Pages: 1 … 163 164 165 166 167 … 227
I don't care.GullyFoyle wrote:
You can now pay to get the good weapons (on the consoles), instead of "earning" them. What do you think about that?
Last edited by west-phoenix-az (2010-06-10 10:17:10)
Then don't play Battlefield Heroeswest-phoenix-az wrote:
I don't care.GullyFoyle wrote:
You can now pay to get the good weapons (on the consoles), instead of "earning" them. What do you think about that?
When they sale weapons or vehicles that are superior is where I have a problem.
DICE is getting closer and closer to Activision's rediculous level of cow milking each day...west-phoenix-az wrote:
I don't care.GullyFoyle wrote:
You can now pay to get the good weapons (on the consoles), instead of "earning" them. What do you think about that?
When they sale weapons or vehicles that are superior is where I have a problem.
Because it would turn every class into snipers. The M14 does the same damage as the T88, is 20 RPM faster and this is balanced by not having optics.genius_man16 wrote:
Oh, so they are just flipping us off with recent footage. Super cool DICE.
I really don't understand the rationale behind not giving the G3 and M14 optics. It's not like they'd be any more OP than the AN-94, M60 or CG. And I don't think they'd be OP anyway, just way easier to use, especially the M14 with its grotesque iron sights.
Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-06-10 10:36:11)
QFTFloppY_ wrote:
DICE is getting closer and closer to Activision's rediculous level of cow milking each day...west-phoenix-az wrote:
I don't care.GullyFoyle wrote:
You can now pay to get the good weapons (on the consoles), instead of "earning" them. What do you think about that?
When they sale weapons or vehicles that are superior is where I have a problem.
The day DICE charges money for a map/skin pack for the PC is the day I stop buying DICE products... Stuff like that should be free DLC for PCs tbhgenius_man16 wrote:
QFTFloppY_ wrote:
DICE is getting closer and closer to Activision's rediculous level of cow milking each day...west-phoenix-az wrote:
I don't care.
When they sale weapons or vehicles that are superior is where I have a problem.
I used to be proud to say that i played DICE games instead of CoD ones, now there is hardly a difference between the two companies.
So the only money they should make is from initial release? What motivation does any company have to provide support then? I know everyone liked the free support that kept BF2 playable for six years but it was a rather stupid business decision on their part.FloppY_ wrote:
The day DICE charges money for a map/skin pack for the PC is the day I stop buying DICE products... Stuff like that should be free DLC for PCs tbhgenius_man16 wrote:
QFTFloppY_ wrote:
DICE is getting closer and closer to Activision's rediculous level of cow milking each day...
I used to be proud to say that i played DICE games instead of CoD ones, now there is hardly a difference between the two companies.
well there were the 2 boosters and SF. i paid 100 total for BF2. .JohnG@lt wrote:
So the only money they should make is from initial release? What motivation does any company have to provide support then? I know everyone liked the free support that kept BF2 playable for six years but it was a rather stupid business decision on their part.FloppY_ wrote:
The day DICE charges money for a map/skin pack for the PC is the day I stop buying DICE products... Stuff like that should be free DLC for PCs tbhgenius_man16 wrote:
QFT
I used to be proud to say that i played DICE games instead of CoD ones, now there is hardly a difference between the two companies.
That's why you, oh idk, keep making games? You act like DICE should just make BFBC2, then not do anything except making patches for the game.JohnG@lt wrote:
So the only money they should make is from initial release? What motivation does any company have to provide support then? I know everyone liked the free support that kept BF2 playable for six years but it was a rather stupid business decision on their part.FloppY_ wrote:
The day DICE charges money for a map/skin pack for the PC is the day I stop buying DICE products... Stuff like that should be free DLC for PCs tbhgenius_man16 wrote:
QFT
I used to be proud to say that i played DICE games instead of CoD ones, now there is hardly a difference between the two companies.
Last edited by genius_man16 (2010-06-10 10:53:50)
No, I wasn't saying that at all. I'm saying that if he wants continued support, he has to be willing to pay for stuff like map packs. If they aren't making any money off of the game they currently have out, why would they not drop support and just focus on putting new games out? That was my point.genius_man16 wrote:
That's why you, oh idk, keep making games? You act like DICE should just make BFBC2, then not do anything except making patches for the game.JohnG@lt wrote:
So the only money they should make is from initial release? What motivation does any company have to provide support then? I know everyone liked the free support that kept BF2 playable for six years but it was a rather stupid business decision on their part.FloppY_ wrote:
The day DICE charges money for a map/skin pack for the PC is the day I stop buying DICE products... Stuff like that should be free DLC for PCs tbh
And as it's been proven, DICE keeping BF2 playable for 6 years didn't exactly backfire did it? In fact, I would venture to say that helped them sell more BC2 games
Edit: Forgot about the booster packs they made, as RTHKI pointed out. There's always that option.
Bazajaytee wrote:
We have made some hit reg changes in the coming update (one of the things not on the changelist until we confirm everything before release).
Compare other studios, Valve adds ton of content to their games post-release for no extra cost....JohnG@lt wrote:
No, I wasn't saying that at all. I'm saying that if he wants continued support, he has to be willing to pay for stuff like map packs. If they aren't making any money off of the game they currently have out, why would they not drop support and just focus on putting new games out? That was my point.genius_man16 wrote:
That's why you, oh idk, keep making games? You act like DICE should just make BFBC2, then not do anything except making patches for the game.JohnG@lt wrote:
So the only money they should make is from initial release? What motivation does any company have to provide support then? I know everyone liked the free support that kept BF2 playable for six years but it was a rather stupid business decision on their part.
And as it's been proven, DICE keeping BF2 playable for 6 years didn't exactly backfire did it? In fact, I would venture to say that helped them sell more BC2 games
Edit: Forgot about the booster packs they made, as RTHKI pointed out. There's always that option.
Can't imagine they would. Why give everyone an aimbot? PC players don't have any real restrictions when it comes to looking around.JohnG@lt wrote:
I hope they don't give PC players the gay auto-aim crap that console players have.
Last edited by west-phoenix-az (2010-06-10 12:27:24)
Yeah, like headshot sniping on console.west-phoenix-az wrote:
It sure doesn't feel like there's an auto aim or aim assist on the PS3, then again I might of disabled it. I remember seeing it in the menu, but thought it was only for single player.
I think aiming with a mouse is a lot easier than with a console controller joystick.
Aim assist is definitely there. When I was playing my brothers PS3 the aim was very 'sticky'.west-phoenix-az wrote:
It sure doesn't feel like there's an auto aim or aim assist on the PS3, then again I might of disabled it. I remember seeing it in the menu, but thought it was only for single player.
I think aiming with a mouse is a lot easier than with a console controller joystick.
pssh. took me less than 2 weeks to unlock em all. Only tards with no skills would buy that.GullyFoyle wrote:
For the Lulz...
New Battlefield Blog Post - Prepare for the Onslaught:You can now pay to get the good weapons (on the consoles), instead of "earning" them. What do you think about that?Battlefield: Bad Company 2 is bringing Battlefield's first co-op mode to consoles with Onslaught mode. Up to 4 players can tackle the new objective based missions posting your best times on the co-op leaderboards as well as the chance to obtain new achievements and trophies. Onslaught will be available from June 22nd on Xbox 360 for 800 MS Points and on the PlayStation Network in North America for $9.99 followed by the European PlayStation Network on June 23rd for 8.99€.
If you were to play Onslaught in picture form it would look something like this:
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-fil … laught.jpg
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-fil … armour.JPG
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/cfs-fil … 0_Flee.jpg
Also this month, Battlefield: Bad Company 2 Kit Shortcuts will be available on Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 for those players who don't have time to spend levelling up to unlock all the kit specific items but still want to be competitive with those who have unlocked everything. The Kit Shortcuts will give you the unlocks available for kit each kit while still allowing you to progress through the ranking system as normal and will be available for 560 MS Points/$6.99 individually or if you want the whole bundle of kit shortcuts including the 7 available vehicle unlocks, 1600 MS Points on Xbox Live and $19.99/17.99€. The Kit Shortcuts will be available on Xbox Live Worldwide and European PlayStation Network from 16th June with the North American PlayStation Network having access to the shortcuts from 22nd June.
genius_man16 wrote:
Can't imagine they would. Why give everyone an aimbot? PC players don't have any real restrictions when it comes to looking around.JohnG@lt wrote:
I hope they don't give PC players the gay auto-aim crap that console players have.
Pages: 1 … 163 164 165 166 167 … 227
