Okay, so apparently it's a Hindu scripture about Krishna or some shit.
But when exactly did I quote it?
But when exactly did I quote it?
harry krishna?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Okay, so apparently it's a Hindu scripture about Krishna or some shit.
i wouldnt worry mate, if you had a face to face conversation with Uzique he'd be fucked, luckily he can sit on the forums and spout his dribble with a tab opened to Google.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Okay, so apparently it's a Hindu scripture about Krishna or some shit.
But when exactly did I quote it?
now i am become death, the destroyer of worldsDoctor Strangelove wrote:
Okay, so apparently it's a Hindu scripture about Krishna or some shit.
But when exactly did I quote it?
Last edited by Uzique (2010-04-24 17:27:19)
am i? ....oh paranoia setting in again zique?Uzique wrote:
hahaha oh shit fatman baggs is gonna killlll meeee
And then referenced again in Full Metal Jacket.Uzique wrote:
nope, just a reaction to your random-as-fuck google jabs
it's a quote from hindu scripture, referenced by oppenheimer re: the hydrogen bomb. i remember his remark. i dont read ancient hindu books.
Last edited by Doctor Strangelove (2010-04-24 17:49:38)
Last edited by Uzique (2010-04-24 17:50:53)
stop itDauntless wrote:
i heard they're going to re-release Avatar in the cinemas again in 3D with a few minutes extra footage
no i was srs...baggs wrote:
stop itDauntless wrote:
i heard they're going to re-release Avatar in the cinemas again in 3D with a few minutes extra footage
ha ha oh fuck!Dauntless wrote:
no i was srs...baggs wrote:
stop itDauntless wrote:
i heard they're going to re-release Avatar in the cinemas again in 3D with a few minutes extra footage
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8634216.stm
wasn't saying that everyone should like the same shit, only saying people's opinions are the sum of their experiences.^*AlphA*^ wrote:
- likes every movie Reciprocity likes now
- likes every book Reciprocity likes now
- likes every entertainment Reciprocity likes now
- likes every art Reciprocity likes now
ok maybe i'm just not getting you, and if thats true i'm sorry for that.
Im a massive nonceDBBrinson1 wrote:
shooter 7/10
Last edited by mkxiii (2010-04-25 07:19:54)
Silly Mark, Statham wasn't in Shootermkxiii wrote:
watched that yesterday too, id say about 7-8/10DBBrinson1 wrote:
shooter 7/10
the twists were pretty predictable, but was still a fun film and the actors fitted the roles well, especially Jason Statham who essentially played Jason Statham as per usual
fail, i watched shooter directly after revolver and confused the twoM.O.A.B wrote:
Silly Mark, Statham wasn't in Shootermkxiii wrote:
Im a massive nonceDBBrinson1 wrote:
shooter 7/10
Man On Fire 9/10
Awsm film.
Last edited by mkxiii (2010-04-25 07:20:32)
NEVAR!mkxiii wrote:
fail, i watched shooter directly after revolver and confused the twoM.O.A.B wrote:
Silly Mark, Statham wasn't in Shootermkxiii wrote:
Im a massive nonce
Man On Fire 9/10
Awsm film.
feel free to edit your post to match
LolMiggle wrote:
ITT: Poseidon continues to think he's like the rest of BF2s, even though he plays with dolls.
Was it your mom?Poseidon wrote:
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
have a girl touch your penis and then talk to me
Go visit the desert in the Middle East and tell me you won't get dehydrated in 10 secondsbaggs wrote:
i was the first on bf2s to bitch about the sniper scene, the rest of these shut-in's just jumped on my bandwagon!Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Before you bitch about the sniper scene, pay attention and the Black Dude says he was in the Rangers before.FatherTed wrote:
d/ling Hurt Locket atm, will post a real world facts 2moro