Aspect ratio question

2010-04-13 14:26:02

#1

baggs: Member; +732|6463

Good evening,

My PS3 is my Blu-Ray/DVD player which is connected an LG32LH5000. Why is it that sometimes i see a border around the picture? Am i correct in thinking it's the format the film was recorded in? Some Blu-Ray's play full screen, some don't and all DVD's play with a border. I got the PS3 set to 'Full' upscale and of course it's connected via HDMI.

Any suggestions?

2010-04-13 14:27:19

#2

SEREMAKER: BABYMAKIN EXPERT √; +2,187|6827|Mountains of NC

its the movie ......... watch Dark Knight .... it will mostly stay in widescreen but theres a few shots that they put in thats IMAX

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg

2010-04-13 14:39:56

#3

Ilocano: buuuurrrrrrppppp.......; +341|6926

Not all WS are 16:9. anamorphic WS is 2.35:1.

Last edited by Ilocano (2010-04-13 14:43:43)

2010-04-13 15:07:51

#4

Kimmmmmmmmmmmm: ©; +1,811|6255

LG 32LH4000 32" LCD TV
Built-in Digital Freeview
HD Ready 1080p (1920 x 1080) Resolution

what is freeview?

2010-04-13 15:14:44

#5

Surgeons: U shud proabbly f off u fat prik; +3,097|6748|Gogledd Cymru

Like cable tv but with less channels, and free.

2010-04-13 15:19:01

#6

Kimmmmmmmmmmmm: ©; +1,811|6255

ah ok thought the digi freeview was some sort of auto format thing lol

2010-04-14 03:43:09

#7

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6047|Catherine Black

Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
ah ok thought the digi freeview was some sort of auto format thing lol

Nah it's just about 50 channels we get free in the UK over the airwaves if you have a receiver box.

Baggs, it's all up to the filmmaker. Some render their films in much shorter aspect ratios for reasons only known to them, I see no advantage in it, except perhaps to reduce filesize, or create an effect.. but you've got 50GB on a blu-ray right? And the only effect I get is annoyance.

2010-04-14 05:36:14

#8

baggs: Member; +732|6463

Finray wrote:
Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:
ah ok thought the digi freeview was some sort of auto format thing lol
Nah it's just about 50 channels we get free in the UK over the airwaves if you have a receiver box.

Baggs, it's all up to the filmmaker. Some render their films in much shorter aspect ratios for reasons only known to them, I see no advantage in it, except perhaps to reduce filesize, or create an effect.. but you've got 50GB on a blu-ray right? And the only effect I get is annoyance.

Yeah tbh, it's fucking annoying when i can't use an entire 32" of 1080p goodness. At least 'Up' played full screen and thats breathtaking.

2010-04-14 05:44:33

#9

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6047|Catherine Black

Yeah animated films are usually correct on aspect to the pixel, because you can easily fuck with that stuff when rendering.

I was thinking of getting a 16:9 monitor, just for the reason I hate letterboxing, but I figured I'm going to get letterboxing no matter what aspect ratio I go.

2010-04-14 07:07:01

#10

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6456|Winland

I feel great when I hear you moan, Finny. I can't even see the letterboxing on my plasma if the room is darkened ^_^

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2010-04-14 07:07:46

#11

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6047|Catherine Black

Freezer7Pro wrote:
I feel great when I hear you moan, Finny. I can't even see the letterboxing on my plasma if the room is darkened ^_^

Indeed. However, I enjoy sunlight. It feels nice on my skin. I don't live in a cave.

2010-04-14 07:21:33

#12

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|6997|Toronto | Canada

Movies' aspect ratios are completely up to how they're filmed. Its more common that the movie itself is not full 1080p than it is.

Just let it play at its natural aspect ratio, it looks like shit if you set the screen to fill/stretch to fit (drives me crazy when people do this).

Finray wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
I feel great when I hear you moan, Finny. I can't even see the letterboxing on my plasma if the room is darkened ^_^
Indeed. However, I enjoy sunlight. It feels nice on my skin. I don't live in a cave.

Window shades + lights off when you're watching a movie?

2010-04-14 07:23:45

#13

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6047|Catherine Black

Tbh it doesn't really bother me all that much if I can see the letterboxing or not. Sure, I'd prefer not to have it, but there's nothing you can do if it's there. I'd rather not have it so dark that I can't even see the outline of my monitor. Bad for your eyes having such contrast. One of the reasons I illuminate the wall behind my monitor 24/7.

2010-04-14 07:25:23

#14

Surgeons: U shud proabbly f off u fat prik; +3,097|6748|Gogledd Cymru

Freezer7Pro wrote:
I feel great when I hear you moan, Finny.

I knew you were weird, but this takes it to a whole new level...

2010-04-14 07:36:13

#15

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|6997|Toronto | Canada

Finray wrote:
Tbh it doesn't really bother me all that much if I can see the letterboxing or not. Sure, I'd prefer not to have it, but there's nothing you can do if it's there. I'd rather not have it so dark that I can't even see the outline of my monitor. Bad for your eyes having such contrast. One of the reasons I illuminate the wall behind my monitor 24/7.

I have ambient light in my room, but I would never light up the wall behind my monitor.

2010-04-14 07:38:15

#16

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6047|Catherine Black

Winston_Churchill wrote:
Finray wrote:
Tbh it doesn't really bother me all that much if I can see the letterboxing or not. Sure, I'd prefer not to have it, but there's nothing you can do if it's there. I'd rather not have it so dark that I can't even see the outline of my monitor. Bad for your eyes having such contrast. One of the reasons I illuminate the wall behind my monitor 24/7.
I have ambient light in my room, but I would never light up the wall behind my monitor.

Why not? When it gets dark in my room, and I'm staring at a bright monitor without light behind it, my eyes get watery and sore and bloodshot. With back lighting, none of the above.

2010-04-14 07:41:50

#17

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|6997|Toronto | Canada

Finray wrote:
Winston_Churchill wrote:
Finray wrote:
Tbh it doesn't really bother me all that much if I can see the letterboxing or not. Sure, I'd prefer not to have it, but there's nothing you can do if it's there. I'd rather not have it so dark that I can't even see the outline of my monitor. Bad for your eyes having such contrast. One of the reasons I illuminate the wall behind my monitor 24/7.
I have ambient light in my room, but I would never light up the wall behind my monitor.
Why not? When it gets dark in my room, and I'm staring at a bright monitor without light behind it, my eyes get watery and sore and bloodshot. With back lighting, none of the above.

Due to the awesomeness that is the human eye, having the light behind it would make the colours look washed out compared to a dark background.

2010-04-14 09:30:37

#18

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6456|Winland

Finray wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
I feel great when I hear you moan, Finny. I can't even see the letterboxing on my plasma if the room is darkened ^_^
Indeed. However, I enjoy sunlight. It feels nice on my skin. I don't live in a cave.

You watch movies in sunlight?

The hell?

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2010-04-14 09:32:09

#19

Finray: Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro; +2,629|6047|Catherine Black

Freezer7Pro wrote:
Finray wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
I feel great when I hear you moan, Finny. I can't even see the letterboxing on my plasma if the room is darkened ^_^
Indeed. However, I enjoy sunlight. It feels nice on my skin. I don't live in a cave.
You watch movies in sunlight?

The hell?

Oh yeah I forgot the Arctic gets 24/7 darkness in the winter.

2010-04-14 09:38:14

#20

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6456|Winland

Finray wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
Finray wrote:

Indeed. However, I enjoy sunlight. It feels nice on my skin. I don't live in a cave.
You watch movies in sunlight?

The hell?
Oh yeah I forgot the Arctic gets 24/7 darkness in the winter.

No seriously. Who the fuck watches movies in sunlight? There's a reason for cinemas not having any windows, you know.

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2010-04-14 11:11:00

#21

baggs: Member; +732|6463

fuck off Freezer, you shut in.

2010-04-14 12:24:50

#22

Bertster7: Confused Pothead; +1,101|6840|SE London

Winston_Churchill wrote:
Finray wrote:
Winston_Churchill wrote:

I have ambient light in my room, but I would never light up the wall behind my monitor.
Why not? When it gets dark in my room, and I'm staring at a bright monitor without light behind it, my eyes get watery and sore and bloodshot. With back lighting, none of the above.
Due to the awesomeness that is the human eye, having the light behind it would make the colours look washed out compared to a dark background.

Isn't that pretty much how Phillips Ambilight technology worked?

2010-04-14 12:42:35

#23

Winston_Churchill: Bazinga!; +521|6997|Toronto | Canada

Bertster7 wrote:
Winston_Churchill wrote:
Finray wrote:
Why not? When it gets dark in my room, and I'm staring at a bright monitor without light behind it, my eyes get watery and sore and bloodshot. With back lighting, none of the above.
Due to the awesomeness that is the human eye, having the light behind it would make the colours look washed out compared to a dark background.
Isn't that pretty much how Phillips Ambilight technology worked?

Ambient Light Technology is a lighting system that actively adjusts both brightness and colour based upon picture content.

It changes colour with the picture to ease eye stress, thats totally different than a solid white light.

BF2S Forums Aspect ratio question

Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:

Finray wrote:

Kimmmmmmmmmmmm wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Finray wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Finray wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

Finray wrote:

Finray wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

Finray wrote:

Finray wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Finray wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Finray wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Finray wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

Finray wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Winston_Churchill wrote:

Finray wrote:

Board footer