birds??
who's bragging about losing it, you dumb shits
it was part of a designed insult, not a central point in my critique of miley cyrus' clinical fugliness
you guys are fucking hopeless, honestly.
camm, you're stupid. end.
androoz, you follow people and will never have an opinion or scrap of intelligence that wasnt spoonfed to you, normally by other retards. end.
jens, you're a hapless tool that wears long-sleeve polos, suffers from chronic problems with self-confidence and posting pictures, and you reverence ugly-ass skanks. end.
it was part of a designed insult, not a central point in my critique of miley cyrus' clinical fugliness
you guys are fucking hopeless, honestly.
camm, you're stupid. end.
androoz, you follow people and will never have an opinion or scrap of intelligence that wasnt spoonfed to you, normally by other retards. end.
jens, you're a hapless tool that wears long-sleeve polos, suffers from chronic problems with self-confidence and posting pictures, and you reverence ugly-ass skanks. end.
Last edited by Uzique (2010-04-07 11:46:39)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
That sucks. Is the bank going to have a fire sale? Maybe you and the other tenants should buy it.baggs wrote:
so i get home to a letter today and our landlord appears to have defaulted on his mortgage payments.
fml.
You lose.Jenspm wrote:
wait, you just called yourself a virgin.Uzique wrote:
i havent a clue?
jens, out of the two of us, only one here is still a virgin
that one aint the dude giving average teenage bitches an unrealistically high pedestal
i hate to say this but:Uzique wrote:
who's bragging about losing it, you dumb shits
it was part of a designed insult, not a central point in my critique of miley cyrus' clinical fugliness
you guys are fucking hopeless, honestly.
camm, you're stupid. end.
androoz, you follow people and will never have an opinion or scrap of intelligence that wasnt spoonfed to you, normally be other retards. end.
jens, you're a hapless tool that wears long-sleeve polos, suffers from chronic problems with self-confidence and posting pictures, and you reverence ugly-ass skanks. end.
score 1 for Uzique.
yea for some reason it reeks of dulce gabbana in here.Uzique wrote:
who's bragging about losing it, you dumb shits
it was part of a designed insult, not a central point in my critique of miley cyrus' clinical fugliness
you guys are fucking hopeless, honestly.
camm, you're stupid. end.
androoz, you follow people and will never have an opinion or scrap of intelligence that wasnt spoonfed to you, normally be other retards. end.
jens, you're a hapless tool that wears long-sleeve polos, suffers from chronic problems with self-confidence and posting pictures, and you reverence ugly-ass skanks. end.
And you seem to think you're so much better than everyone else. And that makes you better than us how?Uzique wrote:
who's bragging about losing it, you dumb shits
it was part of a designed insult, not a central point in my critique of miley cyrus' clinical fugliness
you guys are fucking hopeless, honestly.
camm, you're stupid. end.
androoz, you follow people and will never have an opinion or scrap of intelligence that wasnt spoonfed to you, normally be other retards. end.
jens, you're a hapless tool that wears long-sleeve polos, suffers from chronic problems with self-confidence and posting pictures, and you reverence ugly-ass skanks. end.
I'm not the one shoveling gram after gram of coke up my nose, moaning about my life on an internet forum to anyone that doesn't give a fuck. You got banned, boo fucking hoo. We didn't need two threads on it.
Suck it up and move along.
DID YOU NOT SEE HE CALLED HIMSELF A VIRGING JESUS CHRIST YOU SUCK AT KEEPING SCORE.baggs wrote:
i hate to say this but:Uzique wrote:
who's bragging about losing it, you dumb shits
it was part of a designed insult, not a central point in my critique of miley cyrus' clinical fugliness
you guys are fucking hopeless, honestly.
camm, you're stupid. end.
androoz, you follow people and will never have an opinion or scrap of intelligence that wasnt spoonfed to you, normally be other retards. end.
jens, you're a hapless tool that wears long-sleeve polos, suffers from chronic problems with self-confidence and posting pictures, and you reverence ugly-ass skanks. end.
score 1 for Uzique.
1-1 after own goal
carry on.
man I havent got laid in forever
Tu Stultus Es
The Internet, and discussion Forums/Lobbies in particular, provide a breeding ground for a new strain of human being. With the cornucopia of information; the plethora of online resources, a novice Internet user can navigate his/her way to a page of authority and knowledge. By utilising this aforementioned information, a sapient transcendence of sorts occurs- and a 'pseudo-intellectual' is born.
The pseudo-intellectual is not an individual to be reckoned with. It must be understood that they hold the key to unsurpassable knowledge- or rather, the URL to Google's homepage. Only through the brilliant minds of people such as Jimmy Wales has this new character appeared in cyberspace. The pseudo-intellectuals' tome of knowledge is not the Bible, nor the Qur'an. Their 'book' of worship goes by the name of Wikipedia, and its word is law. On discussion Forums all over the Internet (and even on our own Xfire boards), individuals harness this intellectual goldmine and juxtapose it onto their own writings and opinions.
Indeed, their creed is that "What's good for the posture is good for the pose." 5 minutes of reading and brief scanning through a subject beforehand arms an eager Forum reader with a frame of mind that affords them a very confident and well-informed appearance. Yet, 99% of these Forum posters are deceiving. Harbouring a habit, and an approach to Forum posting that juxtaposes intellectualism; crossing the fine line between actually being an 'intellectual', and intellectual posturing.
For me personally, this intellectual posturing holds even more hilarity than the anti-intellectual views held by the egalitarians, right through to the old-fashioned British workers,- as it doesn't reject the idea of philosophical musing and academia- but instead it poorly imitates it.
Do not be fooled by these sheep in the costume of wolves. These 'authorities' on metaphysics, game theory, abstract algebra, socio-economics, politics, and the contemporary world that they live in are all, for the most part, shallow and unfounded. They may claim to understand and enjoy the writings of Marcuse, Foucalt and Adorno- or any other philosopher or celebrated thinking intellectual... but the vast majority of these individuals have a substance and founding extending no further than the webscript of the Wiki.
Enjoy the Forums: and remember that everyone holds great knowledge and intelligence. Or at least their Clipboard does.
i find it funny how most superior than thou people who call others psuedo intellectuals are actually psuedo intellectuals themselves.
The pseudo-intellectual is not an individual to be reckoned with. It must be understood that they hold the key to unsurpassable knowledge- or rather, the URL to Google's homepage. Only through the brilliant minds of people such as Jimmy Wales has this new character appeared in cyberspace. The pseudo-intellectuals' tome of knowledge is not the Bible, nor the Qur'an. Their 'book' of worship goes by the name of Wikipedia, and its word is law. On discussion Forums all over the Internet (and even on our own Xfire boards), individuals harness this intellectual goldmine and juxtapose it onto their own writings and opinions.
Indeed, their creed is that "What's good for the posture is good for the pose." 5 minutes of reading and brief scanning through a subject beforehand arms an eager Forum reader with a frame of mind that affords them a very confident and well-informed appearance. Yet, 99% of these Forum posters are deceiving. Harbouring a habit, and an approach to Forum posting that juxtaposes intellectualism; crossing the fine line between actually being an 'intellectual', and intellectual posturing.
For me personally, this intellectual posturing holds even more hilarity than the anti-intellectual views held by the egalitarians, right through to the old-fashioned British workers,- as it doesn't reject the idea of philosophical musing and academia- but instead it poorly imitates it.
Do not be fooled by these sheep in the costume of wolves. These 'authorities' on metaphysics, game theory, abstract algebra, socio-economics, politics, and the contemporary world that they live in are all, for the most part, shallow and unfounded. They may claim to understand and enjoy the writings of Marcuse, Foucalt and Adorno- or any other philosopher or celebrated thinking intellectual... but the vast majority of these individuals have a substance and founding extending no further than the webscript of the Wiki.
Enjoy the Forums: and remember that everyone holds great knowledge and intelligence. Or at least their Clipboard does.
i find it funny how most superior than thou people who call others psuedo intellectuals are actually psuedo intellectuals themselves.
come on uzique pick on someone your own size
dulce gabbana? the fuck am i, fergie with dyslexia?
gram after gram of coke up my nose? oh dear, oh dear oh dear...
and i am better than you, in every comparative way. quantitively and qualitatively. try me, camm!
lol, androoz you copypasta something i wrote like... 4 years ago? when i was your age? before i even came to the bf2s forums (it was about another internet community, basically D&ST on steroids, full of wiki-heroes and google-pundits), and it still reads better than anything you could EVER write. shooting yourself in the foot on the intellectual ticket, you dumb cunt.
gram after gram of coke up my nose? oh dear, oh dear oh dear...
and i am better than you, in every comparative way. quantitively and qualitatively. try me, camm!
lol, androoz you copypasta something i wrote like... 4 years ago? when i was your age? before i even came to the bf2s forums (it was about another internet community, basically D&ST on steroids, full of wiki-heroes and google-pundits), and it still reads better than anything you could EVER write. shooting yourself in the foot on the intellectual ticket, you dumb cunt.
Last edited by Uzique (2010-04-07 11:51:25)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
well two things are for sure, either we get evicted by bailiffs OR the landlords mortgage provider undertake the rental of the property and we pay them direct. I hope it's the latter, i love where i live.13/f/taiwan wrote:
That sucks. Is the bank going to have a fire sale? Maybe you and the other tenants should buy it.baggs wrote:
so i get home to a letter today and our landlord appears to have defaulted on his mortgage payments.
fml.
perhaps tho, like you said, we might be able to undertake the remaining mortgage, downside is tho, i know the apartment is worth about 220k on the current market and i doubt Antonia and i would be able to get a mortgage for even two thirds of that
I giggledUzique wrote:
dulce gabbana? the fuck am i, fergie with dyslexia?
well you seem to think telling me about your habitual coke use makes you cool.Uzique wrote:
dulce gabbana? the fuck am i, fergie with dyslexia?
gram after gram of coke up my nose? oh dear, oh dear oh dear...
and i am better than you, in every comparative way. quantitively and qualitatively. try me, camm!
And no. You're not.
lol whats funny is you joke about it but you actually do think youre better than every1 else.Uzique wrote:
dulce gabbana? the fuck am i, fergie with dyslexia?
gram after gram of coke up my nose? oh dear, oh dear oh dear...
and i am better than you, in every comparative way. quantitively and qualitatively. try me, camm!
ya sure youre pretty damn smart and in with most stuff but that doesnt mean you gotta be a d*ck to every1 else.
ha ha!
FUCKING TWO NIL! GIBSON AND NANI!
FUCKING TWO NIL! GIBSON AND NANI!
watched that yesterday, Kamara is such a legendbennisboy wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uoO-05gqWc
"I thought it was a sub"
camm: fuck off. you are a prime cunt. i would shank you without a second thought.Uzique wrote:
lol, androoz you copypasta something i wrote like... 4 years ago? when i was your age? before i even came to the bf2s forums (it was about another internet community, basically D&ST on steroids, full of wiki-heroes and google-pundits), and it still reads better than anything you could EVER write. shooting yourself in the foot on the intellectual ticket, you dumb cunt.
telling you about it to "be cool"? i was speaking openly and frankly about it mid-way through a conversation - no brag - and was speaking against it. telling you it wasnt worth getting into. i believe you cited money-reasons as to why you wouldnt do it regularly yourself. so the fuck are you talking about? wanker. get a real impetus to talk shit.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
oi its a repost! karma me. now!!mkxiii wrote:
watched that yesterday, Kamara is such a legendbennisboy wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uoO-05gqWc
"I thought it was a sub"
I'll pay to see Uzique shank Camm, i'll even provide the tool.
as if uzique could shank anybody
Halfway through he'd probably have an existential breakdown and end up shanking himself.
Halfway through he'd probably have an existential breakdown and end up shanking himself.
its the whole "yaa bro, ive had my fair share of drug use but i dont recommend that you do it" attitude
I thought you two had a blasty blast in bfbc2
Oh sad day.
Oh sad day.
A real impetus? As opposed to being a walking superiority complex?Uzique wrote:
camm: fuck off. you are a prime cunt. i would shank you without a second thought.Uzique wrote:
lol, androoz you copypasta something i wrote like... 4 years ago? when i was your age? before i even came to the bf2s forums (it was about another internet community, basically D&ST on steroids, full of wiki-heroes and google-pundits), and it still reads better than anything you could EVER write. shooting yourself in the foot on the intellectual ticket, you dumb cunt.
telling you about it to "be cool"? i was speaking openly and frankly about it mid-way through a conversation - no brag - and was speaking against it. telling you it wasnt worth getting into. i believe you cited money-reasons as to why you wouldnt do it regularly yourself. so the fuck are you talking about? wanker. get a real impetus to talk shit.