn't that being fixed in 1.4.
Naughty_Om
Im Ron Burgundy?
+355|6990|USA
more like 1.9123908185918240912741082471093810293
Superslim
BF2s Frat Brother
+211|7049|Calgary
Hmmm. wonder if their going to fix the usless Backhawk guns
Souljah
Member
+42|7024
still no sign on them making it where you can jump then dive in SF . come on EA you did it for the regular bf2 now show us few SF players some love
Speelbal
Member
+146|7109|Netherlands
You're beginning to wonder which community EA/DICE is listening to.. Vehicle drop? Who proposed such an idea?
Roger Lesboules
Ah ben tabarnak!
+316|6934|Abitibi-Temiscamingue. Québec!
My opignons are that the vehicule dropping will screw up the whole things...AGAIN!

For the award retinkin...its ok...4500h geez that way too much

And the rest seem pretty nice...but god dam i hope they will fix the dam hotel roof glitch allowing you to get in the hotel and shooting out...thats the worst things for me right now.
k1LLr_M
Prone to Own
+118|6950|Houston, TX
Don't think vehicle dropping on carriers would be a problem and I can't understand why some people think so.
If they are already raping you that bad a single humvee wont help them that much, it succumbs to a single SRAW quickly...or just man the AA and shoot it out of the sky before it hits the ground.
subz3r0mkt
Member
+27|7034

k1LLr_M wrote:

Don't think vehicle dropping on carriers would be a problem and I can't understand why some people think so.
If they are already raping you that bad a single humvee wont help them that much, it succumbs to a single SRAW quickly...or just man the AA and shoot it out of the sky before it hits the ground.
Good point, also..

According to :

* Air dropped vehicles: Squad members can now send a request up the chain of command for A vehicle to be dropped at their location.

I hope there won't be too much of a problem with vehicles landing on top of buildings etc.  Example: a vehicle will fall off and land on the person that requested the drop, or fall off and explode, possibly killing team mates or the opposition.  Or say if it is dropped on top of a building, you still kinda of need a way to get inside it...maybe bailing from a heli. or plane..meh.  I'm sure there are creative ways of using this vehicle drop ability.  IMO, this new feature spells- disaster.  However, the rest of the fixes/changes seem reasonable.

Go Squad, Go!
=NwW= SgtD
Member
+16|6933|England basingstoke

Mike_J wrote:

i hope the fix about choppers that would continue to fly without anyone in it doesn't mean exactly what i think it means...maybe it means a fix for a chopper with absolutely noone in it.  this is gonna suck if i can't do my tvs pilotless anymore.  i really, really don't want to be forced to have pilots that can't fly now.  i can already tell i'm not going to be doing alot of gunning anymore...maaaaaan.
lol i agree dude
mcminty
Moderating your content for the Australian Govt.
+879|7078|Sydney, Australia

=Robin-Hood= wrote:

And an official link: http://www.ea.com/official/battlefield/ … ate_042506
Ah shit, that means that co-op thing and air drop vehicles are most likely real.


How about you include VoiP for the vehicle? Ya know EA, it's rather hard to type instructions while flying a helicpoter.




Other than that, the bug fixes are good.
xaven
Member
+25|7090|Berlin
what about a radio in the vehicles? imaginge, youre driving a tank and put on the player:

"This is BF-FM, my name is Howard Stern and you're listening to the most beautiful music an the battlefield. And now let's start with 'Feuer frei' by Rammstein"

but serious:

the AT bug (missiles flying through vehicles at a close distance) is still not fixed. and the movement... well, I dont want to whine
k1LLr_M
Prone to Own
+118|6950|Houston, TX

xaven wrote:

what about a radio in the vehicles? imaginge, youre driving a tank and put on the player:

"This is BF-FM, my name is Howard Stern and you're listening to the most beautiful music an the battlefield. And now let's start with 'Feuer frei' by Rammstein"
someone misses their BFV days

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard