too rich for me
Tu Stultus Es
I'll consider 3D the day I can do it without the glasses
and not a day sooner..
and not a day sooner..
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
then go watch a playFloppY_ wrote:
I'll consider 3D the day I can do it without the glasses
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Zalm … ages/1.gif
and not a day sooner..
Tu Stultus Es
lulz, I prefer the regular 2d movie experience on mah current PCeleven bravo wrote:
then go watch a playFloppY_ wrote:
I'll consider 3D the day I can do it without the glasses
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Zalm … ages/1.gif
and not a day sooner..
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
i was going to wait too, but that deal is pretty hard to turn down...
You don't get it?ig wrote:
i was going to wait too, but that deal is pretty hard to turn down...
Nomatter how good the deal is why would I get it when the main feature is 3D which I will never, EVER, use because of the goggles...
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
i dont care about you, faggot. its a fucking sick tv, 3d or not
You can get a sick TV just like it, probably cheaper considering £350 is for 3D accessories for two people and the fact that the 3D feature of the TV and BluRay probably drags the hardware price up a fuckton...ig wrote:
i dont care about you, faggot. its a fucking sick tv, 3d or not
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
I want to get it but I already have a 55" and a 65" at home already
He probably wants a 3D tv and a BluRay.FloppY_ wrote:
You can get a sick TV just like it, probably cheaper considering £350 is for 3D accessories for two people and the fact that the 3D feature of the TV and BluRay probably drags the hardware price up a fuckton...ig wrote:
i dont care about you, faggot. its a fucking sick tv, 3d or not
Duh.