Poll

5870 1gb or 2gb, which one should i get?

1 gb22%22% - 5
2 gb77%77% - 17
Total: 22
Computer_Guy
Member
+54|6955
Alright so I returned my preivous 5870 since it was locking up and crashing in some of my games and i'm going to get another one. The question is whether i should get one with 2gb ram or 1gb ram. I am using eyefinity with a resolution of 6048x1200 with bezel correction.
-MetaL*
Sup guies
+157|5892|Southern California
Well with that giant fucking resolution then I would say the 2GB version.
GC_PaNzerFIN
Work and study @ Technical Uni
+528|6673|Finland

Well 2GB. Obviously.

That is a gig-fucking-antic resolution.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
jsnipy
...
+3,277|6781|...

holy shit that resolution
Computer_Guy
Member
+54|6955
https://media.bestofmicro.com/H/T/242993/original/1GB%20vs%202GB.png
https://media.bestofmicro.com/H/S/242992/original/1GB%20vs%202GB%20CrossFire.png
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|6008|شمال
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
Jaekus
I'm the matchstick that you'll never lose
+957|5437|Sydney
I don't understand. Surely the 2gb would pull more fps, not less than the 1gb?
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6220|Places 'n such
Doesnt having 2gb take up room in addreses that could be used for other stuff, RAM and such?
Not really in the know for this sorta thing.
I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6826|NYC / Hamburg

Modern CPUs can address 256 TiB. Won't be a problem
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
Finray
Hup! Dos, Tres, Cuatro
+2,629|6047|Catherine Black

max wrote:

Modern CPUs can address 256 TiB. Won't be a problem
Yes, but that's restricted immensely by 64-bit operating systems... to 192GB.
https://i.imgur.com/qwWEP9F.png
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6826|NYC / Hamburg

That's just an artificial limitation created by MS for W7. Server 2008 can use 2TB in some editions. Linux should be able to use all of the 2^48
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
presidentsheep
Back to the Fuhrer
+208|6220|Places 'n such

Finray wrote:

max wrote:

Modern CPUs can address 256 TiB. Won't be a problem
Yes, but that's restricted immensely by 64-bit operating systems... to 192GB.
Shit there goes my ideas for a 97 way crossfire sytem
On the topic of graphics cards, surely the larger memory one would be better for a huge resolution like that, unless clock speeds etc are noticably shite.

Last edited by presidentsheep (2010-05-09 13:16:28)

I'd type my pc specs out all fancy again but teh mods would remove it. Again.
max
Vela Incident
+1,652|6826|NYC / Hamburg

I think W7 is limited to 8 GPUs.
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot  xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard