i wasnt saying it was - dauntless i was saying that dauntless wasnt negative he was double negative so its:mtb0minime wrote:
Yeah but you had it as ... + Dauntless ..., and since Dauntless = (- ), that comes out to be ... - Dauntless ...mkxiii wrote:
more like double negative karmamtb0minime wrote:
That's too bad. Take Dauntless' negative contribution out of the equation and the value would be much higher.
- - = +
mkxiii + pass math = 0 --> mkxiii = -pass math = fail math
+ - - =
silly