In BC1 the lower it was the better. In BC1 i had a skill level of 2 most of the time. I played like a freak.
In BC2 it seems like the higher the better... Is this right?
In BC2 it seems like the higher the better... Is this right?

Last edited by Sydney (15 years ago)
Quite a game on a losing team near the end of the match?Vilham wrote:
higher is better, at one point i had like 200 or so and then it dropped me to 0
Last edited by theDude5B (15 years ago)
doesn't a cap kinda nullify the point of an elo rating system?Uzique wrote:
it's a bit more complicated than that... but yes, at its core it is just the ELO Ratings system with a few changed variables (source is bc2 dev, cant remember where i read it...)
back when it was actually working, pre-patch, i was world top500. now im just capped at 200 and it doesnt ever change. pretty redundant stat atm.
11 Bravo wrote:
Last edited by CammRobb (15 years ago)
OH MAN. I'm so butthurt! You said nasty things to me on facebook. "MUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUM, this boy called me-he-he names at sch-hoo-hool today"Uzique wrote:
aww look cammrobb is butthurt so he's lazily quoting a post from a guy that hates his fucking ass just so he can recycle a 'point' that has already been refuted.
cuuuuuuuuuuuute