blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|7052
1-7 = Free
8-30 = Mostly Free
31-88 = moderately free
89-143=  Mostly unfree
144-179= repressed

Here are some notable countries and their Economic Freedom ranking
#1 Hong Kong
#2 Singapore
#3 Australia
#4 New Zealand
#5 Ireland
#6 Switzerland
#7 Canada
#8 United States
#11 U.K.
#15 Netherlands
#17 Finland
#18 Iceland
#22 Austria
#30 Belgium
#34 Czech Republic
#44 Israel
#61 Slovenia
#92 Croatia
#124 India
#135 Argentina
#168 Iran
#177 Cuba
#179 N. Korea

link to the country ranking for trade, business
Shadow893
lel
+75|7099|England

blademaster wrote:

1-7 = Free
8-30 = Mostly Free
31-88 = moderately free
89-143=  Mostly unfree
144-179= repressed

Here are some notable countries and their Economic Freedom ranking
#1 Hong Kong
#2 Singapore
#3 Australia
#4 New Zealand
#5 Ireland
#6 Switzerland
#7 Canada
#8 United States
#11 U.K.
#15 Netherlands
#17 Finland
#18 Iceland
#22 Austria
#30 Belgium
#34 Czech Republic
#44 Israel
#61 Slovenia
#92 Croatia
#124 India
#135 Argentina
#168 Iran
#177 Cuba
#179 N. Korea

link to the country ranking for trade, business
Hong Kong is a country? : /

EDIT: wow so it is. lol didn't know that

Last edited by Shadow893 (2010-04-05 12:59:29)

AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6560|what

Shame about Zimbabwe.

I think limiting of trade often hurts the general population more than it does the Government.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|7052

Shadow893 wrote:

Hong Kong is a country? : /

EDIT: wow so it is. lol didn't know that
yeah I guess

"Under the principle of "one country, two systems", Hong Kong runs on economic and political systems different from those of mainland China."

""One country, two systems" is an idea originally proposed by Deng Xiaoping, then Paramount Leader of the People's Republic of China (PRC), for the reunification of China during the early 1980s. He suggested that there would be only one China, but areas such as Hong Kong, Macau  and Taiwan  could have their own capitalist economic and political systems, while the rest of China uses the "socialist" system. Under the suggestion, Taiwan could continue to have its own political system, legal, military, economic and financial affairs, including commercial and cultural agreements with foreign countries, and would enjoy "certain rights" in foreign affairs."

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/graphics/maps/newmaps/hk-map.gif

Last edited by blademaster (2010-04-05 13:03:08)

Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7074

LOL at Hong Kong and Singapore rankings.  Not "Individual" economic freedom...

Just an example:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/08/opini … wring.html

In Hong Kong, a handful of private groups operatedomestic monopolies or oligopolies in power, retailing and transport, all linked to a few major property development companies, which also own media and other major domestic enterprises. Foreigners who have tried to enter - as the French group Carrefour did into retailing - have been squeezed out by anti-competitive cartels. The government, meanwhile, in the name of being business-friendly, resists competition or anti-trust laws that might open up these markets.

In Singapore, it is the government itself that stands in the way of the unfettered private enterprise that the Heritage Foundation's criteria are supposed to favor. The major real estate, banking, transport, manufacturing and utility companies listed on the stock market are all government-controlled entities. They may be efficient, but is this an economy free of government intervention? The index also claims that "the market sets almost all wages." But actually "wages are based on annual recommendations made by the tripartite National Wages Council."

Last edited by Ilocano (2010-04-05 13:19:42)

ruisleipa
Member
+149|6629|teh FIN-land
definition of 'economic freedom'?
blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|7052
One major approach to economic freedom comes from the libertarian tradition emphasizing free markets and private property, while another extends the welfare economics study of individual choice, with greater economic freedom coming from a "larger" (in some technical sense) set of possible choices.  Another more philosophical perspective emphasizes its context in distributive justice and basic freedoms of all individuals.[4]

Today, the term is most commonly associated with a free market viewpoint, and defined as the freedom to produce, trade and consume any goods and services acquired without the use of force, fraud or theft. This is embodied in the rule of law, property rights and freedom of contract, and characterized by external and internal openness of the markets, the protection of property rights and freedom of economic initiative.

Indices of economic freedom attempt to measure (free market) economic freedom, and empirical studies based on these rankings have found them to be correlated with higher living standards, economic growth, income equality, less corruption and less political violence
Ilocano
buuuurrrrrrppppp.......
+341|7074

ruisleipa wrote:

definition of 'economic freedom'?
The ability of those economic powers already in place to do what they please.
ruisleipa
Member
+149|6629|teh FIN-land
thank you

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard