carini had a lumpy head
wat
it's cheese you nobendMekstizzle wrote:
wtf is havarti
Fuck, you fail so hard mek
Do a Research NoobMekstizzle wrote:
wtf is havarti
My girlfriend just linked me to it
pics of mom
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
why do i get warned by a mod about pace, when he resurrected a post 4 years old.
because we have been banned before, and he hasn't? i dunno, lol . . .seymorebutts443 wrote:
why do i get warned by a mod about pace, when he resurrected a post 4 years old.
still, he necroposts and spams/trolls.
i havent been banned before...burnzz wrote:
because we have been banned before, and he hasn't? i dunno, lol . . .seymorebutts443 wrote:
why do i get warned by a mod about pace, when he resurrected a post 4 years old.
that said ive gotten 2 awms for spam from responding to his posts/topics
still. those topics are usually closed and not purged. but i guess since he doesnt bump topics on purpose there is an excuse to not close..unlike when f/13/taiwan necroposts..
i swear ive read that Marine Corps Weapons Review: From Iraq in another topic.. http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=61848
found it.
Last edited by RTHKI (2010-04-21 09:40:55)
because you guys are spamming a thread. If he 'necroposts' and you have a problem, hit the report button. I don't really see a problem with posting in a 4 year old thread if it is on topic. I do see a problem with posting in a 4 year old thread simply because someone else did, especially to say, "woah, you brought this thread to the front of the page of new posts and I haven't seen it before so let me click on the link, see that it is 4 years old and comment on that instead of anything of relevance to the OP".
I seem to have broken every rule on the site accidentilly, well, other than the no citing which I put off before I cited my sources two days ago. Wow. I'm not overstaying my welcome, am I?burnzz wrote:
because we have been banned before, and he hasn't? i dunno, lol . . .seymorebutts443 wrote:
why do i get warned by a mod about pace, when he resurrected a post 4 years old.
ban
anyway, it's an awm not a death sentence. a simple way for me to message you within the thread.
Phissux, not to be arrogant or everything, but If I was going to be banned, it wouldve been done already. Especially because of the chaos my RWF were creating. BTW, if you are refferring to me TG, I'm someone totally new. I'm definitely not this Fancy_Pollux guy (I researched him on the whatever happened to thread, and learned that he is famous for plagiarising, now I know my people are calling me him) And I'm not Androoz either. Only Androoz is Androoz.
oh you are good pace. +1
Retardidly enough, I used to think AWM referred to the Arctic Wwarfare Magnum, and you sent rulebreakers pictures of L-96's as a warning of what happens to those who violate the sacred laws of bf2s. They mean something like Automated warning message, right?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
anyway, it's an awm not a death sentence. a simple way for me to message you within the thread.
urdoingitwrongpace51 wrote:
(I researched him on the whatever happened to thread
Correct notation wrote:
I did a research
afternoon gents and gentesses
stfu mark
but i luvs you splurgeons
o.Opace51 wrote:
Retardidly enough, I used to think AWM referred to the Arctic Wwarfare Magnum, and you sent rulebreakers pictures of L-96's as a warning of what happens to those who violate the sacred laws of bf2s. They mean something like Automated warning message, right?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
anyway, it's an awm not a death sentence. a simple way for me to message you within the thread.
I was joking mark.
LOL!!
LOL!!
I'm not actually trying to be funny. I really never knew what that meant (AWM). Wwhat does it mean?
Last edited by pace51 (2010-04-21 09:54:08)