<3 Pidgin
Uses fewer resources than MSN fyi. I prefer the UI of WMP - and it has better smoothing. Still use VLC for anything it won't play.FloppY_ wrote:
Ah yeh, I use VLC 100% of the time so I wouldn't know
Trillian eh? I'll stick to msn
-kon
Meh 4GB ram is enough for MSN + what elsekonfusion wrote:
Uses fewer resources than MSN fyi. I prefer the UI of WMP - and it has better smoothing. Still use VLC for anything it won't play.FloppY_ wrote:
Ah yeh, I use VLC 100% of the time so I wouldn't know
Trillian eh? I'll stick to msn
-kon
I don't think I ever watch anything WMP CAN play
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
I dont think I ever watch anything VLC or WMP CAN playFloppY_ wrote:
Meh 4GB ram is enough for MSN + what elsekonfusion wrote:
Uses fewer resources than MSN fyi. I prefer the UI of WMP - and it has better smoothing. Still use VLC for anything it won't play.FloppY_ wrote:
Ah yeh, I use VLC 100% of the time so I wouldn't know
Trillian eh? I'll stick to msn
-kon
I don't think I ever watch anything WMP CAN play
BluRay rips?Winston_Churchill wrote:
I dont think I ever watch anything VLC or WMP CAN playFloppY_ wrote:
Meh 4GB ram is enough for MSN + what elsekonfusion wrote:
Uses fewer resources than MSN fyi. I prefer the UI of WMP - and it has better smoothing. Still use VLC for anything it won't play.
-kon
I don't think I ever watch anything WMP CAN play
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Not often. I use it since VLC fails hard at high quality 1080p encodes.FloppY_ wrote:
BluRay rips?Winston_Churchill wrote:
I dont think I ever watch anything VLC or WMP CAN playFloppY_ wrote:
Meh 4GB ram is enough for MSN + what else
I don't think I ever watch anything WMP CAN play
Erm?Winston_Churchill wrote:
Not often. I use it since VLC fails hard at high quality 1080p encodes.FloppY_ wrote:
BluRay rips?Winston_Churchill wrote:
I dont think I ever watch anything VLC or WMP CAN play
BluRay rips = not often
VLC fails @ 1080p
BluRay rips = 1080p
I don't understand what the fuck you just said...
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
A rip is a direct BluRay data file, so the entire 40-50GB. An encode is when its processed into x264 and put into a Matroska container.FloppY_ wrote:
Erm?Winston_Churchill wrote:
Not often. I use it since VLC fails hard at high quality 1080p encodes.FloppY_ wrote:
BluRay rips?
BluRay rips = not often
VLC fails @ 1080p
BluRay rips = 1080p
I don't understand what the fuck you just said...
Just like a DVD rip is ~4.5GB and an XviD encode is around 700MB.
Last time I checked DVDrips were 700mb and BluRay rips were 4.2GBWinston_Churchill wrote:
A rip is a direct BluRay data file, so the entire 40-50GB. An encode is when its processed into x264 and put into a Matroska container.FloppY_ wrote:
Erm?Winston_Churchill wrote:
Not often. I use it since VLC fails hard at high quality 1080p encodes.
BluRay rips = not often
VLC fails @ 1080p
BluRay rips = 1080p
I don't understand what the fuck you just said...
Just like a DVD rip is ~4.5GB and an XviD encode is around 700MB.
At least, those are what we mean when we say them...
Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-06-06 13:16:36)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
o.OFloppY_ wrote:
Last time I checked DVDrips were 700mb and BluRay rips were 4.2GBWinston_Churchill wrote:
A rip is a direct BluRay data file, so the entire 40-50GB. An encode is when its processed into x264 and put into a Matroska container.FloppY_ wrote:
Erm?
BluRay rips = not often
VLC fails @ 1080p
BluRay rips = 1080p
I don't understand what the fuck you just said...
Just like a DVD rip is ~4.5GB and an XviD encode is around 700MB.
At least, those are what we mean when we say them...
I dunno what youre doing then. A typical DVD has 4.36GB of data on it. When you "rip" it to your computer thats what you get. Then its encoded to either XviD or x264 and brought down in size (most common is XviD 700MB in AVI container).
BluRays have anywhere from 20-50GB of data on them. They are ripped in that size to your computer, then encoded to either 720p or 1080p. The most common encodes (aka done by the Scene with an x264 codec and Matroska container) is 4.36GB 720p and 7.95GB 1080p. Other better encoders can range their encodes anywhere from 5GB to 25GB, depending on the movie itself.
I swear I've repeated this like 30 times on this site lol
Last edited by Winston_Churchill (2010-06-06 13:22:02)
Yeah I used to be confused, as everyone on worse sites labels 700MB SD movies as "DVD-Rip", when infact it's an encode.

Yeah but if you "aquire" a DVDrip from the internet e.g. aXXo, I know it's encoded but it's still referred to as a DVDrip...Winston_Churchill wrote:
o.OFloppY_ wrote:
Last time I checked DVDrips were 700mb and BluRay rips were 4.2GBWinston_Churchill wrote:
A rip is a direct BluRay data file, so the entire 40-50GB. An encode is when its processed into x264 and put into a Matroska container.
Just like a DVD rip is ~4.5GB and an XviD encode is around 700MB.
At least, those are what we mean when we say them...
I dunno what youre doing then. A typical DVD has 4.36GB of data on it. When you "rip" it to your computer thats what you get. Then its encoded to either XviD or x264 and brought down in size (most common is XviD 700MB in AVI container).
BluRays have anywhere from 20-50GB of data on them. They are ripped in that size to your computer, then encoded to either 720p or 1080p. The most common encodes (aka done by the Scene with an x264 codec and Matroska container) is 4.36GB 720p and 7.95GB 1080p. Other better encoders can range their encodes anywhere from 5GB to 25GB, depending on the movie itself.
I swear I've repeated this like 30 times on this site lol
Know what I mean now?
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Oh wow, aXXo He's worse than the scene. Do yourself a favour and stay away from shitty groups like aXXo, he frequently re-encodes releases, losing significant quality.FloppY_ wrote:
Yeah but if you "aquire" a DVDrip from the internet e.g. aXXo, I know it's encoded but it's still referred to as a DVDrip...Winston_Churchill wrote:
o.OFloppY_ wrote:
Last time I checked DVDrips were 700mb and BluRay rips were 4.2GB
At least, those are what we mean when we say them...
I dunno what youre doing then. A typical DVD has 4.36GB of data on it. When you "rip" it to your computer thats what you get. Then its encoded to either XviD or x264 and brought down in size (most common is XviD 700MB in AVI container).
BluRays have anywhere from 20-50GB of data on them. They are ripped in that size to your computer, then encoded to either 720p or 1080p. The most common encodes (aka done by the Scene with an x264 codec and Matroska container) is 4.36GB 720p and 7.95GB 1080p. Other better encoders can range their encodes anywhere from 5GB to 25GB, depending on the movie itself.
I swear I've repeated this like 30 times on this site lol
Know what I mean now?
And yes, poor sources/sites/groups label it as DVDrip at times. Thats just because theyre shitty places/groups that have no idea what theyre talking about or doing.
PffftWinston_Churchill wrote:
Oh wow, aXXo He's worse than the scene. Do yourself a favour and stay away from shitty groups like aXXo, he frequently re-encodes releases, losing significant quality.FloppY_ wrote:
Yeah but if you "aquire" a DVDrip from the internet e.g. aXXo, I know it's encoded but it's still referred to as a DVDrip...Winston_Churchill wrote:
o.O
I dunno what youre doing then. A typical DVD has 4.36GB of data on it. When you "rip" it to your computer thats what you get. Then its encoded to either XviD or x264 and brought down in size (most common is XviD 700MB in AVI container).
BluRays have anywhere from 20-50GB of data on them. They are ripped in that size to your computer, then encoded to either 720p or 1080p. The most common encodes (aka done by the Scene with an x264 codec and Matroska container) is 4.36GB 720p and 7.95GB 1080p. Other better encoders can range their encodes anywhere from 5GB to 25GB, depending on the movie itself.
I swear I've repeated this like 30 times on this site lol
Know what I mean now?
And yes, poor sources/sites/groups label it as DVDrip at times. Thats just because theyre shitty places/groups that have no idea what theyre talking about or doing.
aXXo is good quality as far as I am concerned... most of the movies I have "tested" from him were all I needed to enjoy the movie... I don't get you people who circlejerk over 1080p
On topic:

Wallpaper cycles
I realize the gradient colour on that wallpaper sucks, but I really like the wallpaper itself...
Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-06-06 13:43:10)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Quit wandering off-topic please.
If youre into blurry picture and poor audio then be my guest. He encodes things twice, which is why any person who knows anything about encoding knows he's absolute garbage. Try getting a SD x264 encode if you're not willing to get big files. Theyre typically 2-3 times the size of 700MB XviD but 10-20 times the quality.FloppY_ wrote:
PffftWinston_Churchill wrote:
Oh wow, aXXo He's worse than the scene. Do yourself a favour and stay away from shitty groups like aXXo, he frequently re-encodes releases, losing significant quality.FloppY_ wrote:
Yeah but if you "aquire" a DVDrip from the internet e.g. aXXo, I know it's encoded but it's still referred to as a DVDrip...
Know what I mean now?
And yes, poor sources/sites/groups label it as DVDrip at times. Thats just because theyre shitty places/groups that have no idea what theyre talking about or doing.
aXXo is good quality as far as I am concerned... most of the movies I have "tested" from him were all I needed to enjoy the movie... I don't get you people who circlejerk over 1080p
Also, saying you dont get why I like something of highly, highly significantly better quality is just dumb. I think its quite obvious why I would like getting movies in 1080p.
liquidat0r wrote:
Quit wandering off-topic please.
BAM
ontopic

edit: fullsize
ontopic

edit: fullsize
Last edited by Microwave (2010-06-06 14:04:21)
aXXo is shit

everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥
If I looked at my desktop more than once I week I would put more effort into it. Everything hides, normally aero is on but my GPU died

Fly pic by me

Fly pic by me
Last edited by Wallpaper (2010-06-07 21:10:19)
fly pic by Wallpaper

pic by Wallpaper

pic by Wallpaper
lllooooove those icons
-kon
PS: How is it even possible to go off topic in a thread which demands so little of people?
<3konfusion wrote:
lllooooove those icons
-kon
PS: How is it even possible to go off topic in a thread which demands so little of people?
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥

Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Why FF has never got rid of the RETARDED looking glow around their titles is beyond me.
everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... seriously. ♥