Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6406|Vortex Ring State
I'd say no, because:

#1: No group has claimed responsibility for the act (none that I know of)
#2: Very few people died, if it was a terrorist attack, they probably would've targeted a more vulnerable section of the rig.

However:

#1: The rig was sunk, if the terrorists objective was to do that, they succeeded
#2: Nothing was going wrong prior to the explosion.
baggs
Member
+732|6611
care to fill me in?
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6406|Vortex Ring State
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,746|7143|Cinncinatti
No signs of trouble doesn't mean something didn't go wrong..
So no. Don't really know why they would target an oil rig that was carrying out exploratory drilling.

This seems like DST talk btw

Last edited by RTHKI (2010-04-22 15:00:48)

https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6406|Vortex Ring State

RTHKI wrote:

No signs of trouble doesn't mean something didn't go wrong..
So no. Don't really know why they would target an oil rig that was carrying out exploratory drilling.

This seems like DST talk btw
it's speculation, soooooooo... decided not to post in D/ST
Trotskygrad
бля
+354|6406|Vortex Ring State
mods move to D/ST please. Would be greatly appreciated.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard